This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Thryduulf (talk | contribs) at 19:52, 9 October 2006 (→[]: discussion concluded: deletion endorsed). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:52, 9 October 2006 by Thryduulf (talk | contribs) (→[]: discussion concluded: deletion endorsed)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| < October 4 | October 6 > |
|---|
- Full reviews may be found in this page history. For a summary, see Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Recently concluded (2006 October)
5 October 2006
Iggy (program)
This was deleted because i had already made a page about it a while ago. It was deleted then because no information was found through a google search or anything for it and it didn't have any information about it on the internet at all.
Now however, the program is a few vesrions on and has its own website at www.huckool.com/iggy (not sure if google is listing it yet but it is there).
I'm not advertising because the program is a completely free, harmless, adfree download which means there's apsolutely nothing in it for me (the owner).
The page for it was at "Iggy (Program)"
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahpro (talk • contribs)
- Note the discussion in question is Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Iggy (program) Middenface 20:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep deleted. Independent third-party coverage is needed for the program to be considered notable, and to justify overturning the AfD. Self-published sources are not sufficient. --Sam Blanning 21:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep deleted. DRV is about process, not content, and the nom is merely asking for the article to be put back because things have changed on his end; that's not a process argument. Ahpro is of course free to create a new Iggy (progam) article whenever he wants as long as it's somehow different (preferably quite a bit different) from the version that was deleted. Of course, if other editors believe the new article isn't somehow different, or otherwise suffers from the same problem(s) that got it brought up on an AfD in the first place, it will probably be speedily deleted. (Note to Ahpro: Please take this advice to heart; until your program achieves some sort of notability - like a review in a major computer magazine or something - any recreation of the Iggy article will probably get killed off again.) --Aaron 00:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Endorse deletion per Sam - third-party sources are needed. Daniel.Bryant 00:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC) (edit conflict, yet to read Aaron's, so I can't say "per Aaron" yet.)