This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bakasuprman (talk | contribs) at 16:58, 28 October 2006 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:58, 28 October 2006 by Bakasuprman (talk | contribs) (→[])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Krrish 2
Film has not been officially announced, director has confirmed that project may be scrapped, therefore, I propose this article deleted. Visual planet 17:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - I cant find much of an argument to keep it around. Article has almost no content and wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Chris Kreider 17:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete If it's not out yet and not confirmed, then what's the point of an article? Wiki is an encyclopedia for facts, not speculation (unless it's some theory or other on a topic of fact).— Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.230.141.109 (talk • contribs)
- Delete - Per above. --Kf4bdy 18:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - The Krrish page trivia section mentions the possibility of a followup movie. Since this is all the information currently listed on the page under debate, I agree with the above posts. -bobby 18:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Misplaced Pages is not for speculation. Hello32020 19:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Well, I think adding notice saying that movie is not official announced yet, will be great. (the notice is already added) and moreover, Rakesh Roshan has told that he might make the movie. So, all these factors makes this article not be deleted yet. I think we should wait for some more news. User:Bunty02, time 15:46 (IST).
- Delete - Hey, Hang on! the template Template:Future film says that "THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT FUTURE OR EXPECTED FILMS". So, what's the matter. Krrish 2 is expected film, isn't it?
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.--thunderboltz 14:20, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - Nobleeagle has added enough to cement notability.Bakaman Bakatalk 16:58, 28 October 2006 (UTC)