This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yunshui (talk | contribs) at 06:46, 28 February 2019 (→February 2019). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:46, 28 February 2019 by Yunshui (talk | contribs) (→February 2019)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)February 2019
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. M.Bitton (talk) 23:47, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
- M.Bitton, you better stop trolling and lying and go back to the discussion.--AZSH (talk) 00:44, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Please focus your discussion on the content of the article, not on the character of other editors. —C.Fred (talk) 00:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- the discussion about the article should be in the article's talk page not here. thanks --AZSH (talk) 00:54, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- Please focus your discussion on the content of the article, not on the character of other editors. —C.Fred (talk) 00:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:03, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
AZSH (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here AZSH (talk) 01:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui 水 06:46, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
the user M.Bitton has refused to participate in the discussion. --AZSH (talk) 01:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- the user ReconditeRodent has proposed a version which was accepted by me and refused by M.Bitton--AZSH (talk) 01:08, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- ReconditeRodent can you give your opinion about this article's discussion here please? were your proposals at the end really serious? --AZSH (talk) 01:17, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- the user ReconditeRodent has proposed a version which was accepted by me and refused by M.Bitton--AZSH (talk) 01:08, 28 February 2019 (UTC)