This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Editor2020 (talk | contribs) at 00:30, 15 October 2021 (sort by importance). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:30, 15 October 2021 by Editor2020 (talk | contribs) (sort by importance)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Today’s Jews of all variety are likely a mix of all 12 tribes in different proportions. Ashkenazi, Sephardic, Mizrahi etc. doesn’t designate ancient tribe, only where those populations were historically living after the diaspora. The majority are likely descended from Judah, Benjamin and Levi as they made up the majority of the Southern Kingdom. But not everyone from the “Lost Tribes” were really lost as many settled in Judah after the Assyrians fell. They were likely remixed into the larger Jewish population. Today, no tribal links really remain. Although some claim to know they are Levite’s, but that is suspect and likely more tradition.
Yea, that response is absurd. Ashkenazi Jews are not from any specific tribe. They are a subset of ethnic Jews who likely entered Europe through Rome. Over the course of centuries they migrated through what is now France, what was then Gaul, and settling in different locations along the way. They spent a great deal of time in the Rhine Valley. That area of today’s France and Germany was eventually called “Ashkenaz” as there was thought to be some connection between Gomer and the Germanic people groups who lived there. After living in this area and the low lands, for centuries, these Jews were eventually kicked out by ruling Royalty. They dispersed in different directions, with the majority moving East, eventually settling in what is today Poland and Lithuania, where they were accepted for a long period. As they grew in population they began settling all over Central and Eastern Europe, wherever they were allowed to at relative time periods. Some went to Britain, others Iberia, Italy and Ottoman territories. But most settled in Central and Eastern Europe where they lived until the holocaust in WW2. Now they make up most of the worlds Jews, although since emigrating to the US, Israel, England, Australia and other countries, post WW2, they are again intermixing with Jews from across the world. Today there is far less separation between Jewish communities as Ashkenazi, Sephardic, Mizrahi and other Jewish populations are recombining to form a more modern, homogenous Jewish people. Soon, such differentiation will be mostly obsolete as an ethnic identifier. Even today, the worlds Jews can again be considered one people.
No Jews today really know what tribe their ancestors originated from. The Kohens/Levites are thought to be of the tribe of Levi, but that is more tradition than fact. In all likelihood, today’s Jews are all a mixture of ALL the ancient tribes, even the supposed “Lost Tribes”. After the fall of Israel to the Assyrians, it is completely likely many from the “Lost Tribes”, made their way back to the Kingdom of Judah and remixed with those living in Judah. Judah was named for the tribe of Judah, of which King David is thought to be descended. But Jews today are called “Jews” because they came from the Land of Judah or Judea, not because they are all from the tribe of Judah. There is no longer any real Jewish tribal destination. All though some isolated populations, such as in India, China, Ethiopia and other generally non Jewish locations, claim to know what tribe they descend from because they have been isolated from the majority of Jewish populations for so long. This is possible, but still just a theory of tradition more than fact.
While most Jews are thought to be mostly from the tribes of Judah, Benjamin and Levi, because they supposedly made up the majority of the population in the Southern Kingdom, it is wholly likely different percentages of Ancient Israelites from all 12 tribes lived in the Southern Kingdom and thus their descendants are likely all mixed up in the larger Jewish population of today.
JarbeeChesschi July 8, 2020
Correction to the above
Genesis 10:1-3
Descendants of Noah
1 Now these are the records of the generations of Shem, Ham, and Japheth, the sons of Noah; and sons were born to them after the flood.
2 The sons of Japheth were Gomer and Magog and Madai and Javan and Tubal and Meshech and Tiras.
3 The sons of Gomer were Ashkenaz and Riphath and Togarmah.
1 Chronicles 1:1-6
Historical Records From Adam to Abraham
To Noah’s Sons
1 Adam, Seth, Enosh,
2 Kenan, Mahalalel, Jared,
3 Enoch, Methuselah, Lamech, Noah.
4 The sons of Noah: Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
The Japhethites
5 The sons of Japheth: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshek, and Tiras.
6 The sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz, Riphath, and Togarmah.
The Semites
24 Shem, Arphaxad, Shelah,
25 Eber, Peleg, Reu,
26 Serug, Nahor, Terah
27 and Abram (that is, Abraham).
According to the religious narrative of the Hebrew Bible, the Israelites' origin is traced back to the biblical patriarchs and matriarchs Abraham, the first Hebrew and a descendant of Shem, and his wife Sarah, through their son Isaac and his wife Rebecca, and their son Jacob (who was later called Israel, whence they derive their name) with his wives Leah and Rachel and the handmaids Zilpah and Bilhah. Ashkenazi "Jews" may be Jewish by their adopted religion, at best, but they are NOT Jewish by bloodline because they are not descendants of Abraham through Isaac and Jacob. Before establishing communities along the Rhine River in Western Germany and in Northern France, the Ashkenazim were somewhat nomadic Slavic peoples in the northern Caucasus Mountain regions (e.g., Poland, Lithuania, Russia, Georgia). Georgians call themselves Kartvelebi (ქართველები), their land Sakartvelo (საქართველო), and their language Kartuli (ქართული). According to The Georgian Chronicles, the ancestor of the Kartvelian people was Kartlos, the son of Ashkenaz and great-grandson of the Biblical Japheth. The entire region was settled by Japhethites. Ashkenaz was the first son of Gomer and a Japhetic patriarch in the Table of Nations. In rabbinic literature, the kingdom of Ashkenaz was first associated with the Scythian region, then later with the Slavic territories, and, from the 11th century onwards, with Germany and northern Europe. This is why they cannot directly trace their lineage to any of the tribes of Israel except maybe through marriage. This is not an anti-Semitic statement; firstly, because they are Japhethites, not Semites; and secondly, because I hold no ill will towards them whatsoever. There is way too much misinformation and too many opinions on this page, and the record needed to be clarified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.196.114.63 (talk) 13:00, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Messiah will/was
Regarding the comment "The Messiah *will* come out of the tribe of Judah". It should be "The Messiah *came out of* the tribe of Judah." His name is Jesus Christ/Yeshua!
— Unsigned comment by 24.251.1.200; 5 May 2006
- Asserting religious beliefs is not appropriate for a general-purpose encyclopedia. I've emended the sentence to reflect that The Messiah is a figure of Judeo-Christianity.
- — Unsigned comment by 69.237.181.238; 13 May 2006
- The phrase Judeo-Christianity asserts it's own belief. The blanket term is inherently contradictory and is cleverly biased toward Jewish thought and worldview. Can Judaism and Christianity be any more opposite at their core? You may as well invent the term Judeo-Islamic, but that wouldn't appeal to the current state of affairs. Propaganda, whether intentional or not, is not appropriate for a general-purpose encyclopedia either.
- — Unsigned comment by 69.144.84.133; 29 August 2006
Notable Members???
Why are the "slaves brought to the U.S." notable members of the Tribe of Judah. This is a misleading unsourced extreme minority viewpoint thrown in probably to push some point of view. If anything, the "slaves brought to the U.S." should be listed under "modern descendants" not "notable members" (which should list individuals). If it were up to me, I think "slaves brought to the U.S." should be removed entirely from this article.
Also, with all due respect to Yechezkel Landau, whom I'm sure is well known in some circles, he is much less "notable" than Biblical figures such as Judah, Caleb, Boaz, Jesse, Absalom, Solomon, Hezekiah, Josiah, and Isaiah, none of whom apparently merited mention of this list of "notable members". So I added the above mentioned individuals. Personally I think its a bit silly to have a list of "notable members" of the main tribe of the Old Testimate. While I understand that not everyone who reads wikipedia has read the Bible, from reading the article people should get the idea that pretty much a lot of important characters from the Old Testimate are going to be notable members of the Tribe of Judah. Michael.passman 08:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
I want to know how and when "judeans" were black people. While I don't doubt that there were and are sephardic jews in spain and portugal, I'm still a little confused as to how they are also black. That's like the ludicrous claim that just because mary, joseph and jesus fled to egypt to escape the
Roman death sentence on children, they are black.Saucybetty 07:07, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
What's "ludicrous" is your attempt to make "jesus" a historical figure. There were no "j"s in hebrew or greek so there's no way someone named jesus did anything. Secondly human sacrifice is an abomination to the Hebrew Diety to whom the Torah and tanaach refer to. Thirdly, The slaves brought to America are most certainly from this judaic stock. There are records to prove it. Even you, who insist on deleting this lost information should see it to be strange that these slaves were told they didn't have a history or a home land at all.This same stock was made slaves in Egypt and Babylon. It is the same lineage.Look at deuteronomy 28 and see who it describes. Look at it with an open heart, not sneering or negative, just look at who it describes. Slavery was justified to the American public by saying they would make the slaves christians.The Inquisition said the same thing. Those slaves were deported from portuguese prisons, sent to Sao Thome and from there made slaves in America. Even the Haplotype of the American Negro shows an middle Eastern origin.Please stop deleting this info, even if you do not agree with it, that does not make it untrue.
I don't think Jesus was what he was called in Hebrew or Aramaic, it would have been Yeshua. Jesus is the anglicised version of the original name.In Greek it is pronounced as Yesu.
Jesus was called most probably addressed as Yeshua in those times.
--Davidmichell 12:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Yes, Jesus was called Yeshua. Just because his name is anglicized doesn't mean he didn't exist. The person we call Joshua was called Yoshua at that time. We anglicize his name, but that doesn't mean he isn't a historical figure. Sir Akroy 14:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Jesus Christ
Being a descendant of David, wasn't Jesus of the tribe of Judah?
I think he should be in that list. He certainly was a notable person then, and people still discuss him even now.
--Davidmichell 12:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
The claim that he was descendant of David implies then that there was no immaculate conception. Tribal lineage follows through the father. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.248.139.140 (talk) 23:37, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
African slaves
This looks like original research. Please bring reliable verifiable sources. ←Humus sapiens 12:01, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
No this isn't original research"The African Origin of Modern Judaism", by Jose V. Malcioln, " Judea Trembles Under Rome", "The Valley of Dry Bones" and "From Babylon To Timbuktu", written by Rudolph Windsor. "This Black Jesus", by Ettiese Abisika, The Works of Josephus speak of Judeans being "black", President of Egypt Gamal Nasser(who isn't black) said,"There will never be peace in Israel because the jews left Black, but returned white." There are other sources if you are truly interested, but I hope this will suffice.(I know it won't, there has been an agenda of hiding the true origin of the people that were made slaves in America since the shameful deed began. Also Deuteronomy 28 states what would happen if the "people of the book" did not remember their covenant.63.215.29.23 18:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Proof please. See WP:CITE. A quote if possible would be nice. Nasser is not an authority on Jewish history. ←Humus sapiens 21:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Modern Members
It is certainly true and it was certainly prophesied. What is also true is Genesis 10 clearly states Ashkenaz descended from Japheth and not from Shem. The word Ashkenazi Jew is an oxymoron. They descended from the converted Khazars. See The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler.
And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety (promise) that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them; and they shall afflict them 400 years; And also that nation, whom they shall serve, will I judge: and afterward shall they come out with great substance. -Genesis 15: 13-14
Now the sojourning of the children of Israel, who dwelt in Egypt, was four hundred and thirty years. Exodus 12:40
The children of Israel were not afflicted in Egypt for 400 years according to the geneology of Levi. (see Exodus 6:13-26). It was 430 years from the time Abraham first began his sojourn in Canaan until the exodus. But the promise was that Abraham's seed would be afflicted 400 years.
For I know that after my death ye will utterly corrupt yourselves, and turn aside from the way which I commanded you; and 'evil will befall you in the latter days; because you will do evil in the sight of the LORD, to provoke him to anger through the works of your hands. -Deuteronomy 31:29
Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ (a descendant of Judah). And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after (the promise to Abraham), cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect. For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise. Galatians 3:16-18
No other people in the history of the world have been strangers in a land that is not theirs and afflicted for 400 years except the "Negro" in America. They are certainly descendants of the tribe of Judah and the true heirs of the promise.
And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people (a stranger in a land not theirs), that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities (that nation whom they shall serve will I judge). -Revelation 18: 4-5
It is not BS, it is a promise - Selah
The Ashkenazi are indeed descended from ancient Hebrews
But the great majority are not of the tribe of Judah. When the Romans burned the second temple, it was those who could afford the trip out of Israel who made it, the poor stayed behind. They didn't have a choice. Because only people from the tribe of Levi could be priests, naturally they were the richest in ancient Israel. That whole story of the diaspora, simply doesn't make any sense; Rome was going to spend the ancient equivalent of billions of dollars to displace an entire group of people? The Babylonian captivity makes sense; because it's easier to march "local" people to your own country than it is to ship them. Rome needed those ships to fight pirates, not to mention trade. To spend all those resources simply to remove Jews, to spend all those seafaring vessels, simply doesn't make any logical sense. Like the Greeks, although brutal, the Romans were a practical bunch.
The majority of Ashkenazi can't be descended from the tribe of Judah, the reason being, the presence of the Coahim gene. In a significant percentage of Jewish males across the world, it is very common. It is also common in many "nonjewish" groups such as Italians and southern Spaniards. It is true that the tribe of Judah was the most numerous, but, most were killed fighting the Romans, and whatever remained of them was finished off by the Muslims in later centuries. Besides, other genetic evidence points to the fact that the overpowering majority of Ashkenazi Jews descend only from four women; please check any genetic literature on the Jews. I don't need to source it, you can find it practically anywhere that deals with the subject. The high incidence of the Coahim gene in Italy, which only occurs in the tribe of Levi, the fact that the Levites were the richest Jews in Roman times (and arguably the most corrupt), and that Rome would not spend billions in ships and shipping to remove the majority of the Jews from that land, leads me to question the notion that the majority of Jews come from the tribe of Judah. The majority being of course, the Ashkenazi. At least, for the time being.
At the risk of sounding unscientific, correct me if I'm wrong but, did not Jacob curse Levi by saying he would scatter his descendants? The descendants of Judah stayed in the middle east, the vast majority in Iraq. Iraq is not that far away from Israel. It was the Ashkenazi who were scattered all across the globe, confirming Jacob's curse. If true, then, boy, those curses by Jewish patriarchs are something to fear, all things considered. Please revise that assumption; I checked sources 9 through 12 and none of them say the majority of Jews descend from the tribe of Judah. What the sources said, at least the clearly written ones, that the entire Jewish people were NAMED after the tribe of Judah, but, the sources didn't say they DESCEND from them. Again; please take into consideration the fact that the majority of Ashkenazi descend from only four women, and the Sephardic populations in Spain, which were relatively small compared to those of other parts of Europe put together (like for example Russia). Take into consideration the high incidence of the Coahim gene, which occurs only among the descendants of Aaron, the descendants of Aaron being, what else? Levites. Coincidence? I don't think so; the fact of the matter is, the wealthy Levites turned tail and ran, while the tribe of Judah stayed and fought, getting slaughtered by the Roman army in the process. Again; the high incidence of the Coahim gene in Italy and Spain points to the fact that the majority of today's Ashkenazi Jews are Levites, not Judeans.
The Babylonians took the entire royal family of David hostage and, pardon my slang here but it was a big ass family. With polygamy being, not at all uncommon for much of the Semitic world's history, it is quite possible that a very large bulk of Iraqi Jews descend from David himself. Again; that family of his was a big ass family, and the man is very well known for being a womanizer. Not all of them, but arguably a significant portion.
I typed too much; all I ask is that you please revise that and look at your sources again.
thanks. stardingo747 —Preceding comment was added at 13:04, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Correction to the above
Genesis 10:1-3
Descendants of Noah
1 Now these are the records of the generations of Shem, Ham, and Japheth, the sons of Noah; and sons were born to them after the flood.
2 The sons of Japheth were Gomer and Magog and Madai and Javan and Tubal and Meshech and Tiras.
3 The sons of Gomer were Ashkenaz and Riphath and Togarmah.
1 Chronicles 1:1-6, 24-27
Historical Records From Adam to Abraham
To Noah’s Sons
1 Adam, Seth, Enosh,
2 Kenan, Mahalalel, Jared,
3 Enoch, Methuselah, Lamech, Noah.
4 The sons of Noah: Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
The Japhethites
5 The sons of Japheth: Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshek, and Tiras.
6 The sons of Gomer: Ashkenaz, Riphath, and Togarmah.
The Semites
24 Shem, Arphaxad, Shelah,
25 Eber, Peleg, Reu,
26 Serug, Nahor, Terah
27 and Abram (that is, Abraham).
According to the religious narrative of the Hebrew Bible, the Israelites' origin is traced back to the biblical patriarchs and matriarchs Abraham, the first Hebrew and a descendant of Shem, and his wife Sarah, through their son Isaac and his wife Rebecca, and their son Jacob (who was later called Israel, whence they derive their name) with his wives Leah and Rachel and the handmaids Zilpah and Bilhah. Ashkenazi "Jews" may be Jewish by their adopted religion, at best, but they are NOT Jewish by bloodline because they are not descendants of Abraham through Isaac and Jacob. Before establishing communities along the Rhine River in Western Germany and in Northern France, the Ashkenazim were somewhat nomadic Slavic peoples in the northern Caucasus Mountain regions (e.g., Poland, Lithuania, Russia, Georgia). Georgians call themselves Kartvelebi (ქართველები), their land Sakartvelo (საქართველო), and their language Kartuli (ქართული). According to The Georgian Chronicles, the ancestor of the Kartvelian people was Kartlos, the son of Ashkenaz and great-grandson of the Biblical Japheth. The entire region was settled by Japhethites. Ashkenaz was the first son of Gomer and a Japhetic patriarch in the Table of Nations. In rabbinic literature, the kingdom of Ashkenaz was first associated with the Scythian region, then later with the Slavic territories, and, from the 11th century onwards, with Germany and northern Europe. This is why they cannot directly trace their lineage to any of the tribes of Israel except maybe through marriage. This is not an anti-Semitic statement; firstly, because they are Japhethites, not Semites; and secondly, because I hold no ill will towards them whatsoever. There is way too much misinformation and too many opinions on this page, and the record needed to be clarified.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.196.114.63 (talk) 11:51, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
This answer from stardingo747 is absurd. Today’s Jews are not from any specific tribe. They are a mix of descendants from all 12 Tribes. Mostly Judah, Benjamin, and Levi, but also the other 9. When Assyria conquered the Northern Kingdom of Israel, many fled south and stayed in the Southern Kingdom of Judah. They eventually mixed into the greater population of Judah. Further, when Assyria fell, it is likely many former Israelites from the enslaved Northern tribes likely returned to live in Judah. Today’s Jews of every kind are not actually from any specific tribe. They are a mix of all tribes, but probably mostly Judah, Benjamin, and Levi, with the other 9 mixed in at lesser percentages. Ashkenazi, Sephardic, and Mizrahi don’t designate tribe, but location from where these populations lived after the diaspora during the Roman era. They are called Jews today because they came from the Kingdom or the nation of Judah. Not because they were all from the tribe of Judah. Some believe they know they are from the tribe of Levi, but that is suspect. Even Levite’s would be of mixed tribal parentage at this point. Pretty much all Jewish males today have some percentage of the genetic Kohen marker. Some more than others, but it doesn’t tell us their actual tribal lineage
Some populations of Jews that were isolated for longer from the larger Jewish population claim to know what tribe they are from. Jews isolated in China, India, Burma, Ethiopia, Uzbekistan, and some other locations claim lineage from specific tribes. There is no real way of knowing though. Such claims are likely more traditional than fact. Although these populations were isolated from the larger Ashkenazi, Sephardic, and Mizrahi populations for a very long time, so it’s not impossible. Just not provable.
And anyone who suggests no one from the “Lost Tribes” remained, is coming from a religious belief but not a historical one. It is almost certain that when Israel fell, all those remaining from the Lost Tribes immigrated to Judah and mixed into the greater population of Judah. Again, where today’s Jews get their name, not from the tribe of Judah. JarbeeChesschi (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
In summation, “stardingo747”’s answer is completely ridiculous and ignorant. Why that answer comes up on search is beyond me. Nothing he said about modern populations was correct. Further, the Romans didn’t pay to send Jews off. They told them to get out of there. Most people from the Kingdom of Judah, which at that point was mixed of all 12 tribes, left what became Palestine, until a few centuries later. They fled to various different regions all across the Old World. Today’s Jews are not called Jews because they all descend from the tribe of Judah. They are called Jews because they came from the Kingdom of Judah, which again was made up of different proportions from ALL 12 tribes, but mostly Judah, Benjamin, and Levi. But anyone suggesting no one from the “Lost Tribes” survived and escaped and fled to Judah from Israel is full of it. They are stating a religious faith belief, not a historically accurate claim. ALL ethnic Jews today are different, unknown mixes from all 12 tribes. JarbeeChesschi (talk) 15:28, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
Maternal Lineage
In Judaism maternal lineage is more important regarding ethnicity, but the religion says the Messiah is supposed to be a male descendant of David, descended from David himself. If every Jew had strictly only maternal descent, the Messiah would never even be born. Frankly I don't see how Messiah prophecy, and lineage issues make any sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.63.78.78 (talk) 14:41, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Be careful; in pointing that out, you are violating a sacred cow of ashkenazi Jewry. Remember that currently the ruling elite of Israel are ashkenazi Jews; if the Messiah does appear I highly doubt they will welcome him with open arms. Provided you believe in that stuff; I'm not 100%, given the enormity of the universe. So, after the Messiah is done redeeming the world will he redeem planet Vulcan too? I'm just saying; its a big universe. I have never been comfortable with the idea of geocentrism; also, if alien civilizations do exist do THEY believe in God and do THEY believe in the Jewish Messiah? Tough questions, that most religions don't address. Of course, the sheer size of the universe is no reason to be an atheist; if anything its sheer enormity, means that by physical law, it could not have had a natural origin. The Big Bang theory more or less makes logical sense, if it is viewed as an antimater explosion. Anti matter, does not obey the laws of time, an "explosion" of a super concentrated atom, could create an enormous universe in "seconds." The problem with that argument though is, that even with the "instantaneous" nature of anti matter, it still does not take into account that to assume that is how the universe was made, is to assume human perception can take in its enormity. Even with mathematics involved, numbers operate within equation parameters, the result, may be a number that goes on forever, but the logic to acquire said number, operates within strict limits, which alone ensure an improper perception of the universe. Thus by all logic it would APPEAR, it would appear I'm not saying that's how it is, that Einstein's unified field theory, can not be solved. There are too many limits with the way math is structured; you have parameters and logic, within parameters and logic, trying to encompas the enormity of the cosmos down to the tiniest quark. How just working the numbers alone did not kill Einstein, THAT, is a mystery right there. All the same I like people like you, who ask tough questions; in ancient times, the tyrants, were people like the Levite priests, or the Aryan peoples of Iran who corrupted Hinduism, and used religion to tyranize and control. In the middle ages, the Catholic Church in Europe, the Pagan Priests of the Americas, and the Buddhist priests of China, all used religious dogma to control people, and destroy all who opposed them. In modern times, there is a different kind of dogma, not by those who hold religious power, but by the public. What the 21st century suffers from is "democratic dogma." That is, dogma, by majority concensus; no one forces anyone to believe anything anymore, even in the world of Islam the attitudes of young people are changing. People believe what they agree to believe, and they force others to believe what they believe by the strength of their numbers thus, it could be argued that the modern danger, is bovine masses dogma. Everyone believes but no one questions, and those who question are ostracized or ignored. But you're different; sometimes its good to BE different. 67.148.120.90 (talk) 02:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC)stardingo747
Coat of Arms Image
What is the notability and connection for the coat of arms image (currently labeled with "Portuguese sketch. The English name is Judah.")? This appears to be a self-created image out of the imagination of some author. It does not seem to have any biblical basis, nor any historical significance, it is in Portuguese rather than any language that could understandably be connected with this WP article, and I am not sure what information this contributes/adds to this article.
It would seem reasonable to remove this image. — al-Shimoni (talk) 01:35, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
- Three weeks have passed and so far no response to the above. I went ahead and removed it. If you disagree, please respond to the above to discuss this before reädding it. Many thanks. — al-Shimoni (talk) 04:32, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
¿Part of a series on the History of the Palestinian territories?
Are we insane? Will be better "part of a series on the History of Israel" or are we idiots? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.154.196.54 (talk) 00:41, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Religious texts as cited source
This article cites religious texts as a true factual source, which does a grave disservice to the reader. I respectfully request the current editors to make the difference between religious claims and fact bright and clear. Right now it's reading like religious propaganda which is wholly inappropriate. Lexlex (傻) (talk) 07:10, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Extra-biblical, historical source?
Is there any historical, non-Biblical reference to a Kingdom of Judah, Kingdom of Israel, or a Unified Kingdom at all? As best as I can tell, the region was conquered from the decentralized Cannanite peoples by Egypt in the 11th C. BCE, and remained (with various levels of autonomy) under Egyptian control until the 8th C. BCE when it was conquered by the Neo-Assyrian Empire, and then later by the Roman Republic in the 1st C. BCE. As far as I can find from any scholarly resource that doesn't directly cite Judeo-Christian religious texts, is that there is no point in time where the region was not under the control of a foreign ruler. There simply isn't a period for the Kingdom of Judah to have existed. If anyone can please find any credible, non-religious, reference to the subject of this article and update the page accordingly. Gawain VIII (talk) 06:02, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
- The very nature of your question seems to push a blatant violation of WP policy, namely Misplaced Pages:No original research, since you wish to overlook the historical records of the Jewish nation recorded in the canonical Hebrew Bible in favour of your own personal theory. The Hebrew Bible contains 24 books that were compiled at different periods of time in history, and describe contemporary events during the reigns of various Israelite judges and kings, their exile and their return to the land. But as for non-biblical sources, Josephus, in his seminal work, Antiquity of the Jews - Flavius Josephus Against Apion, mentions an old Phoenician historian named Dius, whose writings (Phoenician History) were still extant in Josephus' days (circa 90 CE), and where he writes explicitly about Solomon, when he was king of Jerusalem, who sent problems to Hirom to be solved, and desired he would send others back for him to solve (See Flavius Josephus Against Apion, Book 1:17).Davidbena (talk) 10:54, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
I don't think I was advocating original research. I simply asked for reliable, non-religious, third-party sources. The Jewish Bible does not constitute "historical records of the Jewish nation" by any rational or scholarly definition. Neither is it contemporary to the events described, being most likely written between the 2nd and 6th Centuries BCE yet describing events which supposedly took place been the 2nd Millennium and 7th Century BCE. However, I do thank you for at least naming one extra-Biblical source, Josephus, although I would have preferred a citation. Dius, on the other hand, was a Hellenic contemporary of Josephus who Josephus cited as supporting his stance that Biblical narrative is historically accurate. You might be confusing Dius with Meander of Ephesus--who was Phoenician but not contemporary to the events of which he wrote about.Gawain VIII (talk) 06:28, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Davidbena, if a religious text is used as a primary source here, it makes this article a religious story with the same historical validity as the origin of Superman. Interesting, sure, but not factual. It should be using historical records as primary sources, not religious texts. The research is out there, why isn't it entered here? This is an important article. Lexlex (talk) 06:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- The Bible is a reliable source, even in Misplaced Pages's sense of the term, about what the Bible says. And what the Bible says is almost always notable on Bible-related topics. So there should be summaries in this article of what the Bible says about the Tribe of Benjamin. But there should also be references that explain how scholars see the same questions. Right now, I'm working on adding in scholarly stuff.Alephb (talk) 03:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Davidbena, if a religious text is used as a primary source here, it makes this article a religious story with the same historical validity as the origin of Superman. Interesting, sure, but not factual. It should be using historical records as primary sources, not religious texts. The research is out there, why isn't it entered here? This is an important article. Lexlex (talk) 06:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
Is this historical?
I don’t see any mentions on this article saying it’s mythical or historical. CycoMa (talk) 04:54, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- "According to the Hebrew Bible", "Biblical account", "According to the Torah", "As depicted by the Deuteronomists and post-exilic writers," "Ethiopia's traditions". IMO that points in one direction. If there are sources that discuss this from a historical perspective, they are not in the article. Apart from the mention of Finkelstein. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class Judaism articles
- High-importance Judaism articles
- C-Class Jewish history-related articles
- High-importance Jewish history-related articles
- WikiProject Jewish history articles
- C-Class Bible articles
- Mid-importance Bible articles
- WikiProject Bible articles
- C-Class Ancient Near East articles
- Mid-importance Ancient Near East articles
- Ancient Near East articles by assessment
- C-Class Ethnic groups articles
- Low-importance Ethnic groups articles
- WikiProject Ethnic groups articles
- C-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles