Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 207.47.122.10 (talk) at 02:14, 17 October 2006 (→DoM Whitewashing). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Previous discussions:

• Archive 1 (21 July 2005 to 14 October 2005)
• Archive 2 (15 October 2005 to 31 December 2005)
• Archive 3 (1 Janurary 2006 to 30 April 2006)

Arbitration Case

Dominion of Melchizedek and associated articles, shall be semi-protected. If necessary, Johnski (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), or any other editor believed by an administrator to be a sockpuppet or meatpuppet of Johnski, may be blocked indefinitely by any administrator. The article may be unprotected (and reprotected) at the discretion of any admin who deems it safe to do so.Davidpdx 00:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Helpful if you actually link the decision Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Johnski/Proposed_decision, so people don't just have to take your word for it.--Isotope23 18:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

categories according to definitions in Misplaced Pages

How can this be a criminal organization? Wouldn't some court of law first have to make this determination? The cases I can find involving people of DOM never make any determination about Melchizedek.

http://en.wikipedia.org/Criminal_organization

People convicted of organized crime as a category also seems a little excessive because a racketeering conviction does not necessarily result from organized crime, unless the indictment states that there was organized crime. I can't see where organized crime was used as the basis for a racketeering cause of action in any of the cases mentioned. "Racketeering" can also be used as a cause of action in a civil case and does not necessarily mean "organized crime".

http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:People_convicted_of_organized_crime

If those responsible for adding DOM to these categories can, please give references that substantiate same. (unsigned by user:70.137.153.72 16:31, September 25, 2006) 70.137.153.72 16:34, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Guess who's back Davidpdx 20:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

DoM Whitewashing

It appears our serial DoM whitewasher is back yet again after conducting several "test" edits throughout the month. This is the same pattern that the person has used in the past before starting a revert war. Davidpdx 02:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

If you are referring to my last revert, that is not whitewashing, but what you are doing is attempted "brainwashing". Good day. 207.47.122.10 05:12, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

First of all, I have asked you not to leave messages on my talk page. Any further messages will be considered harrassment and I will report it.

Second of all, if you look at the definition of brainwashing in Misplaced Pages, it will describe exactly what you've tried to do the last year and a half. Here is an excerpt for you:

"Brainwashing, also known as thought reform or re-education, is the application of coercive techniques to change the beliefs or behavior of one or more people usually for political or religious purposes."

You can continue to try to post your tripe, but know that people are keeping an eye out for you. Davidpdx 08:58, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure if you're the one that added it, but if you are so right, show me any legitimate source that states that anyone in the article has been convicted of being an organized crime figure, or that the DOM has been proven to be an organized criminal enterprise. If you can't provide this, your inclusion of these categories is brainwashing, plain and simple. 207.47.122.10 02:13, 17 October 2006 (UTC)