Misplaced Pages

:Administrators' noticeboard/Personal attacks - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Durova (talk | contribs) at 22:40, 28 October 2006 (New reports: moving 2 new reports to active). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:40, 28 October 2006 by Durova (talk | contribs) (New reports: moving 2 new reports to active)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles and content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards


    Red crossThis is a failed proposal.
    Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump.
    This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
    Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump.
    ShortcutThis page is intended to get attention quickly when dealing with personal attacks. It is not intended to serve as a form of mediation or a type of RFC. Only Personal attacks are dealt with on this page, on their own merits in accordance with Misplaced Pages's No Personal Attacks policy

    For editors who want a personal attack situation reviewed:

    1. Consider that in most cases, ignoring the attack is better than requesting sanction against the attacker. Do not report people if you are likewise guilty of hostility towards them.
    2. Make sure the user has actually commited a personal attack. (Please note that "personal attacks" are defined only under the WP:NPA policy. If a statement is not considered a personal attack under the intended spirit of this policy, it does not belong here.)
    3. The editor must have been warned earlier. The {{npa2}}, and {{npa3}} templates may be appropriate for new users; for long-term editors, it's preferable to write something rather than using a standard template. Reports of unwarned editors may be removed.
    4. If the behavior hasn't stopped, add the following header to the New Reports section of this page in the following format:
      ==={{User|NAME OF USER}}=== replacing NAME OF USER with the user name or IP address concerned, with a brief reason for listing below. Be sure to include diffs.
    5. If an editor removes the IP or username and doesn't handle the matter to your satisfaction, take it to the editor's talk page or the administrators' noticeboard, but do not re-list the user here.
    6. NB - Due to misunderstanding of these instructions and/or mis-use of this process, comments not in strict adhereance to these instructions WILL be removed. This page deals only with personal attacks under the policy WP:NPA. Reports deemed to be inappropriate for this page are liable to be moved to an appropriate venue where one exists.


    For those reported on this page:

    1. A reviewer or an administrator will review each report on this page. In dealing with the report, the contribution history of the reported user shall be checked along with the diffs provided in the report. Where no personal attack is evident, then no action will be taken - however, should an administrator see that another seperate issue is evident, appropriate action or advice for that issue may be taken/given at his or her discretion and in line with wiki policy.
    2. Reports on this page stand on their own merits in accordance with Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. As such, disputes and discussions over reports are not suitable for this page except for such comments left by admins or reviewers describing their actions and/or findings. If you notice your account reported at this page, please trust that the administrators and reviewers dealing with reports will deal with it in an even-handed and fair manner on the basis of policy alone. If you feel strongly that another "side to the story", issue, or another piece of information is missing from a report please refrain from posting here, and instead leave your comment on your talk page under the title NPA Report or another other clear and related title. The reviewing party will see this message and take it into account where applicable.

    For users handling assistance requests:

    1. For each of the users linked here, open their contributions and check for personal attacks. Also check if the users have been sufficiently warned for the current personal attack and whether they've continued to commit personal attacks after being warned.
    2. Note that there is an important difference between a user who makes many good contributions and a few personal attacks, and a user whose last edits are (nearly) all personal attacks or other conflict.
    3. Do nothing, warn them again, or, if you are an adminstrator, block the user in question as you think is required. Explain things carefully to the user who listed the attacker if you feel there's been a misunderstanding.
    4. Move the report to the Open Reports section and give an update to the status of the report.
    5. Delete old reports that have been dealt with.

    Please consider adding this page to your watchlist to make life easier for non-administrator RC-patrollers.


    New reports

    Nandesuka

    User is adopting an aggressive pattern in Talk:Online_creation. User has twice accused me of sockpuppetry, and refuses to allow me to defend myself. Corporate fudiciary 22:21, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

    Please supply page diffs. Durova 22:27, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

    Open reports

    BusterD (talk · contribs)

    I have been accused of making personal attacks on User:Getaway while trying to prevent that user from reapplying personal birthdate and minor traffic violations for a non public living person Al Gore III article. Discussion has been going on in a rather heated way. Like many participants in the discussion, I have pointed out to user that his or her polarizing tone was not productive. Further, I reverted this information a total of three times in four edits. The last two times I used vandalism rollback, because BLP was violated, per consensus (6-2 in talk, by my count, 4-2-2 by another count). Since that time, user has again added the material, so he's in 4RR, but I'm concerned about the accusation of a personal attack. For my part, I believe I've kept the tone neutral and to behaviors, not about personalities. If I've made any mistake, I'm interested in knowing how I erred. BusterD 19:29, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

    FWIW, the victim of the "personal attack" has been continually trolling that talk page for the past week. Hopefully things have settled down now. Kaldari 21:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
    I believe that Kaldari comments do BusterD a disservice. He is defending BusterD's personal attacks on me calling me a "troll". There you have it.--Getaway 00:09, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

    Whew, I've just caught up with the talk page. Personal attack quotient is minor, but this is quite a dispute. Let's keep this civil and turn down the volume. I'm protecting the page. Durova 03:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

    In any event, I can't fault User:Durova for any tardiness; I accidentally placed the first posting in the wrong place, incorrectly reading page instructions (there weren't any to see in New Reports, so I skipped the section). Once the notice was moved to the redflag location, Durova responded quickly to protect the page. BusterD 04:26, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
    Unprotected per the request of the editors. Durova 17:15, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

    69.252.201.61 (talk · contribs)

    MastCell 18:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

    Already blocked 31 hours by another admin. Durova 02:36, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

    Stevewk (talk · contribs)

    --Francis Schonken 16:06, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

    Tough call. An admin did use the word "bogus" in reply to a complaint about a 3RR report, although Stevewk quoted the word out of context and his discussion of that on an article talk page was inappropriate. I don't think his behavior thus far merits more than an npa2 warning. The 3RR and the npa3 seem to have escalated an edit war. I've protected Republic per his request, which I think is reasonable. I'll also leave a note on his user talk page. Suggest formal mediation. Durova 17:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

    Rat235478683 (talk · contribs)

    This user has made personal attacks against me and a few other users by posting us in a "List of Enemies" on his user page. I warned him with an npa3 template seeing as he had already received a npa2 for a previous incident. Despite this, he has made personal attacks against other users on Talk:Misty (Pokémon). The entire thing is about him wanting the theory that Misty has a crush on Ash put into the Misty article. See diffs for the personal attacks. Also see his user page for the list. Cheers. . THL 00:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

    "Enemies list" removed. Final warning issued. I'm hoping that will suffice; if not, post here or at my user talk for attention. Luna Santin 07:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)


    69.157.105.101 (talk · contribs)

    User has been making personal attacks on the following pages: , , , , , as well as personal attacks in the edit summery box of his edits: and . --Kf4bdy 06:56, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

    More , . --Kf4bdy 07:03, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
    Blocked 24 hours. I would have done it but another admin got there first. Durova 13:29, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

    69.157.102.5 (talk · contribs)

    Seems to be a sock of 69.157.105.101 (talk · contribs). , .--Kf4bdy 07:25, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

    And again --Kf4bdy 07:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
    After a 3 hour block he returned to continue his personal attacks. , , .
    Returned on a different IP address. Durova 13:32, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

    172.147.144.167 (talk · contribs)

    Fired several personal attacks at User:CyberGhostface at his user page (Which I reverted), here and in more locations. Take a look at his contributions for more info. --Bruin_rrss23 (talk) 12:23, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

    Also , .--Kf4bdy 12:34, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
    Blocked for 31 hours. Durova 13:35, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

    65.162.12.103 (talk · contribs)

    Has been making personal attacks in the comments of his edits to Previsualization and all over its talk page. He's already been cautioned on his talk page, but continues to delete and revert material. Can an admin deal with this firmly? Furthermore, is it reasonable at this point to consider these edits vandalism? He just deletes info and calls it ass-kissing, despite attempts at reasonable discussion by other editors (namely myself). Furthermore, slanderous comments made by this editor in the talk page towards one of the names this editor attempts to delete have led this other person to register an account to complain to Misplaced Pages about the matter. Thank you, Girolamo Savonarola 19:52, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

    Please provide diffs as requested in the instructions for this page. Shell 21:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
    Took a look and found this, but I'm inclined to side the anonymous user, as most of his comments weren't direct personal attacks, but strongly disapproving of the content of the article.--Vercalos 21:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
    Not my report but I will assist in providing diffs and a revert war , , , , and . --Kf4bdy 21:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
    24 hour block issued for WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. Durova 22:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

    NBGPWS (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    He has been leaving vague threats on my talk page User_talk:tbeatty. Not sure why. He has a history of disruption from his block log. I personally don't want to deal with it anymore. Please ask him to stop. --Tbeatty 02:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

    See .

    I will be bringing this editor, and another's BLP actions up for Arbcom review. They are on the BLP patrol, but many feel they apply BLP to try and exclude valid sourced criticism. They apply BLP whole classes of people, orgs and even payal! Tbeatty argued that an article which mentioned problems with Paypal fundraising violated the BLP of PayPal!!! He slapped a BIO template on political org. Some feel that these actions are done VERY knowingly, and with a plan and purpose not in accordance with Wikitruth, or whatever it's called. I thought it wise to ask Tbeatty to explain his actions first. He said he had violated WP POINT in the past, when he introduced a list of Suspicious Deaths Associated with President Bill Clinton, admittingly violating Pres Clinton's BLP rights. More documentation coming to the proper venue soon. SEE NBGPWS 04:26, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
    Enough...telling people that they are going to "hear a LOT MORE" is nothing but an unnecessary threat. Based on persistant incivility as demonstrated by previous blocks, I have now blocked NBGPWS for one month.--MONGO 04:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)


    24.14.87.181 (talk · contribs)

    Please see . There was an anon user from Augustana College who recently got upset with me apparently for removing a nn friend of theirs from the list of West Aurora High School notable alumni. See . I don't know if there's any connection or not, but I reverted the edits on West Aurora High School as soon as I found them, and I'm treating it as potential defamation since it was posted to an article, not just talk space. I asked in #wikipedia about where best to bring this to formal attention, and it was suggested that I go ahead and post it here. The only thing that is true is I used to work for that school district, and I shared an office at the school in question. --JohnDBuell 03:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

    If the problem persists on those articles, let me know and i can semi-protect them. But this IP only has two edits total, so unless they continue to use this IP to vandalize, not much need to block them.--MONGO 05:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
    Thanks MONGO. I'm keeping an eye out, so to speak. --JohnDBuell 19:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

    172.134.129.246 (talk · contribs)

    Has made several insulting posts to me, calling me names such as "CyberFuckFace" and "malicious cocksucker" and other such diatribes. I posted a warning on his talkpage, which he removed, telling me to suck his cock.--CyberGhostface 17:44, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

    Already blocked for 24 hours. Shell 20:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
    Categories: