This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 82.81.16.213 (talk) at 23:47, 8 November 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:47, 8 November 2006 by 82.81.16.213 (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)November 8, 2006 Retaliation/shelling
Changed this from the former to the latter. No mention in the article of this being Israeli retaliation, and the point of the article is not the context in which it happened but the event itself. Several shells fell, killing eighteen. "Retaliation" sounds POV. Puddleman 21:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
don't belive to the arabs propoganda machine
they know very well how to pose in front of a camera and making themselves "suffering" but,to host terrorists,who know they are "operating" from "civilian" concentrations,knowing that the Israeli Army is the most humane Army in the world,and other armies (like Russian,French,British,and American) don't care about how the "world will respond". so the terrorists keep firing bombs intentionally towards Israeli towns (like Sderot) but Israel,of course,cannot retaliate even with the smallest force,because if they do,it will be a "massecre" right?
I wonder,if Mexico would have done the same thing to America even once,not in the course of 6 years,what the united states would have done...
lets face it,if other Army "accidently" bombs a mosque,or a wedding,no one cares... but if israel will do a 1% of that,the whole world will awake suddenley (this is said not only for this event but also in general)
hypocracy/Antisemitism?