This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 04:14, 17 February 2020 (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:InShaneee/Archive/Nov/2018, User talk:InShaneee/Archive/May/2019) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:14, 17 February 2020 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:InShaneee/Archive/Nov/2018, User talk:InShaneee/Archive/May/2019) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Click here to start a new talk section.
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC) Template:Z83
Orphaned non-free image File:Shaneposter.png
Thanks for uploading File:Shaneposter.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of They Hunger for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article They Hunger is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/They Hunger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:30, 16 February 2020 (UTC)