This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ashley Pomeroy (talk | contribs) at 10:58, 14 February 2005 (Imaginary and unknown). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:58, 14 February 2005 by Ashley Pomeroy (talk | contribs) (Imaginary and unknown)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)"The image of Egbert is an imaginary portrait drawn by an unknown artist" - that's pretty poor, and whoever wrote the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica was clearly out of his depth. Is there any case for retaining the image, given that (a) we don't know whose likeness it presents and (b) we don't know who carved it? Granted, the chances of an alternative image arising are very small. -Ashley Pomeroy 10:58, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)