Misplaced Pages talk:Advocacy ducks

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ca2james (talk | contribs) at 20:48, 16 July 2018 (→Banner shell: ?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:48, 16 July 2018 by Ca2james (talk | contribs) (→Banner shell: ?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Advocacy ducks page.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days

This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Misplaced Pages essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Misplaced Pages essays, a collaborative effort to organize and monitor the impact of Misplaced Pages essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.Misplaced Pages essaysWikipedia:WikiProject Misplaced Pages essaysTemplate:WikiProject Misplaced Pages essaysWikiProject Misplaced Pages essays
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Integrity

This page is part of Wikiproject Integrity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on Misplaced Pages having edits by contributors with a monetary obligation to edit the article topic. To participate, you can edit the attached page or contribute further at WikiProject Integrity.IntegrityWikipedia:WikiProject IntegrityTemplate:WikiProject IntegrityIntegrity

Misplaced Pages milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 23, 2015	Miscellany for deletion	Kept

Banner shell

I'd removed the banner shell because at that time it was wrapped around a single wikiproject and the article history milestones. Obviously article history milestones are not a wikiproject and so don't belong in the banner shell. That left a single wikiproject included in the banner shell, which made the banner shell (which refers to *multiple* wikiprojects) incorrect. Obviously now that a second wikiproject apparently associated with this essay has been added, the use of the banner shell is no longer incorrect (weird, maybe, with only two wikiprojects listed, but not incorrect).

Atsme, I don't know why you told me to discuss this on the talk page since I thought my edit summary was quite clear and I hadn't objected to the reintroduction of the banner shell. Next time, please do ask if you have questions. Ca2james (talk) 18:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

My edit summaries are self-explanatory. 19:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Sure, except for the one I linked above which said: "Undid revision 850275608 by Ca2james (talk) added another project - please discuss on TP". So here I am, discussing, but I don't understand why you said to do this and I'm asking for clarity. Did you mean something like "discuss on talk page before reverting?" That's not what your words say, so in the future if that is your meaning, please do say that in your edit summary so that your words match your intent. For the present, could you please explain what you wanted me to discuss? Ca2james (talk) 20:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Categories: