This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MONGO (talk | contribs) at 20:09, 29 November 2006 (→Sockpuppet watch). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:09, 29 November 2006 by MONGO (talk | contribs) (→Sockpuppet watch)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Threat of bodily harm to WP editor on external forum
Hey. Along the lines of "Defend Each Other", Solidpoint (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) made a threat of bodily harm to editor SWATJester in an external forum (See ANI thread ). It would appear that an indef block on Solidpoint for the threat is called for. I'm dropping this on a few admins talk's to try and resolve quickly, though it's on ANI now. Thanks. Georgewilliamherbert 21:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Empty cat
Also added here: Tom Harrison 21:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
What did I do?
Mongo, Did I say something to insult you again? I really never meant to. Please tell what I said that made you feel bad. I really want to know. --Cplot 23:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Seabhcan
Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Seabhcan. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Seabhcan/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Seabhcan/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Cowman109 23:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
An article in need of your input
The Saddam_Hussein_and_al-Qaeda_timeline article is in serious need of attention. It presents numerous Conspiracy Theories regarding alleged ties between Saddam/Iraq and al Qaeda as fact, when these theories have been refuted, rejected, denied and discounted by the U.S. Government, various U.S. Governmental hearings and commissions, and almost all the respected experts, many of whom are retired U.S. Intelligence. This is a clear case of misusing Wiki to advance fallacious and discredited Conspiracy Theories. Perhaps you could help there. Thanks in advance. - F.A.A.F.A. 00:04, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
SandyGeorgia
Looks like a good admin candidate. 14000 edits with 6000 in mainspace. No blocks. Good eye for BS and lots of article cleanup. --Tbeatty 07:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Looks good to me...maybe see if they are interested in becoming an admin.--MONGO 19:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Still no bumper sticker?
These things are the latest fashion: ArbCom bumper stickers
—Doug Bell 08:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah...I think I'll not advertise...but thanks though. If I did, I'd have tank or or toilet plunger as my pics.--MONGO 09:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- I really wasn't seriously suggesting that you do. I find them a bit silly. Anyway, I replaced the individual links above with the category I created for them so that your talk page won't show up on the "What links here" for the images. —Doug Bell 09:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- No, I didn't mean to be dismissive. Thanks again though.--MONGO 09:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- I really wasn't seriously suggesting that you do. I find them a bit silly. Anyway, I replaced the individual links above with the category I created for them so that your talk page won't show up on the "What links here" for the images. —Doug Bell 09:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Sockpuppet watch
User:67.37.179.61 - Chicago
User:70.8.49.7 - Chicago
User:70.8.151.103 - Chicago
User:68.30.26.171 - Chicago
--Tbeatty 19:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Heh...may have to semi-protect the talkpage if that disruption about "feds" isgoing to continue...maybe best if it does you or someone else puts in a request for semi-protection.--MONGO 19:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)