This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kundan After Sundown (talk | contribs) at 18:18, 18 October 2006 (→Frivolous warnings). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:18, 18 October 2006 by Kundan After Sundown (talk | contribs) (→Frivolous warnings)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Pronunciation of Thiruvananthapuram
Hi, I found your message on my talk page. The IPA equivalent of Thiruvananthapuram is : ˈθiɹʊvanan'θapˌʊɹam
This will be very hard for the normal readers to digest. And thats why i added the simple phonetics in the article. Moreover, the ogg file is attached so that, the users can hear it pronouncing.
-Regards, -- Rajith Mohan :-) 11:05, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Pls explain why you feel those sentences are "weasel" & tasteless ??-Bharatveer 10:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- pls see WP:WEASEL and understand the meaning of that word.This sentence The promulgation of "Temple Entry Proclamation" (1936), an act that underlined social emancipation is not "weaselly" , "misleading" or "vague" in anyway.
- How can this sentence With the establishment of Thumba Equatorial Rocket Launching Station (TERLS) in 1962, Thiruvananthapuram became the cradle of India's ambitious space programme . which aptly suggests the development of India's space programme be an out of place metaphor?
- I removed the cleanup tag because as per my wiki experience ,I felt that tag was unnecessary.-Bharatveer 11:03, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Pls explain why you feel those sentences are "weasel" & tasteless ??-Bharatveer 10:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- The cleanup tag is not needed in the Thiruvananthapuram article. Plese see Talk:Thiruvananthapuram for the reasons. -- Rajith Mohan :-) 16:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
That was not a fraud website. It is a website of the Ministry of Tourism, Government of India. Check out their home page. -- Rajith Mohan :-) 17:03, 15 October 2006 (UTC).
It is.. See their home page too.. Note the declaration part also : " TourismInIndia.com is the Original Website of the Ministry of Tourism, designed and developed by Inet India Solutions Pvt. Ltd. in 1999
Any unauthourised duplication of this site is strictly prohibited and liable to prosecution. ans zw "
Dear frnd, you cannot just assume things. Ministry of Tourism is promoting several sites under its control. If you are googling using the key words, "Ministry of Tourism India", the first web page you will be getting is this link. I dont think that any site can just claim that it is run by Government of India, and be listed in the top position in google for months!! Moreover, many telephone numbers in the site are not updated, indicating the charecteristics of a typical gov.site(lol)... Your effort to improve the quality of the article is really appreciated. But be positive rather than being negetive always. For instance, try to find more sources rather than just fixing a source tag. Fix the tag, if you are not able to find a reference. Your tag about Swati Thirunal and violin is very much accurate. See the talk page and the to-do list and help in completing the project. Thanks in advance, -- Rajith Mohan :-) 17:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Deepu's RFA
I just added my opinion on the username issue in Deepu's RFA (which is just what I have told you before) but I do hope you don't get into more trouble because of it.
Sarvavijnanakosam still hasn't reached "Tha", has it ? Tintin (talk) 09:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- I am aware of Viswavijnanakosam but I meant the Sarvavijnakosam which the State Encyclopaedia Institute has been publishing for a very long time now. It is intended to be a 20 volume book and last heard, they had reached 12 or so. That is more comprehensive that Viswavijnanakosam. Re. Viswavijnanakosam,, I think there is an edition that came out in around 1990. DC Books' 4-volume Akhilavijnanakosam and this came out at around the same time but my father bought Akhilavijnanakosam. Re. name, I am not going to bother any longer. Malayalam editing thanne matuthu :-( Tintin (talk) 13:01, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Socialist_Unity_Centre_of_India
I'm afraid that this edit without sources may be propagating some kind of slander - do you have sources which show that these people made such comments about the other party? Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 04:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Ignore all rules
Please read it carefully. Thanks. --Bhadani 15:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Frivolous warnings
Not nice. - CrazyRussian talk/email 18:12, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Of course, of course. Kundan After Sundown 18:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC)