This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bruce leverett (talk | contribs) at 01:54, 7 September 2020 (→Lead reworking proposal). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:54, 7 September 2020 by Bruce leverett (talk | contribs) (→Lead reworking proposal)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Articles for creation B‑class | ||||||||||
|
Chess C‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Lead reworking proposal
The lead section should give "the basics in a nutshell and cultivates interest in reading on". I propose (1) changing the lead to this:
The Berlin Defence, also called the Berlin Wall, is a chess opening that begins with the moves:
e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 Bb5 Nf6
The opening is a variation of the Ruy Lopez. After a period of disuse, it experienced a resurgence in popularity when Vladimir Kramnik used it extensively against Garry Kasparov in the 2000 Chess World Championships. Strategically, the Berlin Defence is normally used as a drawing weapon by players who want to obtain a draw as Black, and by players who prefer to play defensively and reach endgames.
(2) Move the Encylopedia codes to a list at the end of the article, similar to other chess articles. I think these codes are given too much prominence in a few articles, as they're more for the specialized reader.
(3) I think the solidity/drawishness of the opening is related to the early trade of Queens. Is this worth mentioning somewhere? If so, I can try to source a good reference to back this up.Dhalamh (talk) 13:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- The reorganization seems reasonable. May I make a couple of additional suggestions:
- "Berlin Wall" does not rise to the level of being an actual name of the variation; it was used by chess journalists for a while after Kramnik revived the line, but the novelty soon wore off.
- I am not sure it is correct to state that the B.D. is "normally used as a drawing weapon", etc. (However if you can find an article or book that supports that, OK with me.) Later the article (currently) says "a solid opening for Black to use in order to achieve an equal endgame". Although there is no source for this, it is a harmless thing to say, and so it's OK. There are many openings, including this one, in which White can bail to a drawish position if that's all he wants, but that doesn't make it a "drawing weapon". Bruce leverett (talk) 01:53, 7 September 2020 (UTC)