This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) at 20:56, 29 October 2022 (Archiving 1 discussion to Misplaced Pages talk:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 16. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:56, 29 October 2022 by ClueBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion to Misplaced Pages talk:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive 16. (BOT))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Administrators' noticeboard page. |
|
 | To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, several subpages of Misplaced Pages talk:Administrators' noticeboard redirect here. |
 | This is not the page to report problems to administrators, or discuss administrative issues.
This page is for discussion of the Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard page (and some of its subpages, including /Incidents).
|
 | This noticeboard has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
 Archives | |||||||||||||||||
Index
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
proper response?
in the talk page for Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 I realized that a user have completely removed a whole section of the gameplay section and stated "Apart from needing a c/e, most of this is not sufficiently verified (simply citing official websites is not evidence); a lot more reliable sources are needed, even if it means waiting until nearer release.)" despite there being hundreds of hours worth of content on multiple platforms and despite several of the citations containing quotes from the devs. I was wondering if this was the proper response? Td 19:58, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Draft
I request to make a draft for Adrenaline Rush Professional wrestling. Picturefoxinvasion1 (talk) 20:17, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- Picturefoxinvasion1 This page is for discussing the operation of the Administrators Noticeboard, and is not the board itself. Furthermore, you don't need anyone's permission to create a draft article, though it is a difficult task. Please see Articles for creation. 331dot (talk) 20:21, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
"Misplaced Pages:CESSPIT" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Misplaced Pages:CESSPIT and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 14#Misplaced Pages:CESSPIT until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Levivich (talk) 20:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Talk pages for archives
See Misplaced Pages talk:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1111 -- the {{section sizes}} template at the top of this page is helpful for navigating the current page, but we do not have this benefit while trying to find something in archives. I have messed around a little in userspace when trying to find specific threads, but it occurs to me that other people may find themselves in the same situation; I propose, therefore, that I do a run and put the section sizes template on the talk pages for archives. A preliminary review shows that there are precisely ten extant talk pages, almost all of which contain just a couple comments (which would not be removed -- the section sizes header would just sit above them, as it does here). Here they are:
| All existing ANI archive talk pages |
|---|
|
An example of what I'm talking about can be found at Misplaced Pages talk:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1111. jp×g 08:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC) jp×g 08:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Could you clarify please - are you wanting to add {{section sizes}} to every ANI archive talk page, or just these ten? As a note, I've un-transcluded those pages, since I don't think it is necessary. Also, to ask the potentially dumb question - what does this template do that the ToC on the primary archive page not do (other than give the sizes of the sections)? Primefac (talk) 08:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- I would support this (for either these 10 pages or for any page -- As long as it were by default collapsed). It's essentially an index of each page, included on each page. It has the sizes per-sub-section and per-section and it helps verify the overall Byte-size of the page, which is also useful for archive maintenance and finding where to manually archive something to maintain, for instance, a 100k limit. I really like this idea. — Shibbolethink 12:43, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- If it's just the ten pages, I don't think anyone needs consensus to do that (be bold and all that). If it's all 1k pages a bot should probably deal with that. I still don't really see how it's all that much more beneficial than the ToC (especially since the "page size" thing is kind of controlled by bots these days) but don't take that to mean I'm strictly opposed. Primefac (talk) 12:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- I would support this (for either these 10 pages or for any page -- As long as it were by default collapsed). It's essentially an index of each page, included on each page. It has the sizes per-sub-section and per-section and it helps verify the overall Byte-size of the page, which is also useful for archive maintenance and finding where to manually archive something to maintain, for instance, a 100k limit. I really like this idea. — Shibbolethink 12:43, 29 October 2022 (UTC)