This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Galobtter (talk | contribs) at 00:11, 5 May 2023 (Reverted 2 edits by 137.103.35.169 (talk): WP:NOTFORUM). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:11, 5 May 2023 by Galobtter (talk | contribs) (Reverted 2 edits by 137.103.35.169 (talk): WP:NOTFORUM)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Archives | |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 183 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Moved comment to talk
--— Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.222.46 (talk • contribs) 11:29, 13 October 2010
Allyl iodide
Old, unlikely to be of broad interest, and pretty specialized so removed: "], a chemical building block for ], ]s, ], and ], can be synthesized by using elemental ] and ] on glycerol.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Datta|first=Rasek Lal|title=The Preparation of Allyl Iodide|journal=Journal of the American Chemical Society|year=1914|volume=36|pages=1005–1007|doi=10.1021/ja02182a023|url=https://books.google.com/?id=BrI7AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA1005|issue=5}}</ref>"--Smokefoot (talk) 14:42, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
How much Glycerol(in % of weight or volume) a typical cough syrup contains?
Is cough syrup the only edible Glycerol product?
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00408-020-00390-x
"Excipients such as sugars, glycerol, and menthol are now accepted as active ingredients in cough medicines and although there is some clinical support for the efficacy of menthol as an antitussive,, there is no published research on the benefits of sugars and glycerol and more research is needed in this area".
--ee1518 (talk) 18:56, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, god no. Not by a long shot. Glycerin itself is edible, although there are different grades, with food-grade glycerin being the purest. I don't know how much is found in cough syrup, and it's likely it varies from manufacturer to manufacturer, and even product to product. I highly doubt it's an active ingredient, but rather just used as a sweetener.
- Glycerin is found in a lot of foods. It occurs naturally in most meats and vegetables as triglycerides, which is broken down in the stomach to form glycerin and fats, and glycerin is easily absorbed by the small intestines, so it never makes it to the large intestines, unless used as a suppository. It's also a byproduct of fermentation, so you find it naturally is things like beer, wine, and vinegar.
- Glycerin is added to many foods as a sweetener, thickener, emulsifying agent, and many other uses. It's often added to dairy products, like cream, cheese and yogurt. It's used in jams ans jellies, processed fruits and vegetables, canned foods, dried foods, sauces, ketchups and mustards, baked goods, puddings, swetteners, butter, peanut butter, and the list goes on and on. Of course, there's a difference between food-grade glycerin and crude glyerin. Zaereth (talk) 20:04, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Medical, et al, section
Claims there is no topical treatment for 3rd degree burns. Hmmm. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia's web-article on 3D burns claims in the treatment section that treatment may include "antibiotic creams or ointments" (which by definition are topical). The false or at least certainly misleading claim (misleading since AB treat or prevent infections subsequent to a 3DB rather than the damage itself, but since it is part of the treatment (in some cases) and aids in healing, that distinction is almost impossible to justify). This article is not about burns, and I suggest the false and quite unnecessary claim be removed.174.131.48.89 (talk) 08:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- You're correct. Someone must have misinterpreted the source, which at the end correctly says that no dressings have been approved for third-degree burns. The source, I might add, is a press release for a glycerin-based dressing for use in first and second-degree burns, but you can't dress a third-degree burn because that would be like putting a bandage on gangrene. The dead and dying tissue has to be removed and new skin grafted into place. But topical ointments and gels? Sure, those have to be used. So I say go ahead and remove the sentence. You can easily do that yourself. Just leave a little edit summary at the box at the bottom pointing people to this discussion. Zaereth (talk) 20:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted sentence claiming "no topical treatment" as discussed • Bobsd • (talk) 06:51, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class chemicals articles
- High-importance chemicals articles
- C-Class pharmacology articles
- Low-importance pharmacology articles
- WikiProject Pharmacology articles
- C-Class Food and drink articles
- Low-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- C-Class Molecular Biology articles
- Unknown-importance Molecular Biology articles
- C-Class MCB articles
- Low-importance MCB articles
- WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology articles
- All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages