Talk:Historicity of Jesus/Merged content 2005

< Talk:Historicity of Jesus

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CheeseDreams (talk | contribs) at 16:12, 28 November 2004 (→Mithras Sol Invictus). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:12, 28 November 2004 by CheeseDreams (talk | contribs) (→Mithras Sol Invictus)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Part of a series on

Jesus in Christianity

Jesus in Islam

Background

Jesus in history

Perspectives on Jesus

Jesus in culture

Perspectives of Historicity

Many Christians believe that God plays an active role in history through miracles and divine revelation; and some take as a basis for their faith a divine authority for the Bible, and the divinity of Jesus. Some Christians believe in God but question the divinity of Jesus and the Bible, and rely more heavily on the work of scientists and historians.

Since Christological arguments for the existence of God became more prevelant in evangelical teachings, the issue of the historicity of Jesus gained greater significance, and arguments about historiography started to be used in significant ways in this context. Most Christian scholars, and many non-Christian scholars, do not dispute that a person named Jesus once lived, connected in some way to the biblical accounts, thinking that evidence for Jesus' existence is by historical standards fairly strong.

Many historians do not dispute the existence of a person who was named Jesus, but there is much less acceptance of the narrative of his life and death, and far less for any miraculous claims. Many scholars think that interpretations of Jesus' sayings are secondhand and literary extrapolations from his actions and mythologized invented detail which have been applied to an historical figure.

However, a number of critics have proposed that there was no historical Jesus, adducing as support for this position the paucity of non-Christian historical sources corroborating Christian writings. Perhaps most prolific of those Biblical scholars who discount the historical existence of Jesus is a professor of German, George Albert Wells, who argues that Jesus was originally a Gnostic myth.

Jesus and Syncretism

Main article:Jesus and syncretism

The Pythagoreans tied astronomy and geometry to mystical meaning, and often encoded deeper meaning within geometric or numerical representations, themselves encoded as outer mysteries in the form of stories. Some scholars think that some of these stories and their deeper meaning was incorporated into the story of Jesus, rather than them being a reflection on historic events. For example, 12 apostles is thought to be a reference to the Zodiac itself derived from geometry of spheres, 72 disciples is thought to be a reference to the precession of the Zodiac.

Other stories are thought to have more cryptic meaning, one of the best examples being the story of the 153 fish, which is thought to encode via Isopsephia (a greek version of Gematria) a mystical diagram known to Plato, the 153 being a repeated number in the diagram, and having religious significance connected to the Vesica Piscis. Many scholars have thought, throughout the centuries, that the feeding of the 5000 and the 4000 has a cryptic meaning, early ideas tying the numbers to Jews, Gentiles, the Torah, and Apostles, wheras more recent ideas suggest there is an encrypted mystic diagram. Other instances of isopsephia are thought to occur, such as 666 which is quite literally the number of the great beast.

File:IsisAndHorus20BC.gif

This image appears to denote the Virgin Mary and Jesus; however, it depicts Isis and Horus, and dates from 20BC

The pre-Christian egyptian god Horus, itself a syncretism of many local deities, is thought to have many similarities with Jesus. According to some scholars, Horus shares elements of the nativity with Jesus, such as a virgin mother Mary married to Joseph, preceeded by annunciation, announced by stars, occuring in Bethlehem, though the similarities supposedly only reveal themselves when transliterating between Demotic and Hebrew. Another story alleged to have been copied from Horus is that of the raising of Lazarus at Bethany, thought to be indentifiable with the raising of Osiris at the underworld, Annu, again only revealed by transliteration of the names.

Titles are also shared such as The way, the truth, the life, the anointed one, Light of the World, as are depictions, such as that of Mary and the baby Jesus, and the depiction of Mary in revelations. In addition, some allege that Set is the prototype for Satan, the story of the battle in the wilderness with temptation being shared between the stories. Since the Horus stories are thought to have astronomical meanings, some scholars suggest that this explains otherwise confusing ideas in the New Testament.

File:SteleWithAntinous.gif

Antinous with cross, and grapes

During the first and second centuries BC, Hellenic philosophy merged with minor deities to produce Mystery Religions, in which a Life-death-rebirth deity was used as allegory to encode wisdom. Such religion quickly replaced many local religions as the dominant form throughout the Mediterranian, with the resulting variations of the central god-man figure becoming known as Osiris-Dionysus. Some scholars think that Jesus was one of the forms of Osiris-Dionysus.

The religions share with christianity many things, such as a form of baptism, religious meals of bread and wine (sharing the same meaning as Christianity, disturbing Tertullian), the birthday of the central figure, pregnancy duration, nativity story, riding into town on a donkey, crucifixion at easter, and last judgement, although it varied as to which features were held in common.

Early christians (such as Justin Martyr and Tertullian) tended to provide unprovable supernatural explanations for the similarities with Mystery Religions, favouring statements that the Devil was responsible for the similarites, producing them to trick people into the wrong religion before Christianity came into existance a centuries later. Modern approaches are more reasoned, suggesting that all surviving evidence of the beliefs in the mystery religions postdates Jesus, and that the myths did not feature crucifixion in their early forms. The counter argument to such apologetics is that crucifixion is the likely consequence of the religions becoming mystery religions rather than their more literal original form, and that no surviving evidence of Christianity pre-dates Jesus either.

One of the forms of Osiris-Dionysus, Mithras, became the dominant form in the Roman army, spreading throughout the empire. Amongst the stories of the earlier forms of Mithras, is a story of a moon god Ea, later referred to as Oannes, whom some scholars think is the basis for John the Baptist his relationship to Jesus mirroring that of the moon to the sun. Also travelling with the early form is the case of priests known as Magi, whom some allege were inserted into the nativity story to give Jesus more importance.

Mithraism eventually syncretised with more explicit sun worship to become Mithras Sol Invictus, a religion that became official Roman policy, and many scholars think was the main competitor to Christianity. Constantine I, who was the highest priest of this cult, for the sake of unity, is thought by some scholars to have tried to smooth out the differences between the two, including moving the sabbath to Sunday (the day of Mithras Sol Invictus (Mithras, the unconquerable sun)), as well as moving the date of Jesus' birth to december 25th (the same day as that of Mithras, and Saturnalia).

Such smoothing is thought to have allowed Christianity (which bore semblence to the more literal reading of the stories that Mithraism taught was allegory) to gain the upper hand, for reasons outlined earlier by Celsus. Writing in the 2nd century, Celsus wrote (rather offensively) that Christianity spread amongst the ignorant and the illiterate, since they are not intelligent enough to interpret the beliefs allegorically.

Christianity's dominance was finally enforced by a decreee in 394 (by Theodosius, completely banning non-Christian religion. After the ban, mithraeum (the Mithras temples) were converted into churches, and according to certain scholars specifically Mithraic beliefs transferred to the archangel Michael, since the previous adherents of Mithraism still continued to worship in the same location, just claiming to be Christian.

Sources

Main article:Jesus and textual evidence

Although there is much evidence of Jesus attested by the Bible and the New Testament apocrypha (those works which the Council of Laodicea did not consider valid), those arguing against Jesus' historicity point out that since these are works written for religious reasons, they cannot be considered unbiased. Of the secular commentators in existence within memory of Jesus, from the evidence of their surviving works (which still survive in significantly high number to fill hundreds of volumes of text) only 6 are claimed to have written anything relating toJesus - Pliny the Younger, Josephus, Suetonius, Philo, Lucian, and Tacitus. Many scholars consider it odd that a man of such significance as Jesus should be missing from historic texts and records, since lesser figures are, unless, that is, Jesus didn't exist, or was insignificant. Supporters of Jesus' historicity proclaim that the other records became the New Testament.

Suetonius gave a single statement referring to Chrestus- some think this is a typographical error referring to Christ, but others point out that Chrestus translates as Useful One, a common slave name. Philo makes no mention of Jesus or Christians, but his philosophy matched to the extent that early Christians considered him as one of them. Lucian wrote a satire demonstrating the existence of Christians but condemning them as easily lead fools, wheras Pliny the Younger wrote the same opinion in prose. Tacitus wrote two paragraphs, one evidencing Christianity's existence, and one describing Jesus' death, which some scholars think he merely wrote having asked a Christian who Jesus was.

Many Christians use a passage from Josephus (found only in quotations apparantly from it by Eusebius) as evidence that the Bible is not the only contemporary document proclaiming the truth of their faith (such as the Resurrection of Jesus as Christ, part-God, who was executed at the suggestion of Jewish leaders, and won many converts). However, critical scholars note that the passage uses terms Josephus nowhere else uses, the passage is a rather odd thing for a non-Christian Jew to write, the other text reads more continuously without the passage in question, and that the first person known to have claimed that Josephus did not mention Jesus was Origen (who lived centuries before Eusebius who is the first person known to have claimed (or quoted) that he did). The discovery of a more neutral 10th century version, bolstered Christian hopes of the validity of the passage, however, it fails to explain why the earlier 9th century manuscripts should have the flaws, and may itself be a forgery.

The only known text claiming to be a form of official governmental records which also evidences Jesus, is the collection known as the Letters of Herod and Pilate. They are found in some 6th century manuscript copies of the work of Justus of Tiberias (who was of the same time as Josephus). However, these are almost universally regarded as forgeries, due to extreme obviousness, failure to match historic events or people, failure to match the biblical accounts, appearance as a vindictive wish list of retribution against Pilate and Herod, and other problems.

Jewish records, both oral and written, of the period, were compiled into the Talmud, a work so large that it fills at least 32 volumes. Within its vastness, there is very little mention of anyone called Jesus, the closest match being a person or persons called Yeshu. However, the description of Yeshu does not match the biblical accounts of Jesus, the name itself is usually considered to be a derogatory acronym for anyone attempting to convert Jews from Judaism, and the term does not occur in the Jerusalem version of the text (which, compared to the Babylonian version, would be expected to mention Jesus more). Some Christians proclaim that the lack of references, and the difficulty in associating Yeshu with Jesus, is due to Christianity being negligable when the Talmud was predominantly created, in addition to the Talmud being more concerned with teachings, than recording history.

Gnosticism

The Epistles of Paul

The epistles of Paul can be split into two sections, those known as the Pastoral Letters, and the non-Pastoral letters. The authenticity of the Pastoral letters is disputed by many scholars, for various reasons. The non-Pastoral letters do not mention Jesus in any way which implies he actually existed. The non-Pastorals feature many things in common with Gnosticism, including the esoteric style in which they were written. Some scholars theorise that Paul was a gnostic teacher, and as such saw Jesus as an allegory, as part of a Jewish mystery religion.

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it.

The Synoptic Gospels

The gospel of Mark makes much mention of secrets and of secret teachings. This is a founding principle of gnosticism, the secret teachings being gnosis. If the Secret Gospel of Mark is genuinely attributable to the same author, it can be considered to imply the existance of secret teachings. Thomas Didymous, also known as doubting Thomas, can be considered to be a Gnostic allegory. His name, having parts from two languages, literally means "Twin Twin". A twin of the Gnostic initiate is used to represent the earthly part of a character. Association between Thomas and Jesus points to Thomas being the earthly part of Jesus' gnostic self. This is further identified by the gradual learning process Thomas is put through, leading him to attain the nickname "doubting Thomas", symbolising the learning of the gnostic initiate. To gnostics, Jesus symbolises the gnostic initiate's higher self. His death and resurrection symbolise the throwing away of previous beliefs, and coming to gnosis. The naked youth at gethsemene, if identified with the white robed youth, at the tomb (who in some gospels is referred to as an angel), symbolises the initiation ceremony. These ceremonies typically consisted of stripping completely naked, being baptised, and then being robed in a white cloth. To gnostics, Jesus was not real. If the synoptic gospels are gnostic, they do not provide evidence for Jesus.

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it.

The Gospel of John

There is some doubt over the nature of the Author of the Gospel of John. Traditional views place it as being John, a disciple. More recent study reveals that it has various discrepencies with the description of John given in the bible. The generally accepted opinion is the John was the last gospel to be written. Most scholars place it in the second century, though are divided as to whether at the beginning or the end. During the second century, Christianity was embroiled in arguments over the nature of Jesus, particularly with the Gnostics. However, the synoptic gospels did not provide much anti-gnostic argument, and those who were vehemently anti-gnostic used quotes from the Gospel of John. The gospel of John differs substantially from the Synoptic Gospels. The first evidence of mention of the Gospel of John is in the works of Iranaeus, a vehement anti-gnostic. He makes great use of it, and there is some suspicion that he made it up for this purpose. If this is the case, the Gospel is a fake, and cannot count as evidence.

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it.

Other Gospels

Many non-canonical gospels exist. Sometimes, these are used to support evidence for Jesus. However, many consider some of these works to be wild fictions, such as the Infancy Gospel of Paul. Others are clearly gnostic, and as such cannot support the existance of Jesus as anything other than allegory.

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it.

Persecution of Gnostics

Gnosticism survived into the 13th century, producing groups such as the Cathars. Gnostic ideas of god, the consideration of Jesus as allegory, that it was the idea of Jesus' actions (as interpreted in Gnostic texts) that was the saving of Mankind rather than Jesus' actual actions, as well as willingness to tolerate other faiths, made the catholic church feel deeply threatened. To counter this, the pope ("Innocent" III) organised a "crusade" (massacre) against the gnostics known as the Albigensian Crusade. Then it created the Medieval Inquisition, from which other Inquisitions such as the Spanish Inquisition developed, to hunt anyone who still held the beliefs.

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it.

External links

Reference

Timothy Freke & Peter Gandy, The Jesus Mysteries - was the original Jesus a pagan god? ISBN:0722536771
Michael Grant, Jesus: An Historian's Review of the Gospels
Edgar J. Goodspeed, Biblical Forgeries
Raymond E. Brown, Joseph Fitzmyer, Roland Murphy, Jerome Biblical Commentary, Prentice Hall, 1968
Rudolf Bultmann, History of the Synoptic Tradition,Harper & Row, 1963
Edgar V. McKnight,What is Form Criticism?, 1997
Norman Perrin,What is Redaction Criticism?
Robin Jensen,Understanding Early Christian Art, Rutledge, 2000
Stephen Patterson, Marcus Borg, John Dominic Crossman, Edited by Hershel Shanks,The Search for Jesus: Modern Scholarship Looks at the Gospels,Biblical Archaeology Society, 1994 Symposium at the Smithsonian Institution, 11 Sept 1993
Earl Doherty, The Jesus Puzzle. Did Christianity Begin with a Mythical Christ?: Challenging the Existence of an Historical Jesus, Publisher: Canadian Humanist Pubns; 1st edition (October 19, 1999)
Phyllis Graham, The Jesus Hoax, Publisher: Frewin; (1974)
Charles Guignebert, Jesus, Publisher: Albin Michel; (December 31, 1969)
Gordon Stein, An Anthology of Atheism and Rationalism, Publisher: Prometheus Books; (December 1, 1989)
George A.Wells, The Historical Evidence for Jesus, Publisher: Prometheus Books; (January 1, 1988)
Ian Wilson, Jesus: The Evidence, Publisher: Regnery Publishing; 1 edition (October 1, 2000)
Barker, Dan. Losing Faith in Faith: From Preacher to Atheist. Freedom From Religion Foundation, 1992.
Bruce, F. F. The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable? 5th ed. Intervarsity, 1960.
Fox, Robin Lane. The Unauthorized Version: Truth and Fiction in the Bible. New York: Vintage, 1991.
Keller, James A. Contemporary Doubts About the Resurrection. Faith and Philosophy 5 (1988): 40-60.
Mackie, J.L The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and against the Existence of God. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
Martin, Michael. The Case Against Christianity. Temple University, 1991.
McCabe, Joseph. The Myth of the Resurrection and Other Essays. 1925. Prometheus, 1993.
Miller, Glenn. Christian `bias' in the NT Writers: Does it render the NT unreliable or inadmissable as evidence? 23 Feb. 1995.
O'Hair, Madalyn. Fundamentalism. Memphis State University. 22 Oct. 1986.
O'Hair, Madalyn. Why I Am An Atheist. Second Revised Edition. American Atheist Press, 1991.
Ranke-Heinemann, Ute. Putting Away Childish Things: the Virgin Birth, the Empty Tomb, and Other Fairy Tales You Don't Need to Believe to Have a Living Faith. Translated by Peter Heinegg. 1992. Harper Collins, 1994.
Russell, Bertrand. Why I Am Not a Christian. Touchstone, 1957.
Spong, John Shelby. Rescuing the Bible from Fundamentalism: A Bishop Rethinks the Meaning of Scripture. Harper Collins, 1991.
Stamos, David N. Why I Am Not a New Apostolic Leaving the Fold: Testimonies of Former Fundamentalists. Edited by Ed Babinski. Prometheus, 1995.
Stein, Gordon Ed. An Anthology of Atheism and Rationalism. Prometheus, 1980.
Stein, Gordon Ed. The Encyclopedia of Unbelief. Prometheus, 1985.
Stein, Gordon Ed. Freethought in the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth. Greenwood Press, 1981.
Stein, Gordon Ed. God Pro and Con: A Bibliography of Atheism. Garland, 1990.
Robert Ingersoll A Checklist. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1969.
Stein, Gordon and Marshall Brown. Freethought in the United States: A Descriptive Bibliography. Greenwood Press, 1978.
Swinburne, Richard. For the Possibility of Miracles - To Believe or Not to Believe: Readings in the Philosophy of Religion. Edited by E.D. Klemke. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1992.
Taylor, Larry. MessiahGate - A Tale of Murder and Deception. August 1987: 1-7.
Till, Farrell. Did They Tarry in the City? The Skeptical Review. Volume 3, Number 2.
Watts, Charles. The Claims of Christianity Examined from a Rationalist Standpoint. Watts & Co., 1895.
Wheless, Joseph. Forgery in Christianity: A Documented Record of the Foundations of the Christian Religion. Psychiana, 1930.
Wheless, Joseph. Is It God's Word? Kessinger, 1925.
Zindler, Frank R. Biography. - Leaving the Fold: Testimonies of Former Fundamentalists. Ed. Ed Babinski. Prometheus, 1995.
Zindler, Frank R. Dial an Atheist: Greatest Hits from Ohio American Atheist Press, 1991.

Remains of original article before edit started

Debates concerning the historicity of Jesus center on two issues: the role of God in natural and human history, and the veracity of the New Testament as a historical source.

The Epistles Of Paul

Paul's letters appear to have a distinct lack of detail about Jesus' day-to-day existence or activities, leading to scholars such as Earl Doherty suggesting that Paul's idea of Jesus was derived from his reading of the Tanakh. Most of Paul's references to Jesus make little mention of his time on earth, although, in letters that many scholars consider to be forgeries, there is reference, in moderate detail, to the Last Supper as though it was an actual historical event.

In this extreme position within this skeptical view, Paul had not heard of any actual person named Jesus from Nazareth (or Bethlehem), but rather believed in a metaphysical Jesus who died on some ethereal plane at the beginning of time, or some far-off time in history.

Gnostics

In general, some Christians groups tended to oppose Gnosticism; for instance Marcion was quickly condemned for his Gnostic interpretation of the Scriptures. Irenaeus, a reknowned second century heresy condemner, and church father, said, in Against Heresies, of the Valentinian group of Gnostics "They keep asking us how it is that when they confess the same things, and hold the same doctrines, we call them heretics"

The case for the myth usually states that the reason Christianity doesn't view Jesus as a myth is because they didn't comprehend it. The failure of mystery religions was that by their very nature, the masses took the stories somewhat literally, with the belief in the literal truth of stories eventually superceding the understanding of it as metaphor.

Categories:

Misplaced Pages