This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Atlant (talk | contribs) at 12:22, 7 December 2006 (Who to edit?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:22, 7 December 2006 by Atlant (talk | contribs) (Who to edit?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)messages (+) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The basementThanksCSCWEM, I'm just trying to get the hang of this, so thanks for your helpful advice! I've added a couple of citations to the Dave Cavanaugh page, which I hope help to validate it. Gervius 19:03, 8 October 2006 Scholarpedia deletionI was the original author of the article and I was not informed when its deletion was discussed and couldn't comment. I think the discussion was bogus and the deletion was a mistake and should be undone. Thank you, --Ben /C 23:53, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
RfA thanks from StuffOfInterest
User talk:ChadbryantI've decided to come to you on this, this user is always breaking the 3RR and is also always using personal attacks, He also uploads images and adds them to a page and when i tell him why i remove it he ignores it. Yamla blocked me twice for doing what he is doing yet no one has done anything, i even told yamla left a message for him that his is breaking the exact rules that yamla blocked me for and he hasn't done a single thing, his been online twice since ive left the message and his ignored it. This has really annoyed me and proven the singling out point even more. Chadbryant is forever getting away with everything if you check out his talk page and look at the edits you can see it clearly, he has even accused me of vandalising the Adam Copeland page i have never edited that page. Please i'm asking is there anything you can do seeing another admin has turned a blind eye and wont do nothing. Lil crazy thing 17:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC) Blocking 212.85.5.92Hi, Thanks for blocking User:212.85.5.92 again. I'm sorry for all the problems that this IP is causing. However, now that you can block whilst allowing logged-in edits are available, I see no reason to unblock the IP. Consider this free reign to indefinitely block the IP if a single vandalistic edit is made. I will try to explain it to anybody who asks. Thank you, —Daniel (‽) 20:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you clownThough im still abit newbie thank you for locking the page of User talk:86.11.114.114 so other people may see the warning --Andrew Chung 23:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC) SilentWolfWas wondering if you had any thoughts or input regarding this user's current unblock request? Thanks in advance. Luna Santin 06:53, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
The edit to FuckI went to revert it too then checked to be sure - it was a legit edit believe it or not! Ironically I found it as UTFSE :) Glen 10:17, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Simple Misplaced PagesJust want to point you to some vandalism that someone probably wanted you to see. Check this Userpage on Simple Misplaced Pages. Some people just have too much time to waste. zephyr2k 18:00, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Contested speedy deletionsJDoorjam deletion log: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=JDoorjam&page= Alright! I just finished this is a list from September 30th to October 5th I did a re-evaulation for the articles. I did a more extensive research this time and only two article I believe fall into the speedy delete category (Italia Blue and Ava Nova). I thought a few articles were notable enough for AfD, but not speedy delete. Valoem 00:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Back to his old tricks202.182.34.174 is back to his old tricks i.e. offensive vandalism. I think you need to block this guy again, for longer this time.I elliot 02:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC) Sorry of behalf of the jerksHi, this is just to apologise for the idiots at my school (82.198.250.9) and to ay keep the ip blocked; registered users (like me) can still happily edit away :-) --Nipoc 08:29, 12 October 2006 (UTC) Your revertThank you for reverting vandalism in my user page, I was away from the computer and I didn't note it. Again, thank you. Michaelas10 (T|C) 18:38, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Whoops! You missed a spot. Your revert of vandalism done by 66.65.181.100 on 7 November 2006 to Heart rate was not a complete repair. I just fixed it. - Samuel Erau 13:52, 9 November 2006 (UTC) Summary for protecting pagesCould you perhaps use a slightly more descriptive summary when protecting pages, even something as simple as "recent IP vandalism" or "sockpuppetry". This would help us on the other end when looking to unprotect these pages and for future people looking at the protection log. "trying semi-protection" adds no information—it is already obvious semi-protection is being tried—and even the most basic reason about why it is being semi-protected is helpful. —Centrx→talk • 21:37, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
AIV backlogHey, please take a look at WP:ARV. Large backlog Funnyfarmofdoom 22:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Anon users on IranSome anon user reverted you on Iran again, they're mass removing pictures and sourced info. --Mardavich 06:47, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
User:66.155.200.129You asked to be notified before this unblock was removed: 66.155.200.129 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - you've been notified now, if you weren't before. Any more vandal edits I will put it back up on AIV. -Patstuart 16:23, 13 October 2006 (UTC) Kinkaid School vandalismI WHOISed some of the IP addresses that vandalized Kinkaid's article... they trace to the St. John's School in Houston WhisperToMe 22:52, 13 October 2006 (UTC) Vandalism protectionThere is a lot of vandalism on Asshole (disambiguation) page. People put a link on Asshole epithet; putting George W bush or Erika Steinbach as the link instead of asshole(cause they find it funny). You really should protect this page. SamiKaero 17:28, 14 October 2006 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba 16:58, 15 October 2006 (UTC) Image on your UserpageI don't know if it was someone else vandalizing your page, but the other day, you had a big picture of John Wayne Gacy on your userpage, and considering his history, that might offend someone. Just saying, and it might just have been a vandal with a knowledge of serial killers, but you never know. (P.S. Your username is awesome) --BLuToRsE 03:40, 16 October 2006 (UTC) User:Pic BusinessCould you please yet again have words with this user, he is continuing to dish out insults to everyone, he has done it on my talk page again because i revert his edits he made on Mike Knox because his pictures did not have the correct copyrights so i'm within my rights to do that but yet again this is the sort of reply i getalso on a discussion on the john cena talk page this is also the attutide he had with name calling . This stuff from this user is getting terrible now all you have to do is look at his edits and you will see more. Lil crazy thing 06:20, 16 October 2006 (UTC) No no.I meant, I'm sorry I didn't keep reverting it. I would have if I were here. I wasn't trying to call your attention to it, since you clearly know about it. It's a minor thing, i know, but I feel it makes me look like I'm leaving the job half done . HalfShadow 19:22, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank youMy administratorship candidacy succeeded with a final tally of 81/0/1. I appreciate your support. Results are at Misplaced Pages:Recently_created_admins#Durova. And by the way, although I've never said it, I think you've got one of the best usernames at Misplaced Pages. Warmly, Durova 21:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC) User Jwall989Hey, there; I was digging through CAT:RFU, and I'm not quite sure what to make of this user's request. They're indefblocked for vandalism, but have no visible edits and no talk page history; are there deleted edits involved, or anything else I'm missing to have a more complete picture? Or, barring that, do you have any particular disposition on their unblock request? Luna Santin 06:00, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
BlankingHey there CSCWEM, just like to bring to your attention that an anonymous user (user:12.219.37.227) has been constantly blanking any references to xbox 360 from the Unreal Tournament 2007 article for no reason, even though the references are sourced.--Joey Joe Joe Junior Shabadoo 10:50, 18 October 2006 (UTC) Did you email me?Re the username trolls? My reply bounced. I replied: Not a clue. Ummm, one of the Checkuser admins did track them for me a couple weeks ago, and (unlike what I assumed) he's not AOL. We can follow up? Glen 20:19, 18 October 2006 (UTC) Bahnstah
Mistake?Do you know something about the former leaders of this school that I don't? :) Ral315 (talk) 08:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
FortnightsYou can block people for fortnights? Who knew? – ClockworkSoul 18:11, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!Nehwyn has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! Thank you for your tireless work around here. --Nehwyn 19:21, 19 October 2006 (UTC) Someone Else did itSorry clown this is Kuf360 but could you please remove the warning for Ufuk Talay edit because I believe that someone else used my account to make the edit, someone seems to have my password, why would I call myslef a twat, please can you also tell me how I can change my password? Thank you
Opinion soughtHi sleepless. I am contacting you, somewhat at random, as I noticed you have closed several AFD recently and as you are generally regarded as a good admin. The page User:GabrielF/911TMCruft has been serving as a de facto noticeboard for people proposing and following AFD's on a particular topic: 9/11. To an extent has begun to broaden its focus into politically related articles in general, serving as an AFD conservative noticeboard. Among several recent examples, the Yellowcake forgery nomination was listed there as it went on AFD. This sort of private noticeboard strikes me as quite counter to the ideal collaborative and neutral spirit of AFD. I doubt, for example, that we would permit a WP:AFD noticeboard on topic X. Isn't that what AFD itself is for? So, I personally take issue with a user-space page which is serving the same role of co-ordinating editors with a particular outlook. There seems to be quite a lot of pre-discussion among editors watching that page, almost all of it off the relevant article talk pages. An unwiki lack of transparency, in my opinion. Enough intro. What I'd like your opinion about is whether such a userpage is suitable to put through AFD itself. I've never seen such (userpage, not article), but I'm not sure how else to go about getting it deleted. Can it be speedied? Or am I just nuts, and this sort of thing is ok? Disclaimer, I got in a dispute related to the use of this page yesterday. My dislike for the noticeboard led to the dispute, not the reverse. If you have any advice or thoughts to offer, it would be appreciated. If so, please respond here to keep the thread together. Thank you. Derex 08:18, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Plains IndiansThis is falling apart again. (The last version that you reverted to, for example, had a big section Hunting in the plains missing). It needs long term semi-protection but I have asked twice on the Protection page and been turned down each time. Can you help, please? TerriersFan 22:29, 21 October 2006 (UTC) User:Tony larussaNice work, you beat me to the block on this guy. It would be pretty amusing though if I was watching him on TV managing a game of the World Series and he was editting Misplaced Pages at the same time... --W.marsh 01:05, 22 October 2006 (UTC) AO, AB?In the block log, I was wondering what these two letters meant? Also, some of the IPs you edited have not been vandalising multiple articles, eg. Special:Contributions/128.211.233.134. Am I missing something? -Splash - tk 06:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
You know, it's actually fairly important not to ignore people. I can buy the "I'm busy" excuse for a while, even an hour or so. But 3 or 4 hours of solid editing later is really just bordering on rude. What's up? -Splash - tk 18:42, 23 October 2006 (UTC) Allow me to be direct: please stop using silly block lengths. They make life harder for those trying to work out what the hell is going on. Your AO/AB codes are presumably for a bot somewhere to read (yours, perhaps?) after a bot somewhere else has trawled Special:Recentchanges looking for things with "revert" in the summary and blocking IPs on that basis. But the direct part: please try to use intelligible block lengths, even whilst ignoring people. Thank you. -Splash - tk 21:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Bang bangHey quick draw! Hang on while I finish edits before you jump in an revert. 8') The commentary in the article is 'citation needed', not 'delete anything that looks dodgy'. Garglebutt / (talk) 06:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC) New user...This new user sound familiar? --> User:Seandinmammaisback ? hehe Glen 09:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC) WP:Ref Query]]Hello, if I have a suspicion that an author and website owner is editing wikipedia and referencing themselves, would it be a violation of WP:Ref. I’m not going to reveal more because I don’t want to wind up the whole world and I want to tread carefully. Also, if I had a mountain of evidence to prove it, how would I present it and where would I go? Finally in hypothetical terms, let’s say I found out that two published authors and website owners were having quite a well known feud and that it had spilled over wikipedia and that both these articles were using references from each site and each editor were removing them, would that be a breach of anything? At the moment it’s just a strong suspicion and I’ll no doubt have to go through quite a lot of edits but I’d be grateful for your advice. Englishrose 19:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
{{sprotected}}On the assumption that you do at least mentally process what appears on this page, can I just remind you to drop {{sprotected}} on pages you sprotect? Makes maintenance, as you might call it, much easier. Thanks. It worries me more than a little that you hardly ever unprotect things, and without a tag, you must be leaving things protected basically forever. Goodness, I'm starting to worry here. -Splash - tk 22:06, 23 October 2006 (UTC) Fine. I'm not really sure why you refuse point-blank to speak to me. Maybe you might take an edit out of your schedule to write a quick note at instead? -Splash - tk 22:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC) Block of User:204.38.172.102Hi, I've emailed you but haven't gotten a response as of yet (I realize I just emailed you today, but trying to cover my bases). You blocked the IP address 204.38.172.102, who deserves it. The IP address belongs to Whitmore Lake High School, and as such lots of students like humoring themselves with vandalism. However, would it be possible to change the block to allow registered users to continue to make edits? I teach at WLHS and enjoy patrolling the wikispace when I get the chance during the day. Unfortunately, I was unable to make any edits even while logged in because of the block. Thank you, Benwildeboer 22:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
BlocksI respect you for your vandal fighting and hate to leave a message like this, but could we not block users for 299 hours? More than once in the past I've gone to block a user and found his previous block to be some obscure length of time. I have no idea how long 299 hours is and to be honest I've got better things to do than work out your off the wall block lengths. Thanks. -- Steel 23:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Unblock of 216.9.250.6G'day fellow insomniac, I think your 1 month long block on 216.9.250.6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) was a bit of an overreaction to this edit to Rusty trombone which put in context is an article on a sexual position. There's been relatively minor vandalism since the last unblock and all the edits summarised suspiciously as "i can see through time" were newline or whitespace insertion/removal. Are you willing to lift this block? -- Netsnipe ► 05:52, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
WP:UWHi, I see looking at the WikiProject user warnings page, that you are a participant in this project. I have recently started an undertaking to harmonise all user page warnings and templates. For this I would like your assistance. I have listed a number of ideas on the project template page here as a first draft. I fully appreciate that as with most editors and admins, that you are fairly busy. Therefore I am not looking for anyone to carry out the actual work, I am willing to do that myself, with help from a number of other RC Patrollers who have come forward. But what I am looking for is your invaluable input, on the draft ideas and also to suggest other ways you believe we may improve the templates. I do however require the services of a couple of administrators to put into effect some of the new templates, as they are currently protected. Please take 5 mins to look through the new templates page, and both the project and templates talk pages and leave any ideas or suggestions that you may have. Best regards Khukri 09:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC) Antonia Bennett AfDHowdy! I've speedy deleted Antonia Bennett as a clear WP:CSD A7 and failure to meet WP:MUSIC. I'm letting you know because I see that you closed Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Antonia Bennett as Keep. Like my grandfather used to tell me when I was a kid, "Misplaced Pages ain't no dang ol' democracy", so the veritable plethora of Keep 'votes' may have been given undue weight in your decision. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 14:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Auschwitz Concentration CampHi there; I am, of course fully aware of the basic principle underpinning Misplaced Pages - that anyone can edit. But we both know that some articles attract more than their fair share of vandals, and this page is one. I watch it, you obviously watch it and I'm sure many serious editors watch it, but still the idiots come. Four times this evening (in the UK) so far. While there is clearly no justification for a total protection, would not a partial protection to restrict to established users be reasonable? The site of this camp is particularly highly emotively charged for some people, and to see stupid comments inserted into the article, even though only briefly, is deeply disturbing.--Anthony.bradbury 18:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
unblock-autoRegarding HirschiDude (talk • contribs), please don't be so hasty to decline or be paranoid. I know a lot of users are using {{unblock-auto}} when they aren't technically autoblocked because MediaWiki:Blockedtext has instructed them to use it in the first place. Most of the time they just had their underlying IP addresses blocked since they're either sharing a proxy server or a pool of dynamic IP addresses with another anonymous IP vandal. I tend to assume good faith and unblock their IP address and reset/shorten it as an AO block unless there's a firm correlation between the account's editing history and vandalism to the same articles as an anon. Anyway, if you use the unblock link for the IP address in the template, it'll record their username in the IP address's block log like our very own unofficial Checkuser, so that if it the same person is creating a lot of vandal sockpuppets and asking for autoblocks to be lifting, the pattern will be very obvious in the block log and we can call in Checkuser to do the rest. I've nailed a few vandal sockpuppeteers using this unblock-auto trick already. Cheers. To answer your question on HirschiDude's talk page (now removed), his IP address belong to the ISP Road Runner which is well known for not assigning static IP addresses to its residential customers. -- Netsnipe ► 22:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Pine Crest SchoolHi there. You took out the comments under "Significant Academic Acheivements" on the Pine Crest School page. These comments were: In the 2006-2007 school year, Pine Crest School ranks as first place in the state of Florida for number of 2007 National Merit Semifinalists. Twenty-nine Pine Crest Students out of a class of 203 students have received the honor of National Merit Semifinalist. I don't see any direct "source" about the Presidential Scholars etc. and I know the Pine Crest website lacks most of the information that is found on the page. What kind of sources do you need? I go to Pine Crest and know the above statements to be correct. It was published in our school newsletter "Columns" although I've thrown that out and thus don't know the volume number etc. I dont understand why this accomplishment needed a source and the others don't? Also The Crestian is not free, it is "included in the tuition" it's part of the 17,000+ tuition fee like school lunch - but someone reverted that edit. What about this sentence: "The Crestian is an annual forensics competition held in January known for its size and quality of judges." Where is the source for that? Why is that allowed to stay? (And actually many people dispute the quality of judges). And even about the cross country team - they were allowed to run off school until recently? Where's the source for that? It IS correct, they aren't allowed to run off school but there's no source - it's true information but with no source, like the information I wanted to add above. There are tons of pages on Misplaced Pages with statements that don't have sources and they get marked as "source needed" but are allowed to stay - and these are pages that are probably of much more relevancy to most Misplaced Pages visitors. Why is this page so closely watched? - there are numerous other things that were added (rightfully so) - and in line with the way that the rest of the article has been documented and written. Why all the reverts of new, yet relevant information? I'm a bit confused. Thanks. Nadsat 03:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/ElonkaThank you very much for your support in my RfA. Unfortunately consensus was not reached, and the nomination was not successful. I do however appreciate your comments, am still in support of the Misplaced Pages project, and will continue to contribute without interruption. Thanks again! --Elonka 08:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC) Getting into 3R territory on William Tecumseh ShermanCould give this a look? BusterD 22:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Requesting Admin assistanceOn October 21, you blocked IP 71.76.219.92 (talk · contribs) 31 hours for article blanking. The user has returned from his block and has started to edit the same article again. His edits are troubling as they contain lots of original research. Also he is altering a Wiki-project infobox with information not intended for use there and, for some reason, replacing wiki-links with dabs and re-directs. This evenings edits were mirrored by a logged in user, Dume7 (talk · contribs). The edits seem to flip flop between Dume7 and the Anon IP. I made several attempts at correction with very clear edit summaries but they were ignored. I posted on both users talk pages about the edits and provided links to WP:POL and its policy sublinks. The user then revealed on the IP talk page that(as I suspected) the 2 were 1 in the same and if I wanted to continue my conversation with 71.76.219.92, I was to do it on Dume7's talk page. I re-iterated to the user to read the Misplaced Pages Policy page(the user believes them to be "loose" guidelines). I also directed the user to read WP:SOCK as well. I don't think my advice will go very far. As you are the last Admin to have any sort of history with the editor I was hoping you may have a spare minute or 2 to speak to the user and, perhaps, word things better than I did. I feel they have something positive to contribute. But for now the users edits are a bit troubling. Thanks, Cheers and take care! Anger22 01:31, 26 October 2006 (UTC) You Rock.Just thought I'd let you know. --User24 01:32, 26 October 2006 (UTC) RfA thanks
65.118.187.102You probably need to block 65.118.187.102 again. Tlmclain 19:55, 26 October 2006 (UTC) Wiktionary userHello, CSCWEM. I thought I should alert you to a possible impersonator, as I saw this slightly dodgy userpage on en:wikt : . Can you confirm or deny that you created that account? If it is not you, I can alert the wikt admins to the impersonation. If it is you, then welcome to wiktionary and hurrah for being direct about your sexuality (but it is somewhat in the style of the GNAA, thus arousing suspicion). Beobach972 00:19, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi, us again. If you want, please create an account on Wiktionary and leave us a note on wikt:WT:MV and nudge me, and I'll move you into your own name and relegate the impostor to some other. You could confirm with a reply here, for good measure. I'm ready for a single login, too; meanwhile, you might as well take up your own space so we know who's who. —Dvortygirl 05:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC) (en.wikt bureaucrat)
Rotating IP linkspammerThank you for taking care of the block. From the article names it is clear they were working their way alphabetically through articles. Is there any way to see further back than 500 edits in recent changes, or to find earlier edits in that IP range? I've reverted the ones I could reach, but I'm sure there were others earlier in the alphabet that I can't find. SWAdair 09:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
HelpThere has been a block of Lil crazy thing, I thinks she is a good editor, and I think the block is unjust, so I am wondering if you can unblock if she hasn't been already. Also, there has been problems on the Lita page. I am wondering if you can help fix the WWE Women's Championship link on her page. PLus there are a lot of vandals on the Lita page who keep deleting the Lita Bomb and changing the Litasault to moonsault, despite all the evidence I present. Please help. Thanks. --Fr3nZi3 16:43, 27 October 2006 (UTC) I just created the page Sophia Rossi which has been delete multiple timesI have resolved the issue. :) Valoem 18:04, 27 October 2006 (UTC) Can't sleep, clown will eat meCould you go do at least one little edit on your namesake article? Jehochman (/Contrib) 18:55, 27 October 2006 (UTC) User:Thehutch86...just left a message on my talk page that contains what could be construed as a legal threat (threatening to report me to the "proper internet policia"). His account was recently blocked for vandalism, including one instance to my user page. He also appears to have blanked his Talk page, which included recent blocking discussion. Update: also added this to another user's talk page. For the record, I hadn't been "following" him, Monson, Maine is on my Watchlist along with almost every other Maine city/town. Ripogenus77 19:06, 27 October 2006 (UTC) Pierre RossierHi, Thanks for your recent anti-vandal edits to the two Beato articles. If you're in a 19th century photographer frame of mind, how would you like to check out the Pierre Rossier article, which is a FAC? It's been languishing on the FAC page for several weeks now and has three "support" votes (with none opposed). Thanks for your help! Pinkville 02:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC) Thanks for your dilegenceI think this is the second or third time in a year that you have reverted an edit of mine. I appreciate your diligence on the vandalism patrol :) FYI, I explained my edits here:
Thanks for all of your hard work and efforts. Happy wikiediting. Travb (talk) 04:52, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Fair use image in portalsCan you look at this amendment and evaluate if it's possible? Recently ed g2s and Improv have been raising concerns that changing the fair use will open wikipedia to legal problems and that this issue can't pass. Thanks ahead of time. Ddcc 16:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC) Looking for adviceI apparently messed up my RFA request, which isn't shown on WP:RFA. More on the talk page: Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for adminship/EVula Canderous Ordo 22:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
ConfusedI am busy on recent changes patrol and came across a number of administrator type edits by a new user who was leaving indefinite block messages on user pages. Initially I thought that this was vandalism but saw that the user was in fact indefinitely blocked. My questions are:
Thanks LittleOldMe 13:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC) My talk pageThanks for the clean up! Wildthing61476 21:21, 2 November 2006 (UTC) Gonzo883 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)Tricky bastard pulled the wool over my eyes. He had removed the warnings, which resulted in me giving him two more warnings after test4... For some reason he put them back later and then went to vandalize again. Had I seen it, I would have totally indef'ed him myself. Thanks for catching my mistake. - crz crztalk 00:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Bobabobabo page protectionCould you tell me why you fully protected User talk:Bobabobabo citing "blatant trolling" when it was only one instance prior to my archiving? —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:49, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Sat/Tan SatanismHi, I read a comment from the author saying they would like helping rewriting the above article to make it more acceptable. I've given them my name, but of course I can't know see what exactly I might be getting myself into. Is there any chance of getting a copy on my pages at user:Haseler/Sat-Tan --Mike 08:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC) Hi Can't Sleep. Thanks for the transfer! I've just done half an hour of editing user:Haseler/Sat-Tan and am beginning to realise there isn't much (any) concrete/authorative information to go on! But it's interesting - I'll see whether those involved have anything concrete to add! --Mike 10:51, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
User:BurkemI'd welcome your thoughts on User_talk:Burkem#Undoing_the_damage. --BrownHairedGirl 09:27, 3 November 2006 (UTC) Re. GeorgewilliamherbertThank you for contacting me about my position on Georgewilliamherbert's RfA. I made a more thorough analysis of his contributions and I decided to change my stance to weak support, although I still retain my previous reservations. Nonetheless, I see no major cons from this user really, no indication that he would abuse of the tools, and he definitely seems to know his way around. So I believe it's okay to concede some support despite my not full satisfaction. Best regards.--Húsönd 16:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC) oldafdfull missedI just added {{oldafdfull}} to the talk page for your close of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/John Alan Glennon (2nd nomination). Probably this was just a break in your rhythm, but this is also a friendly reminder to record your closes on the talk pages. GRBerry 16:49, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Damn kids...And how do you know the clown will eat you? HalfShadow 17:10, 3 November 2006 (UTC) Thank you...... for supporting my recent RfA. I have always been a fan of your work, so I am particularly flattered by your support. If you ever need anyone to review an article with fresh eyes, let me know. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 18:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC) Brisbane Grammar SchoolI was just wondering why the Sexual Abuse section (which i still maintain is an irrelevant issue) keeps getting reverted to the unjustified version of Paaerduag's. The version justified and agreed upon should be the one in the article and so far i have seen no justification for it and large amounts of justification against it. Kiran90 05:57, 4 November 2006 (UTC) Can you help meSee Misplaced Pages:Deletion_review/Log/2006_November_4#Azlea_Antistia --Haham hanuka 15:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC) Being an admin must be coolI went and reported that guy before I figured out you blocked him :P. Anyways, ty for the quick block. --Karafias 06:48, 5 November 2006 (UTC) Northern Ireland Schools and IP vandalsHi - I see you've had problems with IP 85.31.137.11 - this is used by most schools in Northern Ireland and, I see is the root of some problems today. Can a complete block be put on this IP? Blowmonkey 15:03, 6 November 2006 (UTC) Stem cell vandalismHi - I've noticed you've been fairly good at reverting the numerous attempts to vandalise stem cell articles, like stem cell controversy and stem cell treatments. I'm not sure how to better protect these pages - putting a block on them seems quite extreme, but there seems to be a lot of vandals targetting them lately. Dr Aaron 00:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC) Glad to see the clown hasn't eaten you yet...Hi, I've seen you around the wiki, and couldn't help but notice that you are a very experienced Wikipedian. I've started a Virtual classroom, for Wikipedians to improve their wiki-skills in general, and it would be really cool if you would stop by and share some of your expertise. Right now we're comparing the user interfaces we use to navigate and work on Misplaced Pages. Interiot has been kind enough to describe the tools and techniques he uses for us, and I was hoping you'd stop by and share how you get so much done. Hope to see you there. Sincerely, The Transhumanist 11:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC) User:B-Dog90-fukWould you mind reviewing my block of the above user to make sure that I handled it correctly? Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 16:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
How do we get a quick semiprotect on Donald Rumsfeld?The article is being buried under several nonsense edits per minute right now in the wake of his announced resignation. -- Jim Douglas (contribs) 18:47, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
tempting to edit user pageA blockMy school's IP has been blocked by you; I know how IP blocks work but wondered if it would be possible to make that an identified school IP so that unregistered people can use Misplaced Pages from it again. Thanks! Oh, and if I can actually remember the IP, I'll tell you. --teh tennisman 00:03, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
ThanksI'm going to do the usual unsuccessful-but-cheery RFA thank yous in a day or two, but I just saw this following up an unrelated discussion in ANI, and I have to say that I appreciate that you went out of your way to do that. Georgewilliamherbert 04:14, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Well DoneI have seen your edits all over the place and seeing as you keep beating me to vandalism reversion; I think you deserve a barnstar:
Funny You Are - Awarded Barnstar of Good Humor
User:WhiteandnerdyActually, it was created by User:Witeandnerdy, so I moved it accordingly. :) User:Zoe|(talk) 22:53, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
NameI realize this is probably not worthy of your page, but as someone suffering from insomnia at this very moment (who has never seen this phrase on a button or anything, unlike some of the folks in your basement who com(pli)mented (you) on the name.... ) I just had to say..... this is the most awesomest username evah. That is all. Feel free to delete this commment if it is too trivial to be allowed to live; my judgment is impaired by insomnia. Vcrs 11:31, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Various botany editsI appreciate your quick and accurate reversions of nonsense/vandalism/spam to the various botany pages you watch. KP Botany 20:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC) Your edit to Category:Nigerian rappersYour recent edit to Category:Nigerian rappers (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Misplaced Pages articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
My talk pageThanks for reverting the edits on my talk page. Last night seems to have been an odd one. Regards, Mr Stephen 09:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC) King Edwards School - vandalismI was just about to revert the vandalism on this article, but you beat me to it. Checking the IP's contributions ( ] ) there seems to have been more from this source. Wikityke 13:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Six fortnights, ehh?A block for "six fortnights", ehh? What other "interesting" units can we use? I think there'd be some real emotional satisfaction in blocking someone for "Several trillion nanoseconds". Kind of like that scene in The Phantom Tollbooth where Sheriff Short Shrift throws Milo and the Watchdog into prison for "several billion years" (IIRC), but doesn't actually care very much whether or not they serve the entire sentence. Atlant 15:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC) aggressive revertingCan you explain why you've reverted this edit and several others adding apparently useful links to articles on Transcendentalism at thoreau.eserver.org? I think you might owe User:Rlenat an apology, as the link is a useful one. -- Rbellin|Talk 15:50, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Assistance neededHowdy! I just blocked User:208.101.4.34 for making a death threat in someone else's name (). It seemed pretty serious, so I made it a permanent block. I'm pretty new to the admin gig, so I wanted to get your take on whether or not that was appropriate. Also, I was wondering what template/message to post on that IP's talk page. There seem to be a lot of them, and a lot of them say similar things. Thanks! --cholmes75 17:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Removal of forum links - lockpickingI ahve noticed that you have removed all forums linked to the lockpicking category and read your reasoning, so am I to understand that all forums related to various subjects will no longer be linked to any wiki or is this specific to this page? UWSDWF 23:28, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
No problems just curious, I hadn't view the page lately and noticed that forum links were gone, saw you had done that and was curious. I shall help spread your crusade by deleting any forum links I find anywhere on Wiki UWSDWF 01:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC) RFA Thanks
Return addressHey, did you know your return address isn't valid? Can you post that to WP:AN with more details? Morwen - Talk 17:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Hot dogs and penisesConsidering that it seems like one of us is reverting some sort of penis-related vandalism on the hot dog page twice a week or so, so you think it would be appropriate to create a specific warning template that politely points out that such vandalism is entirely unoriginal and was last funny in 2004? Probably not, I just needed to blow off steam before I rip someone a new one for thinking that they are so damn clever for comparing the sausage and the appendage. Anyway, cheers and keep up the good work. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 17:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC) Blanking of warningsOn 27 Oct you declined an unblock request from an anon-ip that has been a source of persistent vandalism. A user of the IP has now blanked the talk page and its multiple warnings. I know the placing of warnings for removal of warnings has become controversial (the WR templates have been deleted), so rather than revert the blanking, I thought I'd consult a sysop who'd been involved with this IP about what to do. That's you :) . What to do? --Rrburke 21:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Oops!Looks like I added a db tag right after you deleted Eggy arab, resulting in it being recreated. :( Sorry! Gzkn 09:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Block of 63.23/16Hey... your recent (2 days ago) block of a large chunk of the UUNet dialup account IP space ( ) seems likely to cause excessive collateral damage, and we got a complaint on unblock-en-l already. Is this anon-only or a full block? The template used in the block message doesn't say... Thanks. Georgewilliamherbert 19:15, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Elijah Wood VandalThanks for removing the Gay vandalism in the Elijah Wood early years bio. I was doing that myself while you were in the very act and was quite puzzled why I saw the diff. but could complete the edit. Refreshed and lo and behold. And BTW, I am gay and personally thing LIJ is also, but until we have it on the record, Misplaced Pages is not the place for it edwpat http://www.dancaster.com/ejw What to do about 159.105.80.92?The user has never made any contributions except to talk pages, and virtually all appear to be for the purpose of trolling: the comments, always provocative and sometimes including PAs (see latest at Talk:Ernst Zündel), are rarely about the article, and nearly always about the subject of the article. Signature topic: the Holocaust. Get the picture? --Rrburke 21:56, 17 November 2006 (UTC) RfA thanks
School IP BlockageYou blocked my school district's universal IP (197.237.181.1). Please correct this so my entire school district can edit.-Chwoka Your recent editsThank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Hehe, sorry man, couldn't resist :). GofG || Contribs 20:45, 20 November 2006 (UTC) Sealand imageryHi, I'm puzzled as to why you reverted the edit by user:Iamtheactor. The edit I reversed was an obvious test when the image ] was used. The second edit was an image that the editor uploaded. I am not questioning your decision, but it would be useful if the editor was told what about the image is not allowed. Is it because it is autobiographical? Thanks, LittleOldMe 11:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Article without referencesI need some advice on the Cassie article. The majority of the content is unreferenced and I can't find any sources for it. It's been tagged with the unreferenced template for 5 days now. Obviously I don't really want to remove virtually the entire content from the page but if no one's able or willing to provide citations I don't really have another choice (per WP:CITE). Should I go ahead, "be bold", and move all the uncited content onto the talk page and hope someone can add citations rather than them just re-adding the unsourced material? Any other ideas/opinions? Thanks —B33R 13:03, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Mount EverestPlease see talk page re removal of external links which do NOT breach WP:EL. Viewfinder 00:06, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:Murderball - Mark Zupan.jpgThanks for uploading Image:Murderball - Mark Zupan.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Abu Badali 01:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC) Thank youHi, I hit 10,000 edits the other day and to commemorate this momentous (?) occasion, I wanted to leave a note to the various people I've run into on Misplaced Pages that have made an impact on my time here. Many times I've seen your name as the blocking admin for vandals I've reported at all times of the day (must be the clownophobia). Just wanted to say thank you for all the work you do around here. =) -- Gogo Dodo 05:13, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
ThanksThanks for the vandalism revert on my user page. Much appreciated. James086 06:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC) Perhaps This Is Not An Appropriate Question...But what exactly is a "porch monkey?" I saw it on your "bad words" list and have looked all over and even dictionary.com but can't find what it is. Just asking out of morbid curiosity. Oo -WarthogDemon 07:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC) Block of 62.6.139.11You are currently listed as the user responsible for the block of IP address 62.6.139.11 The very first entry of the discussion page contains this note: "This is an outlet from NHS Net, thus there are around a million people technically behind it, 70 000 or so of them doctors, similar numbers other healthcare professionals, as well as management and all the rest. There is likely to be a prat among them, and also if the exact timing is passed back to the operators of the network, there is likely to be some slight interest in who they are. Blocking the whole thing may be a rather more drastic action than if it was, say, a medium sized company or even ISP. Midgley 16:39, 6 March 2006 (UTC)" A total block is stopping a large number of doctors, professors and other health care professionals from adding their valuable knowledge to the wikipedia. These people may well not have the time to register. As such, the block is liable to be blocking many legitmate edits by experts. --Cooper-42 12:59, 24 November 2006 (UTC) U.S. 366th Infantry Regiment and User:AmerigasanmicheleHi ... I need help from an Administrator regarding this page ... newbie User:Amerigasanmichele does not have a basic grasp of Wiki markup (just see her User Page), and has ignored warnings on her and other Talk pages ... the obit/bio article she created for her father, Dr. Lorenzo R. Nelson, was at first redirected, then became victim of a Speedy Delete within a week ... she also did a huge copy&paste from another website to Meharry Medical College, leading to a rewrite of the article by another user. What I'm asking is if you could keep an eye on this article ... I know America Nelson (Amerigasanmichele) personally--her father and mine were veterans of the 366th--and I do not want to see her blocked from editing right now (she's still learning), but in the future I might have to ask that the article be protected ... her latest edit was to put ~~~~ on the main article page (twice!) because she does not understand that signatures only go on Talk pages (but, at least, now she knows how to leave a signature. :-) Anywho, I've sent her emails about this, and asked her several times to stop making edits until she learns what she's doing, but I would appreciate it if she also heard it from Someone Else (i.e., an Administrator), either on her Talk page or by email ... but not until the next time she mucks up the article, hence my request for you to put it on your watchlist. No need to reply to me right now ... I just wanted to give you a "heads up" that I might be asking for an Intervention regarding this article and user in the near future ... Thnx! —Dennette 05:11, 26 November 2006 (UTC) Speedy delete article....Hello there, could you please take care of this speedy delete article? It does honestly seem like patent nonsense. Thank you.¤~Persian Poet Gal 07:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC) Sorry to bother you again but here's another speedy delete that has been up for awhile. Hope your night (well night for me at least not sure of your time zone :P) has not been too tiresome...¤~Persian Poet Gal 07:15, 27 November 2006 (UTC) Yet another speedy delete article...that has been up for some time.¤~Persian Poet Gal 08:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC) Tamaskan dogCould you zap this? It's been on AfD 6 days, the consensus is delete by a wide margin (and with good reason) and the author is back sticking linkspam on the article and claiming that the article is "under consideration" when in fact it's a sure delete. Thanks. Tubezone 08:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Edit warring and copyvioCan you take a look at the Zakir Naik page ? There seems to to an edit-war on. Also the Biography section seems to be copied from . I had placed a copyright violation notice a few hours back (see ), but it was removed and the problematic text reinserted. Abecedare 09:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC) BlockCould you please block User:125.212.74.174 for repeated vandalism of List of Marvel Comics films? Thank you. --Jamdav86 17:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC) Shannon LarrattI had initiated the AfD for the entry on Shannon Larratt - I just noticed that while the main page was deleted, there is still an active discussion page. Is this normal? Thanks. -- Metlin 19:20, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Jack SpicerI'm sure you're busy enough, but if you have a second, I have put a {{db-move}} tag on Jack Spicer. The original Jack Spicer page, to which a lot of stuff links, was moved to Jack Spicer (poet) by Iodyne (talk • contribs), who then put a cut and paste copy of Jack Spicer (Xiaolin Showdown) at Jack Spicer. The links are screwed up, and we have two articles on the anime character. I appreciate that this isn't really db-move territory, but drive-by cut and paste moves are not very nice. Could you move Jack Spicer (poet) back to Jack Spicer please ? If Iodyne wants to move it, (s)he should really fix the links first. Thanks in advance, Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:38, 28 November 2006 (UTC) The real name of Cap'n Crunch"This is free-encyclopedia. You recently edited the page on Cap'n Crunch. You took out my comment about how his full name was Horatio Magellan Crunch, and put something at the top about how how the page does not site its sources or something. Well, I found the fact in the reliable book by Jeopardy! champion Ken Jennings, Braniac. I could not find the same fact anywhere else on the Internet (aside from Misplaced Pages, where I put it), so I couldn't cite the source. I just wanted to run it by you. Unless you object, I would love to re-enter that fact, because it is my personal favorite of all of my contributions.Free-encyclopedia 02:26, 28 November 2006 (UTC)" (Moved by -WarthogDemon 02:28, 28 November 2006 (UTC))
Can you assist me?This article (]) is just pure nonsense, and I am sick and tired of wrangling with these two editors, Airace and Mr.wolverine and their coninuing acts of vandalism. Would you kindly knock each of them upside the head? Thanks. ---Charles 21:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Can't stop, thanks will eat meSeriously - I wasn't going to send thank-you cards, but the emotional impact of hitting WP:100 (and doing so unanimously!) changed my mind. So I appreciate your confidence in me at RFA, and hope you'll let me know if I can do anything for you in the future. Cheers! -- nae'blis 23:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC) Grenslade cresYou deleted Grenslade cres as "Speedy G4" . However, its log shows no evidence of an AfD deletion, and its AfD was never closed. Were you repeating the speedy-deletion? (In this case, it would be an A7 redeletion, using the same criterion as last time, rather than a G4, which "does not apply if the only prior deletions were speedy or proposed deletions, although in this case, the previous speedy criterion, or other speedy deletion criteria, may apply".) I'm asking because I'm no longer sure what to put in the AfD closing reason. --ais523 10:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
New talk from AlecBah, you keep beating me to vandalism reverts by just seconds! Nice work though :) Alec 07:34, 29 November 2006 (UTC) Joe Satriani revertSo let me see if I understand this correctly. This piece already states : - "Satriani falls into the category of guitar virtuosos who primarily achieve speed through hammer-ons and pull-offs" A fact that no guitarist would argue with, and yet is uncited, and not verified in any way. If I then add a section on his technique, suggestion that he uses Legato phrasing as a recurring theme, it gets removed within seconds. Who says he is a virtuso, for example? Where is that cited? I'm not trying to have a go at you here - don't get me wrong! But what exactly constitutes a citation for the fact that Joe Satriani is well known for using Legato? What about this? ]? I guess that wouldn't be good enough, because it is just the 'instructors' opinion. In which case, why have such phrases as "Satriani falls into the category of guitar virtuosos who primarily achieve speed through hammer-ons and pull-offs", or words like 'virtuoso', because they are not verified, and are subject to the writers opinion?Mikejstevenson 12:53, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
RfA thanksThank you for voting in my RfA, I passed. I appreciate your input. Please keep an eye on me(if you want) to see if a screw up. HighInBC 16:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Battle of ChalonsWhy did you revert my comment about your erroneous revert? The revert was erroneous, after all. Bart133 19:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC) I think it is. See Template:Infobox Military Conflict. Bart133 15:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Re: 744 hoursLOL!! Wouldn't 1 month have been easier? :D RadioKirk (u|t|c) 19:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC) Block noticesHi CSCWEM, I've run across a few IPs that you've blocked where you haven't left a block notice. The most recent example is User talk:68.9.225.207 which you blocked on Nov. 17. Could I gently remind you to leave a {{test5}} on the talk pages of users you've blocked? it makes clear to the user what has happened and helps other admins like myself when we run across those users in the future. Many thanks, Gwernol 22:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC) Bobabobabo againShe's on now and pissing me off by having registered my Wiki-email (Ryulong67atgmail.com (talk · contribs)). I could use a bit of help right now...—Řÿūłóñģ (竜龍) 22:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Kevin FederlineGreetings Clown, I recall that you were one of the admins who helped maintain the Kevin Federline article. I've spent appreciable time cleaning that article up, as many of the entries were slurs. If you check my "talk" page, you'll even see a couple of folks disenchanted with my work. One of them was angry that I wouldn't accept his myspace page as a source, when that person mentioned that Federline tickets were being given away for free in a local periodical. Another wikipedian was angry that I kept removing his "Britney Spears/Kevin Federline Sex Tape" contribution, as it was an unsubstantiated slur that was initiated by a notoriously unreliable British tabloid. There is a new problem. Some individual seems to have taken issue with the music critiques. As you are probably aware, Federline's album has received some of the worst reviews in the history of the music business. If anything, Federline is notable now for the overall commercial failure of the album and concert tour, as well as for the scathing reviews. The reviews were so bad, in all likelihood his status as a celebrity and recording artist will endure (think Ed Wood). Though it isn't mentioned within the Federline article, one veteran industry observer mentioned that the CD had the poorest reviews in the history of the business. Another industry publication quantifies the music industry critical reviews, and then averages them for an overall grade. The Federline CD received the lowest score within the 11 year or so history of such ratings. That also isn't within the article. This individual (Michaelh2001) has taken it upon himself to be a censure. He has erased most of the bad reviews, leaving the only positive review (the Ron Harris review, which I contributed earlier). Further, he accuses me of only editing out positive remarks and leaving in the negative. I'm not sure if he's a fan, or someone who is confusing balance and objectivity with being "nice". One thing is certain: He's made false accusations on my character, and has threatened to start a revert war. I've been working hard on this article, and though parts of it are not flattering to Federline, it presents the most comprehensive and authoritative views on Federline. Could you please review his actions? I'd appreciate your impartial view, in that you've also helped monitor this article.EdwardG 18:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Your usernameYour username is really odd... Where it come from? --Uusitunnus 21:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
(:-D) your username makes me all warm and squishy inside...either that or i should start wearing depends...Bouncehoper 02:41, 2 December 2006 (UTC) Please helpAre you an admin? Someone has vandalised my page . Will you tell him/her to stop please? WikieZach| talk 22:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Thanks for catching those changes on the Jack Spicer pageThanks for catching those changes to the Jack Spicer article. That person who made the change would be very surprised to find out that Jack Spicer is very well known and famous today especially in the United States, England, and France. But the point you made is right on: this article should not have been switched to "Jack Spicer (poet)" without first being first discussed in the Misplaced Pages community. Again, thanks for your repairs. Christian Roess 01:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC) ArbCom questionsHi. I'm Ral315, editor of the Misplaced Pages Signpost. We're doing a series on ArbCom candidates, and your response is requested.
Please respond on my talk page. We've already gone to press for this week, but your responses would be added immediately, and you and other late-entering users would be noted in next week's issue as well. Ral315 (talk) 05:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC) Tonbridge schoolIm sorry, but it seems that you have no idea how busy my network admin is. Far too busy to sort out things like this. Portfolio for ArbComOn Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Summary table, I added a column "Examples" with links that exhibit a candidate's arbitration skills. My motivation is that as a voter, I don't want to just rely on a candidate's words, but also see their actions. Moreover, I believe a portfolio of "model cases" to remember in difficult situations can be useful for each candidate, as well. So far I have entered examples for the candidates who registered first (from their questions page), and I'm not sure if and when I will get to yours, so you may want to enter an example or two yourself. — Sebastian (talk) 05:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC) (I may not be watching this page anymore. If you would like to continue the conversation, please do so here and let me know.) ArbcomGood luck. --Dweller 10:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
User talk protectionPer a request at , I have unprotected your talk page (move-protected still enabled). It seems like the AOL thing has passed, so I thought it was appropriate since IP's and new users frequently ask admins questions related to articles and such. Nishkid64 22:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC) And now for the real reason...Would you mind deleting the revision of my talk page that you reverted? It was loaded with personal infos and while I may not like the uzers mentioned, I don't think that level of "4th wall breaking" is justified by anything I've seen them do. 68.39.174.238 02:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 4th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:28, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Can you fix these?I notice that you've previously fixed some stuff on the Epicanthal fold article, thus I direct my request to you, as I'm new here & don't know how to do them myself. 1) The pic of the young woman has some vandalism to the copyright notice. 2) The other pic says it was cropped from a larger pic. The link to that larger pic is broken. Thanks! Mpwrmnt 06:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Lil' Bush pageAlthough it's unclear why you protected the page (please explain in the future), the show is making news and will likely need a full entry soon. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.217.121.149 (talk) 07:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC).
Vandalism212.219.142.4 is on a vandalism streak today. House of Scandal 15:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC) Question/requestOkay, I have a few something to ask.
It would be more convenient for me not to constantly log in from school because the school itself logs our activites and I don't want anyone corrupt in that system either getting a hold of it. It's odd, but yeah... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SBKT (talk • contribs) 18:59, 5 December 2006 (UTC). User Ric168Can't sleep, clown will eat me, thanks for welcoming me in Misplaced Pages. Are you a wikipedia Admin? Ric168 12:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC) Paul MitchellThanks for the Paul Mitchell info. • Shadowhillway 00:08, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Excessive movesIf you are an admin, can you pleaase block User talk:Yaksha ? it has come to my attention that that user has made excessive moving of pages without consensus, WP:ANI shows a member of the MedCom agreeing with this request, thank you, WikieZach| talk 02:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Who to edit?Can't sleep, clown will eat me, I am just curious. Im sure Wikpedia has a million of editors, how do admin picks which to edit? Ric168 10:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC) |