Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 185.176.244.75 (talk) at 20:43, 12 April 2022 (→Background and passage). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997

Enacted by	the 105th United States Congress
Effective	November 19, 1997
Citations
Public law	Pub. L. 105–89 (text) (PDF)
Legislative history
Introduced in the House by Dave Camp (R-MI) on February 27, 1997 Committee consideration by Ways and Means Passed the House on April 30, 1997 (Yeas: 416; Nays: 5) Passed the Senate on November 8, 1997 (Unanimous consent) Signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 19, 1997

The Adoption and Safe Families Act (ASFA, Public Law 105–89) was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 19, 1997, after having been approved by the United States Congress earlier in the month.

Background and passage

ASFA was enacted in an attempt to correct problems inherent within the foster care system that deterred adoption. Many of these problems had stemmed from an earlier bill, the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980, although they had not been anticipated when that law was passed, as states decided to interpret that law as requiring biological families be kept together no matter what. The biggest change to the law was how ASFA amended Title IV-E of the Social Security Act regarding funding.

Moreover, ASFA marked a fundamental change to child welfare thinking, shifting the emphasis towards children's health and safety concerns and away from a policy of reuniting children with their birth parents without regard to prior abusiveness. As such, ASFA was considered the most sweeping change to the U.S. adoption and foster care system in some two decades. One of ASFA's lead sponsors, Republican Senator John H. Chafee of Rhode Island, said, "We will not continue the current system of always putting the needs and rights of the biological parents first. ... It's time we recognize that some families simply cannot and should not be kept together."

Ideas for the bill originated with both Democrats and Republicans. First Lady of the United States Hillary Clinton originally voiced interest in the issue of orphaned children in an article she wrote in 1995. She then held public events to bring the issue exposure, and met with U.S. Department of Health and Human Services officials and private foundation executives over policy questions and recommendations. She cited the Act as the achievement which she initiated and shepherded that provided her with the greatest satisfaction. The bill began in Congress with bipartisan support, then became contentious over issues of terminating birth parents' rights to children and funding levels for programs to keep children out of foster care. Hillary Clinton played a key role in finding a compromise between Republicans and Democrats on the latter issue after negotiations first broke down.

In greeting the final measure, Bill Clinton stated that the bill "makes clear that children's health and safety are the paramount concerns."

Major provisions and tactics

The major provisions of the law include:

• Requires that States move to terminate parental rights for children who have been in Foster Care for 15 out of the last 22 months
• Exceptions to the 15/22 rule include:
  1. When the child is in a Foster Home with a biological relative (Kinship Care)
  2. When the Agency documents a compelling reason why parental termination is not in the Child's best interest
  3. When the State has failed to provide services necessary for reunification
• Requires that Permanency Hearings be held every 12 months
• Clarifies cases in which States are not required to reunite Families (Aggravated Circumstances)
• Expands family preservation and support services
• Extends subsidies for adoptive children
• Provides incentives for States to improve adoption rates
• Requires States to document efforts to move children toward adoption
• Expands health care coverage for adoptive children
• Provides funding for efforts at encouraging adoption
• Clarifies that interstate boundaries should not delay adoption.

Impact

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (November 2020)

The law required individual states to be in compliance with it in order to continue receiving federal funds for child welfare. Thus, each state had to pass legislation compatible with ASFA; in practice, those legislative actions varied widely. As a result, some states have relied upon the three exceptions in the law more as part of stressing reunification, while other states have stressed adoption.

Twelve years after the Implementation of ASFA, the Urban Institute's Center for Social Policy did a study reviewing the effectiveness of AFSA. In the study conclusion The Urban Institute declared that AFSA had increased the number of children leaving foster care, but that AFSA had failed to properly support blood relatives. AFSA's shortcomings discussed by the Urban Institute lead policy makers to create the Family First Prevention Services Act which builds on ASFA's policies.

The number of youth adopted from care has steadily risen since ASFA's passage: up from roughly 38,000 in 1998 to nearly 60,000 in 2017, according to federal data.

“The act's financial incentives have disrupted families permanently by the speedy termination of parental rights, without the accompanying move from foster care to adoptive homes," said Texas Tech University law professor DeLeith Gossett, in a report published in 2018 by the Memphis Law Review. "The programs that the Adoption and Safe Families Act govern thwart its very purpose as children continue to languish in foster care waiting for permanent adoptive homes, often until they age out of the system into negative life outcomes." “ASFA was blamed for leaving a lot of children as orphans and that certainly wasn't the intention of ASFA," she said. "There has been concern we moved to permanency but didn't pay attention to the parent's needs."

See also

• Adoption 2002
• Uniform Adoption Act

References

1. ^ Seelye, Katherine Q. (November 17, 1997). "Clinton to Approve Sweeping Shift in Adoption". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-03-15.
2. ^ Sengupta, Somini (October 29, 2000). "Campaigns Soft-Pedal On Children and the Poor". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-03-15.
3. ^ "First Lady Biography: Hillary Clinton". National First Ladies' Library. Archived from the original on September 2, 2006. Retrieved August 22, 2006.
4. ^ Hort, Katherine A. (2000). "Is Twenty-two Months Beyond the Best Interest of the Child? ASFA's Guidelines for the Termination of Parental Rights". Fordham Urban Law Journal. 29 (6).
5. "Intentions and Results: A Look Back at The Adoption and Safe Families Act". Urban Institute. Retrieved 2020-04-29.
6. Lindell, Karen U.; Sorenson, Christina K.; Mangold, Susan V. (2020-03-01). "The Family First Prevention Services Act: A New Era of Child Welfare Reform". Public Health Reports. 135 (2): 282–286. doi:10.1177/0033354919900892. ISSN 0033-3549. PMC 7036616. PMID 31995716.
7. "Adoption & Foster Care Statistics". Children's Bureau | ACF. Retrieved 2020-11-16.
8. "Gossett, The Client (2018)" (PDF). The University of Memphis Law Review. 48. 2018-12-09.

External links

• Full text of Adoption and Safe Families Act

v t e Hillary Clinton
11th Chancellor of Queen's University Belfast (2020–present) 67th United States Secretary of State (2009–2013) US Senator from New York (2001–2009) First Lady of the United States (1993–2001) First Lady of Arkansas (1979–1981, 1983–1992)
Secretary of State	Tenure as Secretary Foreign trips Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review Foreign policy of the Obama administration Hillary Doctrine Email controversy UN Security Council Resolution 1888 UN Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict
US senator	Senate career Family Entertainment Protection Act Flag Protection Act of 2005
First Lady	Tenure as First Lady 1993 health care reform Hillaryland Travel office controversy FBI files controversy "Vast right-wing conspiracy" Vital Voices Save America's Treasures State Children's Health Insurance Program Adoption and Safe Families Act Foster Care Independence Act White House Millennium Council
Arkansas	Legal career Career in corporate governance Tenures as First Lady of Arkansas Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families Rose Law Firm Legal Services Corporation Whitewater controversy Cattle futures controversy
Philanthropic	Clinton Foundation State Department controversy Onward Together
Speeches and policies	Political positions "Women's Rights Are Human Rights" (1995) "Basket of deplorables" (2016)
Writings	Bibliography Senior thesis (1969) It Takes a Village (1996) Dear Socks, Dear Buddy (1998) An Invitation to the White House (2000) Living History (2003) Hard Choices (2014) Stronger Together (2016) What Happened (2017) The Book of Gutsy Women (2019) State of Terror (2021)
Electoral history	Senatorial elections 2000 US Senate election in New York 2006 US Senate election in New York 2008 Democratic presidential primaries Campaign Endorsements Debates Convention 2016 US presidential election Campaign Endorsements political non-political screen and stage performers other celebrities Democratic primaries debates running mate selection convention Democratic opposition General election debates Hillary Victory Fund
Legacy	Awards and honors Books about Public image Clinton National Airport
Popular culture	Hillary 1984 Saturday Night Live parodies Hillary Clinton: The Power of Women (2015 documentary) Hillary and Clinton (2016 play) Hillary (2020 documentary)
Family	Bill Clinton (husband presidency) Chelsea Clinton (daughter) Hugh E. Rodham (father) Dorothy Howell Rodham (mother) Hugh Rodham (brother) Tony Rodham (brother) Socks (cat) Buddy (dog) Whitehaven (residence)
Other	Situation Room (2011 photograph) Activities after 2016

• Acts of the 105th United States Congress
• Adoption law in the United States
• Foster care in the United States
• United States federal child welfare legislation