Misplaced Pages

User talk:Robertmark

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Meco (talk | contribs) at 22:01, 20 October 2006 (Licencing problem). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:01, 20 October 2006 by Meco (talk | contribs) (Licencing problem)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Altmanphoto

I've noticed that you've been uploading alot of Robert Altman photos, and I've been wondering if they're all authorized or if you've been contacting him through e-mail, because there's a photo of Jim Morrison that I think would help the article very much. Thank you. 75pickup (talk · contribs)

--

Robertmark 18:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC) Right, I have uploaded @ 20 photos recently. I am now trying to hold off uploading any more as I'm in a wait and see mode. I am concerned with the generous copyright permissions granted. I am also the photographer.

btw- I've noticed you've removed a Ronnie Spector photo and generously placed my photo atop her page. For myself, with Misplaced Pages, I am always respectful re whatever photo was already at the top of the page and will never personally remove one that precedes my own addition. I do appreciate the compliment.

Thank you 75pickup. -Robert Altman

Licencing problem

I have re-tagged the images you have uploaded and licenced with {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} changing the licence to {{copyrighted}}. The reason is that in the additional text you state that the image may be used in Misplaced Pages articles. Although you also state conditions for reuse, the express permission given to Misplaced Pages implicitly negates reuse by others unless these receive a similar explicit permission. This conflicts with our GFDL policy which precludes a "Misplaced Pages only" clause. According to the current guidelines these images will therefore be deleted. If you decide to allow licencing according to {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} without the invalidating clause, for instance if this is simply a matter of unfortunate enunciation, nothing would please us more! __meco 22:01, 20 October 2006 (UTC)