User talk:WarHawk - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ehheh (talk | contribs) at 14:49, 23 October 2006 (3RR). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 14:49, 23 October 2006 by Ehheh (talk | contribs) (3RR)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Supreme_cmdr please stop using this SPA and sock puppet and wait till the ban on your account stops. Please do not revert whole chunks of text as you are doing now. Kerr avon 23:39, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

You cannot be serious. So anyone who edits this page is now Derek Smart, me or someone else? Have you heard of the WP:GF? WarHawk 00:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked for edit warring on Derek Smart for a period of 24 hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Cowman109 00:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Edit warring is clearly getting nowhere on the article. It's much better to discuss instead of simply blindly reverting other user's attempts to improve the state of the article. Thank you. Cowman109 00:27, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Sockpuppet Block

{unblock|I am not a sockpuppet. Seems to me like you have a think against that Supreme_Cmdr fellow because apart from incorrectly blocking him for blanking, you have now once again incorrectly blocked both of us for being sockpuppet. } WarHawk 20:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm reducing this block back down to the ~ 4 hours remaining on the original 24 hour block, since CheckUser has refuted the sockpuppetry allegation. Mango juice 20:39, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Autoblock

{unblock-auto|204.13.5.61|Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "WarHawk". The reason given for WarHawk's block is: "Edit warring...".}

I removed the autoblock. Things should be working fine now. Cowman109 15:07, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Its all good now.WarHawk 18:22, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Note that you're at four reverts on the Derek Smart article for today. Ehheh 14:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)