Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 17:43, 11 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg 02:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Felix Eldridge

• Articles for deletion/Felix Eldridge
• Articles for deletion/Felix Eldridge (2nd nomination)

Felix Eldridge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. This page was previously kept after a deletion review, however the article now fails to meet the notability requirements as set out in WP:POLITICIAN and WP:BIO1E. The article was retained due to the notability of events in 2005. Current day sources are non existent or peripheral Australian Matt (talk) 03:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Australian Matt (talk) 03:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
• Delete no sources on a blp of a nobody.Bali ultimate (talk) 11:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable.--Grahame (talk) 23:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
• Keep President of a national student union is notable--and in this case, particularly because he engaged in nationally noted events. Since he was notable for what he did in 2005, he remains notable always. We're an encyclopedia, not just a current events web site. I do not see how anyone who has looked at the article can fail to notice there is indeed a source present, & one that shows his presidency, which is not peripheral. Needs more sources of course,, and they're right there in Google News Archive. . . DGG ( talk ) 00:20, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Comment From my perspective, the subject was not notable "for what he did in 2005", but the events occuring at the time (the introduction of Voluntary student unionism were notable. Australian Matt (talk) 09:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

• Delete Student politicians are not notable, not unless they stage a riot or something, NN YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 06:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
• Delete Despite its pretensions the NUS isn't well known to most university students, and its office holders receive little to no coverage in reliable sources so notability isn't established here. Nick-D (talk) 07:20, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.