This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Geosammie (talk | contribs) at 04:20, 14 November 2004 (→Medha Hari: how to deal with arbitary inclusions). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:20, 14 November 2004 by Geosammie (talk | contribs) (→Medha Hari: how to deal with arbitary inclusions)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Common spellings
Here is a result of Google searches for common misspellings of the name. This will be useful if in future there's a debate on whether this article needs to be redirected to any other spelling. Also if any other titles need to be redirected to this article. Search done on Aug 6. Jay 16:46, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
| "bharata natyam" | 20,100 |
| bharatanatyam | 17,300 |
| bharathanatyam | 8,520 |
| bharatnatyam | 7,280 |
| "bharat natyam" | 3,700 |
| "bharatha natyam" | 3,210 |
| bharathnatyam | 428 |
| "bharata nathyam" | 94 |
| "bharath natyam" | 89 |
| "bharatha nathyam" | 38 |
| "bharat nathyam" | 19 |
| bharatanathyam | 14 |
| bharathanathyam | 5 |
| bharatnathyam | 4 |
Yahoo search for
| bharatnatyam | 54,600 |
| "bharata natyam" | 35,600 |
| bharatanatyam | 33,300 |
| bharathanatyam | 26,400 |
Medha Hari
Never heard of this name. Also, why this ugly/advertising image is added here? --Rrjanbiah 09:55, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Dear Rrjanbiah,
- You need to learn more about the contemporary Bharatanatyam. And the picture is not at all ugly. -- 219.65.124.189 10:10, 8 Nov 2004
But, it definitely looks like a WikiSpam. The content of the articles and the pages linked to it seems to confirm that. --Rrjanbiah 07:13, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Rrjanbiah,|Medha Hari web site pages provide non-commercial information for FREE
Serge56
Hi Rrjanbiah! I looked in major directories (Open Directory, Looksmart, etc) and Medha Hari is listed there. Keep yourself updated. Geosammie 04:20, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
From Tamil Nadu?
Is Bharatanatyam orginated from Tamil Nadu? Someone at Tamil people added so. --Rrjanbiah 10:01, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Dear Rrjanbiah,
- It appears that you are not familiar with Bharatanatyam at all - 219.65.124.189 10:07, 8 Nov 2004
AFAIK, Bharathanatyam is a Telugu devadasi dance which was commercialized by brahmins like Rukmani Devi. But, neither this article nor any other artcile seems to say that it is Tamilians' dance. --Rrjanbiah 07:28, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Partisan advertisement and promotional campaign on behalf of medha hari is clearly visible by the link and image of medha hari being put up on the page. In order that neutrality is attained such partisan publicity should not be overlooked. Is wikipedia an advertising platform ? Water Fish 11:37, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
--
For Rrjanbiah: you are Telugu, aren't you? - there is no place for nationalism on Misplaced Pages
For Water Fish: I do not perceive adding relevant content as SPAM. External links are supported for enriching elements (such as the multimedia content). Before deleting anything, you better think of the benefit of the reader: will the photo be a valuable illustration? Will external links be a valuable extention of Misplaced Pages? --User:RalphWWW
I agree with Ralph Serge56