Misplaced Pages

User talk:KoA

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BilledMammal (talk | contribs) at 04:09, 31 October 2022 (→Bothriospilini‎: ce). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 04:09, 31 October 2022 by BilledMammal (talk | contribs) (→Bothriospilini‎: ce)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
  • genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed
  • pseudoscience and fringe science
They should not be given alerts for those areas.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6


This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present.

I'm sometimes online sporadically, although typically at least once a day unless it's around the weekend. I'll usually respond pretty quickly to any questions, but real life takes priority, so I may not always be the quickest to respond. Thanks for your patience if I'm offline for a bit.


RFC on Self published Sources

I made a policy RFC at WP: VPP to discuss what we were disagreeing on at WP: BLP. Feel free to comment there as to what you think is the more appropriate wording would be. --Kyohyi (talk) 15:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Re RfA Discussion

I'm here to let you know that I saw your response to my thoughts, which I appreciate. (I'm not responding myself because I feel like I'd take too many words to respond well) —Danre98 06:51, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Bothriospilini‎

I've reverted your reversion at this article, as it will unnecessarily complicate the ongoing AfD. As I said in my edit summary, if it ends as "no consensus" or "keep", please reinstate your reversion and I will open an RfC at that article about what version should be used.

I will also mention that your edit summary was inaccurate; Elmidae was objecting to the redirects, with the inclusion of content in higher level articles being caught up in their rollback, so to partially reinstate it (with edits to address various concerns raised, and to include links to the lower-order articles) was not edit warring - I note they, nor anyone else until you, have not objected to that action. BilledMammal (talk) 04:09, 31 October 2022 (UTC)