Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 03:27, 16 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Carlito and Santino Marella

Carlito and Santino Marella (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable tag team as of yet. Per precedent, teaming together for one match is definitely not notable. Kane and The Big Show and Eugene and William Regal were both just deleted as non-notable, and they both won the tag championship. Clearly, this is also a crystal ball issue. The information is best kept is their individual articles, especially for now. Nikki311 23:22, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —Nikki311 23:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete NN tag team Doc Strange (talk) 23:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete No sources, no claims of notability. They have only wrestled 1 match together, so there is no way to predict if they will be notable or not since mid-carders get put into make-shift tag teams all the time (i.e. Eddie Guerrero and Rey Mysterio, Edge and Rey Mysterio, Eugene and William Regal, Jim Duggan and Super Crazy, Hardcore Holly and Billy Gunn, Hardcore Holly and Scorpio, etc.). TJ Spyke 00:13, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete They wrestled one match together, which is hardly enough to make them a notable tag team. Calgary (talk) 00:20, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ford MF (talk) 00:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not sourced and definetly not notable. NiciVampireHeart (talk) 02:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Nn. D.M.N. (talk) 11:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Completely NN. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 00:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Comment Has anyone noticed the under construction tag can everyone please recognize the tag's guidelines including the do not delete until finshed notice, so respectfully refrain from deletion--68.199.62.0 (talk) 05:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

The problem with that is since the team has only wrestled once they are not remotly close to being notiable yet. Teams that have been together for months have been deleted. In short, no ammount of construction can save this article at this time so that argument is invalid. If they do become notibale in the future the article can be recreated then. --67.68.153.60 (talk) 08:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

• Keep per Misplaced Pages:Give an article a chance. The article while short does assert notability and has a reliable reference. Happy New Year! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 18:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Note to closing admin. The page that Le Grand mentions is just an essay and isn't a requirement to follow when editing. RobJ1981 (talk) 06:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - iMatthew (talk) 00:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - Nn. Cheers, LAX 11:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.