Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by THF (talk | contribs) at 22:07, 14 March 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

• ]

Template:RFCheader

• Talk:Learning organization -- Edit-war problem: Is this edit appropriate? See also User_talk:Stevenson-Perez#Your_contributions. 22:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Rebuttable Presumption -- Should it be consolidated with articles on other kinds of presumption? --Jon Roland 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Conclusive Presumption -- Should it be consolidated with articles on other kinds of presumption? --Jon Roland 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Presumption of innocence -- Should it be consolidated with articles on other kinds of presumption? --Jon Roland 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
• Dispute whether the Mustafa Hefny Picture added in the U.S. subsection of the White People article should be removed. 16:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• Is this new and amended version of the article appropriate on its own? Please comment here.18:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Constitution -- Is a newly-added section "Principles of constitutional design" POV? 17:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Pornography_addiction#Dobson, "opponents" out -- Is James Dobson a reliable source or an extremist source? Is this article NPOV? 15:27, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Norouz#Merge_2 Should the Kurdish celebration of Norouz be merged into Norouz or should it exist in summary style. 20:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Upper Canada College#Request for Comment Should sections on recent scandals and ethnic/sex/diversity issues remain in the main article? Or should they be placed into the subsidiary article on the History of Upper Canada College with a summary in the main history section.
• Talk:Waldorf education#Request for Comment - need input on if the article has improved or not. In particular whether it is still unbalanced with respect to NPOV, written in a brochure style or deals with controversies in an inappropriate manner. Thanks in advance. 17:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Great Neck South High School. Dispute over whether it is appropriate to state that all students "have at least average ability". 01:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Islamophobia. Edit warring by editors who evidently believe that there really is no such thing as Islamphobia, and the Muslims have only themselves to blame. 00:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Stillwater Area High School. One editor isnists on adding long sections of exhaustive detail concerning the performance of the school's sports teams. 22:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:1957 Georgia Memorial to Congress#Rfc - are recent changes to the article helpful and do they adhere to NPOV? Which of two versions of the article is preferable? 15:02, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:North American Man/Boy Love Association#Request for comment - This organisation espouses legalisation of sexual relationship between men and boys. A fairly heated argument has developped over whether this article should be added to Category:LGBT organizations. Further imput welcomed. 01:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:List of male performers in gay porn films - Should each entry in this list be individually sourced? -10:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Religious_views_on_masturbation#Request_for_commentsImproper use of ref tag as platform for making unsupported point. 16:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming – following removal of a major POV vandal/warrior, the research and usage of neuro-linguistic programming (documented and cited in depth) is felt to be seriously misrepresented by the present article, which still reflects the vandal's viewpoint that it is marginal, little used by credible bodies, and pseudoscience. Because of the damage sustained to the article during its 18 month trolling, help is requested from uninvolved editors to review the information summarized and to help ensure the article fairly reflects the subject and neither unfairly maligns it, nor unfairly exaggerates it. 12:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Prostitution in Thailand — disagreements over relevance and suitability of metrial on men who supposedly fall in love with prostitutes, as well as general concerns about length, detail, and tone of the article. 12:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Double_Ten_Day#RfC:_inclusion_as_a_Chinese_holiday - Please comment on whether Double Ten Day should be included in the category of Chinese holidays. 12:16, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Race_and_intelligence#RFC_test_case:_the_first_sentence - Please comment on a revision of the first sentence of the article. 04:05, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Sexuality_of_Abraham_Lincoln#Request_for_Comment:_Sexuality_of_Abraham_Lincoln The article has been nominted twice for deletion both times the outcome was keep. An edit war has taken place in the past with this article and is on the verge of begining again. The aricle is heavily weighted to one POV. 00:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
• Killed in Action An edit war currently exists with large blocks of information removed, including a contested classical reference. However, the article has already achieved "Start-Class" quality rating according to the Military history Wikiproject. Attacks abound in other articles, and they've spread here now. So far, users have commented on an "article cleanup" and "nice clean-up" when important sections get removed, threatening the article's quality. Also, edits often revert to poor style, including the passive voice. UPDATED 21:11, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• White people White people edit war on the relation of the term to the literal meaning of white prompted protection. In larger discussion, there is debate about whether (1) to describe white as literally inaccurate; (2) skin pigmentation/melanisation might be a better description; (3) the European historical context and/or Eurocentrism should be specified in the text; (4) whether color metaphors for race is an acceptable link. (5) Relevancy of definition of white in physics 16:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC); restored as consensus not quite agreed 01:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Foster_care#Request for Comment Disagreement on placement of a section. Controversy surrounds whether article deals with USA specifically or is applicable to other jurisdictions. Comments would be appreciated. 20:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Real Social Dynamics claims are being made that is it advertising and spam 03:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Talk: Girl-girl: Request for Comment Should Girl-girl redirect to Lesbianism in erotica or Pornography? This is turning into a two-person edit war (one of the parties being myself). I'd like a third-party's opionion on this. (Preferably several third parties.) 02:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)