This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dream Focus (talk | contribs) at 18:46, 22 November 2019 (→Michael Jackson's Dangerous Liaisons). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:46, 22 November 2019 by Dream Focus (talk | contribs) (→Michael Jackson's Dangerous Liaisons)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Michael Jackson's Dangerous Liaisons
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Michael Jackson's Dangerous Liaisons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. This book does not meet the basic requirements of Misplaced Pages:Notability (books). Same information about this book available on its author's page Tom O'Carroll#Michael Jackson's Dangerous Liaisons. There are also no reliable sources, per Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources, that backs the content of this book. Thus delete . TruthGuardians (talk) 02:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 04:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to author page. Apparently no legitimate publications dared to review this book given its revolting author. —Мандичка 😜 04:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. The book has been reviewed in the academic journals Archives of Sexual Behavior and Sexualities, which are reliable sources and satisfy WP:NBOOK. MarkZusab (talk) 04:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- One source still doesn't make it notable. An academic journal doesn't neccesarily speak for the book's legitimacy. WP:NBOOK clearly speaks to this. There shouldn't be a separate, stand-alone article entirely dedicated to this book. TruthGuardians (talk) 06:52, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect. There is no reason to have an article about this. Odd they didn't sue them for slander/libel to stop it from being published. Dream Focus 18:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)