Misplaced Pages

User talk:Doc glasgow

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Doc glasgow (talk | contribs) at 20:35, 28 December 2006 (FYI: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:35, 28 December 2006 by Doc glasgow (talk | contribs) (FYI: reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:Doc glasgow/tidy


User name created to Slur an individual

You visit the user page for Bruce cairney before and removed 'unhelpful comments' how about deleting the user completely it is obvoiusly only created to sling mud and BS —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.152.12.41 (talk) 09:05, 25 December 2006 (UTC).

Huh?

You posted the following on my talk page but it doesn't make any sense. I have no idea of which archive you are talking about or why/what was done. Could you educate me? Balloonman 14:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Churches

I think the best idea would be to merge it into WP:LOCAL, and redirect it there. LOCAL is mostly stable and focuses on merging rather than deletion. I don't think it's all that helpful to have WP:SUPERMARKET, WP:RESTAURANT, WP:CHURCH and WP:GAS_STATION and other subsections. Obviously is a church is large enough to be known outside its own city, people can't say "delete per WP:LOCAL". HTH! >Radiant< 09:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


FYI

Despite of your "IRC" opinion that I am "not worth it", It is only fair of me to give you notification of this edit of mine here , and chance to respond to it. I mention it only because the thread is now so long things are easily missed, and I never talk behind people's backs - a concept I don't expect you to understand. Giano 20:30, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

I'm not going to bother responding to that. When I say you are "not worth it", I meant simply that there is no point in getting upset at, surprised by, or trying to cure, your incivility and assumptions of bad faith. But I guess you'll want to assume I meant something altogether more sinister. I now intend to follow my own advice and comment no futher.--Doc 20:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)