This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TrangaBellam (talk | contribs) at 10:37, 12 October 2021 (→Barman (2014): new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:37, 12 October 2021 by TrangaBellam (talk | contribs) (→Barman (2014): new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)India: West Bengal Stub‑class | ||||||||||||||||
|
Barman (2014)
In the pre-colonial literatures (such as Brihatdharma Purana, Brahmabaibartya Purana, Sibayan of Rameswar Bhattacharya and Annadamangal of Bharat Chandra Ray) the Poundras were classified as almost untouchable (as antaja, asatsudra, adhamsankara, etc).
— Barman, Rup Kumar (2014-01-01). "From Pods to Poundra: A Study on the Poundra Kshatriya Movement for Social Justice 1891–1956". Voice of Dalit. 7 (1): 121–138. doi:10.1177/0974354520140108. ISSN 0974-3545.
So many issues in a single line:
- Asatsudra did not mean untouchable in Brh. P. That would make half of the Uttam Sankaras, untouchable. Neither did Antajas/Adhamsankaras who were the lowest of Sudras, but still Sudras. Mlechhas of Brh. P. were the untouchables, being outside of the caste system. Consult Furui (2013) for details.
- Now, it might be that Antajas were practically indistinguishable from Mlechhas but we have no way to be aware of the situation on ground.
TrangaBellam (talk) 10:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Categories: