Misplaced Pages

Women in the Hebrew Bible

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jytdog (talk | contribs) at 22:15, 19 May 2018 (Religious privileges of women: nothing here but primary source citations; this is WP:OR/SYN). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:15, 19 May 2018 by Jytdog (talk | contribs) (Religious privileges of women: nothing here but primary source citations; this is WP:OR/SYN)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (October 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The views of women presented in the Hebrew Bible (also called Tanakh in Judaism, Old Testament in Christianity and Taurat/Tawrah in Islam) are complex and often ambivalent. The question of women's status relative to men in the society depicted in the biblical books, i.e. Iron Age and Hellenistic era Judea, remains a central and controversial issue.

The Genesis creation accounts have been used to deprecate women on the authority of the Bible: Jews and Christians, throughout their history, have used the story of Adam and Eve to justify the inferior status for women. Thus, Paul and other early Christians looked to the Adam and Eve story to put the blame for the Fall on Eve and derived from that the conclusion that women should not be allowed to hold positions of authority or to teach.

Creation narratives

This article contains too many or overly lengthy quotations. Please help summarize the quotations. Consider transferring direct quotations to Wikiquote or excerpts to Wikisource. (September 2010)

The creation of Adam and Eve is narrated from somewhat different perspectives in Genesis 1:26–27 and Genesis 2:24. The Genesis 1 narration declares the purpose of God, antedating the creation of the sexes. It has been called the "non-subordinating" view of woman. God gave the human pair joint responsibility and "rulership" over his creation.

Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground." So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.

— Genesis 1:26-27

Genesis 5:1–2 reaffirms that perspective and has been described as interpretative of that decree of God's initial purpose.

When God created man, he made him in the likeness of God. He created them male and female and blessed them. And when they were created, he called them "man" .

— Genesis 5:1-2

The Genesis 2 narrative has been called the "subordinating view" of woman for two reasons: man is created first, and woman is created out of man.

...But for Adam (or the man) no suitable helper was found. So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man's ribs (or "took part of the man's side") and closed up the place with flesh. Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib (or "took part of the man's side") he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man. The man said, "This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called 'woman,' for she was taken out of man." For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.

— Genesis 2:20b-24, NIV

"…for Adam there was not found an help meet for him." Gen. 2:20b "…no suitable helper was found" (NIV). The word translated "suitable" (kenegdo) means "face to face" and denotes equality and adequacy. Woman for centuries has been instructed to be an "helpmeet" for her husband. However, any text search of both Old and New Testaments (every translation) will demonstrate that the noun "helpmeet" does not appear anywhere in the Bible. It has become a distorted contraction of the two KJV words, the noun "help" and the adverb "meet," the latter being Shakespearian English for "corresponding to" or "suitable," a phenomenon that has been corrected in all later translations.

Although the Genesis 2 passage is often cited as biblical evidence that subordination represents God’s will for women, theologian Roger Nicole disagrees. He believes women's place in the home, in society, and in the church is not an issue that can be conclusively determined by a few apparently restrictive passages. He writes that the starting point must be at the creation of humanity, as Jesus himself exemplified by quoting Genesis 1:27 and Genesis 2:24 in response to a question by the Pharisees.Matt. 19:4–5 Mk. 10:6–7

The Fall of humanity

Main article: Fall of man

Eve's weakness has been blamed for causing Adam's fall, and thus for humanity's fall into original sin. This claim was frequently made during the Middle Ages and was a subject in John Milton's classic epic, Paradise Lost.

There is no mention of subordination in scripture until the end of Genesis 3:16. There, God explains what will become the natural consequences of the woman's disobedience, now that they both are in a fallen (sinful) state: "He will rule over you." For eons this has been colloquially called "The Curse."

However, theologian Nicole does not see it that way: arguing that the passage is not a commandment, but a prophecy that has been fulfilled extensively over the centuries in all the earth. Whatever we may do to alleviate God’s curse is legitimate in the matter of subordination, no less than in providing some relief from the pains of the delivery of children (3:16) and the sweat in cultivating the ground and earning a living (3:17–19).

In addition, those who argue that Judaism is founded upon patriarchal principles point out that religious and governmental authority within Jewish cultures has usually been restricted to the male gender.

However, even in the Jewish Scriptures there are countercurrents to this patriarchal emphasis. For example, "God said, ‘Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over ’. So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them."Genesis 1:26–27 implying that male and female are both "in God's image".

Double standard and male priority

The status of woman in the Old Testament is not uniform. According to classicist Edith Hamilton, the Old Testament writers considered women just as impartially as they did men, free from prejudice and even from condescension. In the Decalogue (Ten Commandments) of Exodus 20, both male priority and gender balance can be seen. In the tenth commandment, a wife is depicted in the examples of a neighbor's property not to be coveted: house, wife, male or female slave, ox or donkey, or any other property. In this perspective, wife along with other properties belongs to the husband. On the other hand, the fourth commandment does not make any distinction between honor to be shown to parents: "father and your mother." This is consistent with the mutual respect shown for both parents throughout the Old Testament.

Double standard and male priority can also be seen in Moses' orders on what to do with the captured Midianites: "Kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately. But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves."Num. 31:17–18 The women of Israel were most honored and influential within the family. They gained considerable respect on the birth of her first child, especially if it was a male child.Gen. 16:4 29:31–30:24 Even here, she was honored because of her function of providing a male heir, not because of her value as a person.

On a positive note, Proverbs 1:8 tells a son not to reject his mother's teaching, and Proverbs 31:10–31 eulogizes the ideal wife, even though she is idealized for her hard labor for her family. The laws of inheritance favored the male. A male Hebrew slave was freed after six years of servitude, while a different set of rules covered female slaves.Ex. 21:1–11 If a man rapes an unbetrothed virgin, he must pay her father 50 shekels of silver and then marry her.Deut. 22:28–29 Judges 19 records a most degrading use of a daughter by her father. "The gruesome story of his using his concubine to protect himself defies imagination." Infidelity to God is portrayed as an "adulteress," not an "adulterer."

Judges and prophets

Scripture portrays Rebekah, Rahab, Deborah, Jael, Judith, and Esther and their contributions to the nation of Israel with faithfulness and extreme candor. These women are represented in the Old Testament as multidimensional human beings – self-reliant, resourceful, influential, and courageous – but at the same time capable of resorting to morally questionable means in order to accomplish their ends.

Distinctions were usually made between men and women during the Old Testament period. Only men were required to attend the annual festivalsEx. 23:17 Lev. 23 though women were permitted to attend if they chose to do so due to unweaned children.1 Sam. 1:9 1:21–22 The Mosaic Law recognized women’s responsibilities at home as wives and mothers. However, this did not prohibit women from all religious service. Women served at the door of the Tabernacle.Ex. 38:8 Both men and women contributed their valuables for use in the building of the Tabernacle.Ex. 35:22–26 The Laver for ministry in the court of the tabernacle was made of brass from the mirrors of the women only.

Deborah was a prophetess who actually judged Israel.Judges 4:4 When the Israelite men lacked faith in yahuah to assume leadership, Deborah shamed Barak, the military commander of Israel’s army, for failing to assume his God-given leadership. Ultimately, he refused to advance against the enemy without Deborah’s presence and commanding influence (Judges 4:8).

Huldah, a married prophetess2 Ki. 22:13–20 interpreted the Book of the Law found during the renovation of the Temple, a book that had been lost for centuries and therefore neglected. She was trusted by Josiah, king of Judah, to be the one to verify the authenticity of the Book of the Law. Huldah’s husband was keeper of the wardrobe in the court.

See also

References

  1. ^ Starr, L. A. The Bible Status of Woman. New York: Fleming H. Revell, 1926
  2. ^ Stagg, Evelyn and Frank. Woman in the World of Jesus. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1978
  3. ^ Nicole, Roger. "Biblical Egalitarianism and the Inerrancy of Scripture." Priscilla Papers, Vol. 20, No. 2. Spring 2006
  4. From misunderstanding of the phrase an help meet for him, a helper suitable for him (Adam), in Genesis 2:18, referring to Eve. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition, 2003.
  5. Smith, Russell E. Jr. "Adam's Fall." ELH: a Journal of English Literary History, Vol. 35, No. 4 (Dec., 1968), pp. 527-539
  6. Quoted in Tanner, Stephen L. Women in Literature of the Old Testament. University of Idaho, 1975. ERIC ED112422.
  7. The Book of Judith is not deemed canonical in the Tanakh nor in the Protestant versions of the Old Testament. It is placed among the apocryphal writings by Jerome in the Vulgate.
  8. Tanner, Stephen L. Women in Literature of the Old Testament. University of Idaho, 1975. ERIC ED112422.
  9. "Kinship in Ancient Israel." http://moses.creighton.edu/simkins/201/cmat/kinship.html
  10. http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=187&letter=D Jewish Encyclopedia: Deborah
  11. http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=187&letter=H Jewish Encyclopedia: Hulda
Categories: