This is an old revision of this page, as edited by O1lI0 (talk | contribs) at 22:32, 11 February 2018 (→Statement by {Non-party}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:32, 11 February 2018 by O1lI0 (talk | contribs) (→Statement by {Non-party})(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Shortcut
Requests for arbitration
Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
] | 11 February 2018 | 0/0/0 |
Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
---|---|---|---|
Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.
Arbitrator motionsMotion name | Date posted |
---|---|
Arbitrator workflow motions | 1 December 2024 |
Shortcuts
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|
Too many wrong accusation of disruptive editing by User:O1lI0
Initiated by Le Petit Chat (talk) at 22:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Le Petit Chat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- O1lI0 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
Statement by Le Petit Chat
It seems that this user is frequently accusing other wikipedians of making unconstructive edits. It is the 2nd times he reverted my modifications on two differents articles including . Therefore I demand the administrators to block him definitivly, since User_talk:O1lI0#January_2018 72-hours blocking wasn't enough --Le Petit Chat (talk) 22:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Statement by O1lI0
Statement by {Non-party}
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
- Can you explain ? Or
- You delete the reference source, and then change the data without a reference source.O1lI0 (talk) 22:31, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Too many wrong accusation of disruptive editing by User:O1lI0: Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
Too many wrong accusation of disruptive editing by User:O1lI0: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)