This is an old revision of this page, as edited by David Lyons (talk | contribs) at 06:12, 8 February 2007 (rm: CoI section as per explaination). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:12, 8 February 2007 by David Lyons (talk | contribs) (rm: CoI section as per explaination)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | Biography Unassessed | ||||||
| |||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nicholas John Baker article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3 |
- Talk:Nick Baker (chef)/Archive 1: Archive Page (Nov 2005 - Feb 2006)
- Talk:Nick Baker (chef)/Archive 2: Archive Page (Feb 2006 - Jan 2007)
Baker-Devlin Spat Proposal
Before
In November 2004, after Devlin had emailed a 30-page document entitled "The Nick Baker Deception" to other media and supporters, Iris Baker called him a spammer and claimed he had harvested emails from the support site. Since she claimed Devlin had said she had "suppressed information"; "deceived the media and the public" and made "anti-Japanese statements" she also invited him to make these claims whilst in the UK so that she could proceed with a libel action. Devlin said Iris Baker's claims were "a ludicrous diversion from the inconsistencies in the case". To date no libel suit has been filed.
After?
In November 2004, after Devlin emailed a 30-page document entitled "The Nick Baker Deception" to media following the case, Iris Baker accused him of being a spammer and of harvesting emails from the support site. She also indicated her intention to sue him for libel. Devlin said her claims were "a ludicrous diversion from the inconsistencies in the case". Sparkzilla 10:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Could you move this over to medcab, where there is a space for compromise suggestions, please? David Lyons 10:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- I am not interested in mediation. Please respond here. Sparkzilla 14:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Then why have you responded several times on the mediation page and also tried to accuse me of bad faith on the NPOV talk page? David Lyons 16:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Removal of pages from Internet Archive
Before contemplating the removal of sources from the Internet Archive (notably the appeal defence pdf), it should be considered that the only person authorised to remove pages from the Internet archive is the site owner who, according to the whois record, is Iris Baker
Removing the appeal defence pdf pages from J4NB proves that members of the support group are involved in a cover-up. If the same pages are removed from the Internet archive it will provide clear evidence of Iris Baker's involvement. Sparkzilla 14:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Mediation request
Is this case still active or can I close it? --Ideogram 13:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- I understand that Medcab requires both parties to agree to mediation. Since Sparkzilla refuses, as far as I am concerned, it is closed. David Lyons 13:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Closing. --Ideogram 13:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Removed user talk page discussion
Removed a CoI discussion originally held on my talk page and wholesale copy & pasted here by Sparkzilla. It gave the impression it was originally discussed here, was out of context and further, contains material not compatible with an article talk page. Removed material. I have added a further explanation to Sparkzilla's talk page. David Lyons 05:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- This information does not belong to you, and you cannot remove it. It is germane to the discussion of your CoI regarding Nick Baker, and to the discussion of Baker in general. Just keep reminding yourself - is this really what I want to be doing with my time? Sparkzilla 06:05, 8 February 2007 (UTC)