This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Girth Summit (talk | contribs) at 09:27, 10 February 2022 (Marking case as closed (using spihelper.js)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:27, 10 February 2022 by Girth Summit (talk | contribs) (Marking case as closed (using spihelper.js))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Croonerman
Croonerman (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Croonerman/Archive.
09 February 2022
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- Joan4505A (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Same tendencies as last sock, Only exists to promote himself. Additionally looks to be recreated artivles on his Mother Helen Bousquet. Unbroken Chain (talk) 04:19, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- (Redacted) Unbroken Chain (talk) 14:11, February 9, 2022 (UTC)
- (Redacted) -- Valjean (talk) 00:13, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Please keep comments focused on whether someone is a sock, not who they may be in real life. If an account claims to be Evans, as Croonerman sox have in the past, that is admissible here as evidence of sockpuppetry, but shouldn't be mistaken for an endorsement of the claim as being true. Trying to prove an off-wiki identity is WP:OUTING. -- Tamzin (she/they) 00:45, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Compare to to edit summaries at Special:Contributions/Miami01830. Identical writing style with identical POV and a shared "enemy", and I think the writing tells should be pretty obvious.
Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me Please block indefinitely as a proven sock of Croonerman. -- Tamzin (she/they) 00:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Done Girth Summit (blether) 09:27, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
09 February 2022
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
Suspected sockpuppets
- 189.206.144.171 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Please see evidence in current open case above for User:Joan4505A Unbroken Chain (talk) 14:13, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Yes, I'm being attacked from all sides. Because I removed candid snapshots with celebrities from his Misplaced Pages article. I'm sure we will all be named in his next lawsuit. Liz 20:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- After the last barrage, I gave this IP account a short block for personal attacks. I'm sure they will be back. Liz 20:36, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sounds reasonable, Tamzin. I'd like to pass this case along to a different admin who isn't a target of the personal attacks. Liz 06:49, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Closing with a factual finding that this IP == Croonerman, per the above section. The existing DE block is for longer than Croonerman has been on this IP, so I don't see cause to lengthen. If the IP returns to Croonerman-like edits after the block expires, please report to AIV or any available admin with a link to this comment. Thank you. -- Tamzin (she/they) 00:58, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Categories: