This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shoy (talk | contribs) at 20:57, 28 November 2017 (Shoy moved page Uranium Acid Mine Drainage to Uranium acid mine drainage: Titles should be sentence case). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

It has been suggested that this article be merged into Acid mine drainage. (Discuss) Proposed since November 2017.

Overview

Uranium Acid Mine Drainage (UAMD) refers to acidic water released from a uranium mining site using processes like underground mining and in-situ leaching. Underground, the ores are not as reactive due to isolation from atmospheric oxygen and water. When uranium ores are mined, the ores as crushed into a powdery substance, thus increasing surface area to easily extract uranium. The ores, along with nearby rocks, may also contain sulfide. Once exposed to the atmosphere, the powdered tailings react with atmospheric oxygen and water. After uranium extraction, sulfide minerals in uranium tailings facilitates the release of uranium radionuclides into the environment which can undergo further radioactive decay while lowering the pH of a solution (Figure 1).

Uranium Chemistry

Naturally, uranium may exist as U in ores but forms the water soluble uranyl ion UO₂ when uranium tailings are oxidized by atmospheric oxygen in the following reaction.

U + O₂ → UO₂

The solubility of uranium increases under similar oxidizing conditions when it forms uranyl carbonate complexes in the following reaction.

U + O₂ + 2CO₃→

Extraction of uranium from the ore may occur under acid or alkaline leaching processes using sulfuric acid and sodium carbonate respectively. If leached with sulfuric acid, uranyl forms a soluble uranyl sulfate complex in the following reaction. Hydrogen ions in solution react with water to produce hydronium ions which lowers a solution's pH making it more acidic.

UO₂ + 3H₂SO₄ + 1/2 O₂ → + H₂O + 4H

H_(aq) + H₂O_(l) → H₃O_(aq)

During in-situ leaching, uranyl reacts with iron, a common natural oxidant, to produce uranyl trioxide which is further oxidized then leached using alkaline sodium carbonate in the following reactions.

UO₂ + 2Fe → UO₂ + 2Fe

UO₂ + 1/2 O₂ → UO₃

UO₃ + 3Na₂CO₃ + H₂O → + 4Na + 2NaOH

This is a user sandbox of Uranium acid mine drainage. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. Get Help

This template should only be used in the user namespace.This template should only be used in the user namespace.

When considering the formation secondary uranium minerals, as discussed in the case study section below, pH of the solution that the uranophane is in is one of the determining factors of how much of the uranophane is in mineral form or in the form of its ions. Shown in figure 2, from a study performed by Tatiana Shvareva et al. in 2011, is the dissolution of uranophane, in pH of 3 (Figure 3b) and pH of 4 (Figure 3a). The graphs demonstrate that in a more acidic environment, the concentrations of Ca, U and Si are more likely to be greater than in more basic environments where it is more likely they will form minerals. This is likely to happen when the acidic mine drainage is released into rivers or large water deposits and become diluted to a pH closer to that of water.

The Enthalpies of formation (from elements and from oxide species) and Gibbs free energies of formation (from elements) of the uranium minerals boltwoodite, Na-boltwoodite, and uranophane are shown in Table 1. Solubility constants (dissociation of minerals to ions) of the same minerals, determined using a bomb calorimeter in a study by Shvareva, Tatiana et al. in 2011, are shown in Table 2. The Gibbs free energies of formation show that the process, when the reactions from the individual elements to the oxides are taken into account, is Spontaneous. The enthalpies of formation, when only considering the reaction from the oxides to the mineral, suggest a relatively high probability for their Gibbs free energy of formation values to also be spontaneous.

Table 1. The enthalpy of formation (from oxide to mineral), enthalpy of formation (from individual elements to mineral), and Gibbs free energy (from individual elements to mineral) of boltwoodite, Na-boltwoodite, and uranophane.

	log Ksp ± 2σ	Mass action equations
Boltwoodite: K(UO2)(HSiO4):H2O	4.12 (-0.48/+0.30)	Ksp =  ${\displaystyle {\frac {}{}}}$
Na-boltwoodite: Na(UO2)(HSiO4):H2O	6.07 (-0.16/+0.26)	Ksp = ${\displaystyle {\frac {}{}}}$
Uranophane: ½	10.82 (-0.62/+0.29)	Ksp = ${\displaystyle {\frac {}{}}}$

Table 2. Solubility constants and mass action equations for boltwoodite, Na-boltwoodite, and uranophane.

UAMD Case Study

Two uranium mines in northern Portugal, Quinta do Bispo and Cunha Baixa, have been inactive since 1991. Acidic water is pumped out of the mines for neutralization and precipitation of radionuclides using calcium hydroxide. Studies in 2002 found that there were high concentrations of soluble and suspended uranium radionuclides in river water samples near the mines. Castelo river reached suspended uranium isotope concentrations of -72 kBq/kg which is roughly 170x higher than normal concentrations in the Mondego River but returned back to normal after 7 km. The mine waters of Quinta do Bispo and Cunha Baixa had low pH values at 2.67 and 3.48 with U-238 concentrations of 92,000 mBq/L and 2,200 mBq/L, respectively.

Results from studies done in 2002 showed a significant negative correlation between both dissolved uranium radionuclides and hydrogen ions with pH in mine waters (Figure 4). Sorption of dissolved uranium radionuclides in rivers combine with nearby rock sediments can form minerals like Uranophane for example. The chemistry and findings in this case is essentially representative of other uranium mines in the world.

Uranium Radionuclides in the Environment

A uranium radionuclide is a radioactive isotope. Radioactivity is natural in the environment, however uranium radionuclides can lead to radioactive decay.In the case of uranium mines, these radionuclides can leach into the water and cause the radioactivity to be carried elsewhere, as well as form precipitates that can be harmful to the environment. The uranium radionuclides can eventually be carried to fruits and vegetables via contaminated waters. Sulfuric acid, oxidation, and alkaline leaching are processes of how radionuclides make their way into the environment. When uranium decays it also produces the isotopes Ra and Rn, which may be environmentally harmful. Three different radioactive isotopes of uranium are uranium-238, uranium-235, and uranium-234. Each has a different half life which determines the isotope's decay rate. When uranium-235 combines with other molecules it creates a chemical reaction that can cause detrimental effects to water. Even though isotope formation occurs naturally, when combined with other elements it can cause the pH of water to become more acidic as discussed previously.

References

1. Virginia, Committee on Uranium Mining in; Resources, Committee on Earth; Council, National Research (2011-12-19). Potential Environmental Effects of Uranium Mining, Processing, and Reclamation. National Academies Press (US).
2. ^ Abdelouas, A. (2006-12-01). "Uranium Mill Tailings: Geochemistry, Mineralogy, and Environmental Impact". Elements. 2 (6): 335–341. doi:10.2113/gselements.2.6.335. ISSN 1811-5209.
3. ^ Shvareva, Tatiana Y.; Mazeina, Lena; Gorman-Lewis, Drew; Burns, Peter C.; Szymanowski, Jennifer E.S.; Fein, Jeremy B.; Navrotsky, Alexandra. "Thermodynamic characterization of boltwoodite and uranophane: Enthalpy of formation and aqueous solubility". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 75 (18): 5269–5282. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2011.06.041.
4. Pereira, Wagner de Souza; Kelecom, Alphonse Germaine Albert Charles; Silva, Ademir Xavier da; Carmo, Alessander Sá do; Júnior, Delcy de Azavedo Py. "Assessment of uranium release to the environment from a disabled uranium mine in Brazil". Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.11.012.
5. ^ P., Carvalho, Fernando; M., Oliveira, João; Isabel, Faria,. "Alpha Emitting Radionuclides in Drainage from Quinta do Bispo and Cunha Baixa Uranium Mines (Portugal) and Associated Radiotoxicological Risk". Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 83 (5). ISSN 0007-4861.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
6. Mir, Feroz A.; Rather, Sajad A. (2015-04-01). "Measurement of radioactive nuclides present in soil samples of district Ganderbal of Kashmir Province for radiation safety purposes". Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences. 8 (2): 155–159. doi:10.1016/j.jrras.2014.03.006.
7. Chang, Gray. "Calculation of Radioactive Decay Rate of 1.00 gram of Natural Uranium in kBq". ataridogdaze.com. Retrieved 2017-11-28.
8. Carvalho, Fernando P.; Oliveira, João M.; Faria, Isabel (November 2009). "Alpha emitting radionuclides in drainage from Quinta do Bispo and Cunha Baixa uranium mines (Portugal) and associated radiotoxicological risk". Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 83 (5): 668–673. doi:10.1007/s00128-009-9808-3. ISSN 1432-0800. PMID 19590808.

• Articles to be merged from November 2017