Talk:Gorsedd - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) at 02:32, 14 December 2017 (Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.6.1) (Balon Greyjoy)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:32, 14 December 2017 by InternetArchiveBot (talk | contribs) (Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.6.1) (Balon Greyjoy))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Celts NA‑class Mid‑importance

	Gorsedd is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts
NA	This redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Redirect‑class Mid‑importance

	Wales portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm a little puzzled about the question of whether bards outrank ovates. Many sites imply it's so, and on one particular site and also in the Gorsedd's own literature, it's stated explicitly. However, other organisations also seem to use those ranks (see e.g. Neo-druidism) and the order there is that ovates outrank bards. If anyone feels like sanity-checking this, I'd appreciate it.

I'd also like to know whether, given that all members of the Cornish Gorseth wear blue (as their site seems to say), there are nevertheless similar ranks within that organisation. Marnanel 03:11, Apr 7, 2004 (UTC)

The Cornish bards are all of one rank. The lone exception is the Grand Bard who is elected by a vote of his peers to a term of three years. He is the only one that stands above the circle of bards. Past Grand Bards wear a special cowl that honors them for the role the previously filled.

There is a strong link between the Cornish bardic circle and the round table of King Arthur. It very much reflects the democratic or egalitarian inclination of the Celts. Bcurnow 04:38, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)

gorseddau

Can this be redirected to this page? Zigzig20s 01:38, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Done. J Milburn 23:05, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Horn of Plenty

I considered wikilinking the Horn of Plenty to the Cornucopia as there are some clear symbolic similarities but wasn't sure so I've left it out. Perhaps it should have links back the other way. EdwardLane (talk) 12:06, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Redundant use of hyperliks

"People are also made ovates or druids as an honour to reward their contributions to Culture of Wales|Welsh culture." (https://en.wikipedia.org/Gorsedd#Ranks)

I removed the hyperlink from the word honour. If there existed a peculiar druidian concept of honour, sure then it'd be relevant to the article. But as it is pertaining to a piece of everyday vocalbulary, making a hyperlink is highly redundant. As well one could give hyperlinks for word "people", the verb "is (<- are)", "reward" etc. etc.

Same thing with the following sentence: "This symbol, called "awen", is often explained as representing the sun."

Again, if "sun" would be pertaining to some page dealing with a specific druidian conception of sun, sure it would be the most relevant. However, the definitions and attributes of sun as a astrofysical body are not related with the subject. Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 18:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Revisionism

The whole article stinks of historical revisionism. The gorsedd was an invention to suit the fashion of the late 18th century, not for modern day nationalists to prove that they are the ones in the right nor was it made for Welsh culture! At the very least, re-research this. 2.101.127.46 (talk) 01:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)Frank Obolobolopoulos

Do you have any suggestions for specific improvements to this article? Daicaregos (talk) 13:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gorsedd. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:32, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Categories: