Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dream out loud/Archive 2

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Dream out loud

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by LRG5784 (talk | contribs) at 19:16, 4 November 2006 (Please go with consensus and don't always make choices yourself.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:16, 4 November 2006 by LRG5784 (talk | contribs) (Please go with consensus and don't always make choices yourself.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

NYCS navbox

First, the navbox is maintained by WP:NYCS. I would go there first, as me and Pacific Coast Highway are part of the project. As me and him have reverted it multiple times, I would ask that you go to the WP:NYCS talk page and discuss the issue there. I will not guarantee that people will be so inclined by it. --Imdanumber1 ( Talk | contribs) 13:57, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

No offense, but there is no need to use hex codes. Even User:Pacific Coast Highway disagrees with using them. It makes the whole thing more bloated than it already is. I have reverted it again, so please go to the WP:NYCS talk page and discuss your matters there. Thank you for your cooperation. --Imdanumber1 ( Talk | contribs) 14:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

One of the central tenets of Misplaced Pages is: assume good faith. In other words, even when we disagree with someone, we should assume that they truly have the best interests of the encyclopedia at heart.

I am beginning to wonder if the normal good-faith assumption applies to you. You added hex codes to the {{NYCS navbox}} article on the subways project talk page. Two people objected and reverted your edits; nobody agreed.

Now I see that you simply went ahead and added them again anyway. This is not good-faith behavior and may be interpreted as vandalism. You obviously have considerable o the project. I suggest, however, that you try to play as part of a team, instead of unilaterally making changes that are not supported by the community. --Imdanumber1 ( Talk | contribs) 19:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)