This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Atlantic306 (talk | contribs) at 19:35, 31 May 2022 (→Colors TV: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:35, 31 May 2022 by Atlantic306 (talk | contribs) (→Colors TV: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Upwork profile
Hope you are well. Its a humble request that please stop damaging pages where you were not hired and/or you see them on Upwork. I know your Upwork profile but I don't want to get in details. You can't win by damaging others, this is not healthy for you or anyone in the long run. What is yours will be yours, you are earning very well there so let's make a good working environment instead of creating problems to satisfy our greed and ego. Just think it won't benefit anyone and no one can handle all the work alone. Hope you will take this under consideration. Good luck stay blessed. Thanks 20:16, 25 May 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.66.19.248 (talk)
- Hello 41.66.19.248. Is that so? I am not afraid of the truth, so which Upwork profile to you think is mine? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:26, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Mark Lynn
Hello, MrsSnoozyTurtle,
I see articles that you have PROD'd and concur with your decisions on these articles so I was wondering what you thought of this rather promotional article. Lots of references but it seems like this optometrist is primarily influential due to his monetary gifts which, to be honest, are fairly common among the wealthy class in the U.S. Hoping you could give it a review. Thanks! Liz 02:59, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Liz. I'm humbled that you asked for my thoughts on the article. Thank you. I looked through the article and sources before reading your message, and ended up having the same mixed thoughts as you! It's quite a tricky call regarding whether he has standalone notability or it is WP:INHERITED from the two stadia which he purchased the naming rights to. Sorry, this indecision probably isn't much help...
- On second thought, given his business activities, I suspect there is more coverage out there that would get him across the line for WP:NBIO. But I agree that the article is quite promotional, and there is something fishy about its author (they made some very sophisticated AfD arguments in their first edits). I hope this mess of thoughts is somehow useful! Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 04:09, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- This is exactly what I was looking for, thank you for taking the time to evaluate the article for me. It's hard for me to appreciate an article that is basically about a rich optometrist who has structures named after himself when we have articles about academics and authors deleted because of marginal notability but if you think Lynn is borderline notable, then I won't take any further action. I wouldn't be surprised to see it nominated for deletion at some point in its future. Liz 19:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 May 2022
- From the team: A changing of the guard
- News and notes: 2022 Wikimedia Board elections
- Community view: Have your say in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Board elections
- In the media: Putin, Jimbo, Musk and more
- Special report: Three stories of Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war
- Discussion report: Portals, April Fools, admin activity requirements and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19 revisited
- Technology report: A new video player for Wikimedia wikis
- Featured content: Featured content of April
- Interview: Misplaced Pages's pride
- Serendipity: Those thieving image farms
- Recent research: 35 million Twitter links analysed
- Tips and tricks: The reference desks of Misplaced Pages
- Traffic report: Strange highs and strange lows
- News from Diff: Winners of the Human rights and Environment special nomination by Wiki Loves Earth announced
- News from the WMF: The EU Digital Services Act: What’s the Deal with the Deal?
- From the archives: The Onion and Misplaced Pages
- Humour: A new crossword
Draft:Colors TV
I noticed you moved this to Draft: space. I'm not really sure that this is covered by WP:Draftify, and suspect AfD might have been more appropriate? Equally, I know you will have had your reasons for doing so. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Faddle 🇺🇦 08:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- An explanation as to why 2d of WP:DRAFTIFY does not apply is needed. Whpq (talk) 12:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
June events from Women in Red
Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Diamond Schmitt Architects
You had proposed deletion for the article just a little over a week ago. I contested that proposed deletion and left an explanation on the article talk page. Tagging the article for speedy deletion was not appropriate. -- Whpq (talk) 12:47, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Colors TV
Hi, i've reverted your move of this article to draftspace as it is a two year old article and the timelimit for draftification is articles younger than 3 months. Also the article has been edited by many editors apart from the blocked ones including myself so movement to draft on coi and upe grounds is also inappropriate on those grounds but the main point is the age of the article, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 19:35, 31 May 2022 (UTC)