Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 23:44, 14 January 2022 (Signing comment by StevenCojo - "→Undeletion of page "IndieGala": new section"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

January 2022 with Women in Red

Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219 Online events: New: Climate (year-long initiative) | Women in business | US territories Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2021 Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month. Go to Women in RedJoin WikiProject Women in Red Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

illimity

Hi @MrsSnoozyTurtle: thank you once again for your kindness and valuable advice regarding the draft: illimity :)

I will then proceed with removing the tag about subjective wording as agreed upon in our previous discussion. Regards, Giulia Comandini (talk) 14:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

• Hello Giulia Comandini. You are most welcome, all the best for your Misplaced Pages endeavours. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:15, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Draftifying

Hey MST, thanks as always for your hard work. But I am going to revert a few of your recent moves of articles to the draftspace: per WP:DRAFTIFY, such moves are only appropriate 1) if a deletion discussion concludes with consensus to draftify, or 2) if the article is recently created. Draftify outside of a deletion discussion is not appropriate for longstanding articles, even if they are of low quality. Let me know if you have any questions. UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

For further background, see this discussion from 2020 where consensus was established. UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Undeletion of page "IndieGala"

The original IndieGala page was removed out of lack of references and low content. I researched and remade it in its entirety, by taking inspiration and even adapting other existing pages from the same industry branch, such as HumbleBundle, GreenManGaming etc. some were taken word by word. This page stood up, just like others for years until then. It is an over 10 year old site with a certain reputation already. The updated version contained information about the evolution from a small bundle retailer to a publisher/developer, charity contributor and involvement in various controversies, all factually documented by reputable sites and sources. I am not sure in what way can the article be considered Promotional when factual information is presented as well as negative criticism brought, as well as various sources to support it. Unless counting sourcing 10 year or articles that present their first bundle as promotion, of course.

Please advise upon what part constitutes "promotion" in what way can it be improved in order to not go against the rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by StevenCojo (talk • contribs) 23:43, 14 January 2022 (UTC)