Misplaced Pages talk:Advocacy ducks

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Atsme (talk | contribs) at 15:09, 3 July 2017 (C). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:09, 3 July 2017 by Atsme (talk | contribs) (C)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Advocacy ducks page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days

Misplaced Pages essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Misplaced Pages essays, a collaborative effort to organize and monitor the impact of Misplaced Pages essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.Misplaced Pages essaysWikipedia:WikiProject Misplaced Pages essaysTemplate:WikiProject Misplaced Pages essaysWikiProject Misplaced Pages essays
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

This page was nominated for deletion on 23 May 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

Proposal

I propose to add a WL to a serious essay. QuackGuru (talk) 22:36, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

My suggestion is to add the link to the section "Related essays, policies, and guidelines" because the wikilink you're proposing is not the only behavioral characteristic. 22:54, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Since you have concerns about my editing here I will let you decide if you really want it in the essay. You can archive this discussion now. Good luck. QuackGuru (talk) 14:41, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

I made a suggestion because the essay you want to wikilink is unrelated to what you've chosen for the link - your essay focuses on citations, which is not a behaviorial characteristic. Considering your history with the AVDUCK essay, and the multiple "-1 edits" you've made here for no valid reason, as evidenced in the edit history, and the fact that you deleted my questions on your TP does raise a legitimate question - WHY? - but with all that aside, my position about the wikilink to your essay remains the same. Over-citing and under-citing is a sourcing issue, not an advocacy issue. Your wikilink will be better served in an essay about MOS or sources and inline citations. I wish you luck promoting your "serious essay" and hope it helps others become better editors as what AVDUCKS was created to do. 15:09, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Categories: