This is an old revision of this page, as edited by E.M.Gregory (talk | contribs) at 11:51, 25 April 2018 (d). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:51, 25 April 2018 by E.M.Gregory (talk | contribs) (d)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Ramallah pornography controversy
- Ramallah pornography controversy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTNEWS, no WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE, lack of WP:INDEPTH, and no WP:LASTING. What we basically have here is a single day news cycle item (a minor aspect of the takeover of Ramallah in Operation Defensive Shield) - a Palestinian allegation, and an Israeli denial - which wasn't all that widely covered even at the time (this was a "side item" covered for its novelty in the midst of more notable events (casualties, change of control of territory, etc.). Subsequent to the single news cycle, this appeared as a one sentence mention in a yearly state department report (which compiles just about all media mentions from the year), and some very sparse similar one-liner coverage elsewhere. Icewhiz (talk) 06:29, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 06:35, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 06:35, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 06:35, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 06:35, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Well sourced article mentioned in numerous reliable sources. However I would not be opposed to a Merge with Operation Defensive ShieldApolloCarmb (talk) 07:26, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:06, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:06, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:06, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV - there has been neither widespread nor in-depth coverage of this alleged "controversy" either when it occurred or since. All that has ever existed are brief report in AFP in which individuals (including an individual employed at the U.S. consulate) speaking in the heat of the moment allege that Israeli soldiers briefly broadcast pornography over Palestinian TV in Ramallah during fighting in Ramallah in the Second Intifada, and official Israeli denials that this did not happen. There was a 2-sentence report in the New York Times framing the incident as "Palestinians accused Israeli forces..." "The Israeli Army said soldiers interrupted the station's broadcasting but had not substituted pornography for the usual programming." The mere handful of subsequent "reports" merely echo the original AFP claim that local residents claimed that this occurred. But little notice has been taken since, none INDEPTH and some misleadingly cited. For example, one mention is cited in a collection of essays edited by Philip Seib, but the allegation ought to be cited to the even less notable author of the essay in question, Orayb Aref Najjar. A source that throws real light on this AfD is "Lies and Disinformation as a Palestinian Weapon", published by the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA,) two weeks after this alleged event; the MFA enumerates 14 alleged occurrences in the same disturbance, describing them, including this one, as "a few examples of fabrications disseminated by the Palestinians." This certainly fails WP:EVENT, and, given that we have only allegations made during a moment of violent unrest - and no evidence that it became a "controversy" - it should not be on Misplaced Pages at all.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:51, 25 April 2018 (UTC)