Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 75.166.143.100 (talk) at 21:22, 14 August 2022 (→Coup d'état: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

⚖️

Thanks

Honestly I have to thank you for your investigation and taking care of that page. You did a great job looking info details, you asked if we should keep the story and add it's BS or remove it, I suggest removing it since I wanted in the future to add some actual controversies into that page. If you check my edit history you can see I'm editing into Albanian politics and also beyond that, I could use some help time to time or perhaps I could help you in the future :) Anyway thank again and take care. S.G ReDark (talk) 14:35, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. Kind Regards, Anythingyouwant (talk) 17:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Also side-note: my replies are placed in a weird format, I'm on mobile perhaps that's the case? How can I fix that? S.G ReDark (talk) 20:33, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Mandy Rice-Davies applies

Now you seem to be advancing from obstructionism and repetitive pursuit of rejected POVs to outright edit-warring. There was no consensus on talk for the edits of yours that I reverted. Per BRD, it is you who should now summarize your view and seek consensus on the talk page. Your history since returning from your TBAN has been to pursue direct and indirect insinuation and wiki-lawyering to undermine the established longstanding content of various pages in pursuit of your political POVs and obsession with right-wing abortion-related policies. None of this is news to you, nor would you deny it AFAIK. Please self-revert and use the talk page. SPECIFICO talk 20:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

I don’t appreciate your edit style, where you encounter an edit that includes some material you don’t like, so you just delete the whole thing. How about if you try only deleting the parts you don’t like, and engage at talk page if the rest has already been under discussion? I didn’t come close to 3RR here, by the way. Anythingyouwant (talk) 20:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Coup d'état

Your edit to this article was reverted. It is not directly related to the subject, it is not a widely held view, and it appears to have been inserted in the article to weaken the focus of the page in order to promote your denial of matters relating to the January 6 attack. Please self revert and use the article talk page or NPOVN. If you continue to edit-war politics-related articles, you may be sanctioned. SPECIFICO talk 20:32, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

This is extremely well-sourced material, and you have not cited or referred to any reliable source that even slightly contradicts it or expresses a different point of view. Your speculations about motives or plots are irrelevant to Misplaced Pages policy, this material has nothing to do with abortion either. Please stop roving around Misplaced Pages and deleting material you don’t like, or material written by editors you don’t like. I don’t do it to you, please don’t do it to me. Anythingyouwant (talk) 20:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

@SPECIFICO @Anythingyouwant It’s clearly about time that we file a formal ANI to hold Anythingyouwant accountable for violating the conditions he agreed to when his then permanent TBAN was lifted in the probationary sense of it. AYW … since you are doubling down on being the victim of a boomerang here, I will let you preemptively file the ANI for us so you can address your grievances first in good-faith since your unusual defense from you so far in service of obvious edit warring, forum shopping, POV-pushing and wiki-gaming is based upon your allegations against others that you are somehow being provoked into this behavior, or that we are missing something here. When confronted by your past TBAN, you’ve even double-down on some notion that you did nothing wrong to earn that initial sanction.

@SPECIFICO I’m copying you on this because it feels like AYW is trying to scapegoat you, for lack of a better word. But, also, this is simply going in circles and no amount of arguing with the disruptive editor is going to fix this. It’s beating a dead horse.

Back to you AYW, @Anythingyouwant I will give you 24 hours to preemptively file the WP:ANI, and hopefully that good faith gesture will inoculate you from any future appearance that you are being “framed” or “unfairly targeted” as you are insinuating over and over again. However, should you fail to do so, then I will simply go forward with the ANI myself which, based upon several incidents I’ve objectively observed, will not end well in your favor. This is a case of WP:ROPE is I have ever saw one. And unfortunately I’m out and about and can’t even properly login to my account to effectively deal with this now. But I will be in front of a computer tomorrow so hopefully by then I can give this the necessary attention, and by then I pray you will use your time effectively mount a proper defense and self-reflect. I really want to believe this is some kind of misunderstanding here AYW, so please us the ANI process as the proper forum to explain why this edit warring and disruptive WP:POINTY behavior is the only way to deal with the rest of us! Otherwise, please don’t complain about being persecuted when I file my ANI in the coming days when you only have yourself to blame for your predictament. Will be watching for your ANI, and please watch for mine sans your efforts to resolve this amicably there yourself— since you’ve left us no choice by this point and have exhausted our good will and faith in you. Good luck AYM! Nothing personal. 75.166.143.100 (talk) 21:22, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

"Misplaced Pages:DENIALS" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Misplaced Pages:DENIALS and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 13#Misplaced Pages:DENIALS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sideswipe9th (talk) 22:54, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Would you please self-revert this edit, as it's disruptive? I am not the only editor who has removed that redirect (, ), nor was I the first to do so. Sideswipe9th (talk) 23:37, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

I’m not sure what difference it makes, but I have expanded that comment in response to this request of yours. Anythingyouwant (talk) 23:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)