Misplaced Pages

:Requests for adminship/JuJube - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SJP (talk | contribs) at 16:08, 29 March 2007 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:08, 29 March 2007 by SJP (talk | contribs) (→[])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

JuJube

Voice your opinion (28/0/1); Scheduled to end 00:34, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

JuJube (talk · contribs) - JuJube's been registered since August '05 and has amassed over 21000 edits - so he's plenty active enough here. Article work is mainly on Yu-Gi-Oh/Animé pages, as well as vandal reversions. He takes part in many admin areas, including WP:AIV and WP:AFD. He definitely has the necessary experience to perform admin chores, and thus I think he should be granted the admin mop. Majorly (o rly?) 16:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Sure, I'll give it a shot this time. JuJube 00:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)


Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Misplaced Pages in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: Reviewing articles for speedy deletion would probably be something I spend a lot of time doing. I often check Newpages and am surprised at how long some articles last. Administrators have a lot to do, and I hope to help by giving them less to worry about. I'd also like to be able to help mediate some debates; as I am pretty much neutral about everything, I can be an impartial mediator. Ultimately, I'd just like to do whatever I can.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Misplaced Pages, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: Even though I no longer monitor it, God Passes By (a historical book of the Bahá'í Faith) was started by myself, and it's become quite a nice page. There are other articles that I do still monitor that I feel pleased with, but I feel that contributions in an environment like this should be attributed to the group and not necessarily to the individual.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: To be fair, I'm pretty blunt and that has gotten me into some conflicts with others, but I believe that the responsibility of being a Misplaced Pages administrator will give me reason to be less matter-of-fact and more accomodating. I've resisted the idea of being an admin for a long time because I was worried about my ability to do so, particularly on the few topics that I do feel strongly about; but I've changed a great deal since then and I think I can do well at the job if given a chance. When I'm feeling stressed about a debate, the best thing for me is to walk away, do something else for awhile and get emotional and mental distance. I often feel less angry in the morning, in short. ^_^
General comments
  • See JuJube's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.
  • A previous RfA was requested for me when I was "Danny Lilithborne" and I turned it down because I felt I was going to get a kidney transplant shortly; that situation has changed, unfortunately, but as a result I believe I will have the time to notify the rest of WP in the eventuality that that happens. In any case, if voters have their doubts, I won't hate you for voting "oppose". :)

Please keep criticism constructive and polite.

Discussion

Support

  1. Strong support Thought you were one already, Majorly does great noms! :-) Ryanpostlethwaite contribs/talk 00:48, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  2. Support I see no reason to not. Good luck with the kidneys. Viridae 00:48, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  3. Strong support Excellent vandal fighter and doesn't let trolls get to him. —dgiesc 00:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  4. Fourth support. Dammit I'm late! ;) Majorly (o rly?) 00:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  5. Support Why haven't you been nominated before? The Evil Clown 00:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  6. I would've bet money on you already being one. John Reaves (talk) 00:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  7. Support — I believe this user deserves the promotion in trust and potential responsibility. — Deckiller 00:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  8. Support - yah, totally. Seen you lots of times on WP:AIV - Alison 00:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  9. Support Impressive user. When Majorly nominates someone, you know they are good. Captain panda In vino veritas 01:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  10. Support This user will make a great admin. Gutworth 01:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  11. Support Good user who will make a good admin. Cbrown1023 talk 02:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  12. Support. Ditto with Captain Panda. bibliomaniac15 02:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  13. Support I've seen JuJube at AFD, and his credentials as given here are superlative. I wish him the best of health. YechielMan 02:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  14. Well, you've been here more 1 and 1/2 years, over 10000 mainspace edits. Good luck. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 02:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  15. Support. This RFA is way over due! -Mschel 03:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  16. Support. Michael 03:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  17. Support. Good. --- RockMFR 04:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  18. Support. Definitely can use the tools. Heimstern Läufer 04:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  19. Support. A great editor, and won't abuse the tools. ···日本穣 06:06, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  20. Support. -- LeCour 06:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  21. Support, has always come across as a good bloke on the very many occasions I've seen him around. Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  22. Support would make good admin.--Jersey Devil 10:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  23. Support good candidate. - Anas 10:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  24. Supportper nom. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 12:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  25. Support, seen JuJube around, plenty of activity, not noticed any problems, No Big Deal. Guy (Help!) 12:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  26. Support a name that has been popping up all over the place. I think there are plenty of reasons to support outlined above. James086 12:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  27. 27 -- FayssalF - 13:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  28. Hell yeah! – Riana 14:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  29. Terence 14:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  30. Support JuJube is a smart, dedicated, calm editor. I'm looking forward to having you as an admin. Gwernol 15:18, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
  31. Suport Seems reliable and is active enough. James, La gloria è a dio 16:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

  1. Neutral A little concerned that JuJube did not warn the author of Haldibug, probably a minor oversight due to working on other possible hoaxes.--Ng.j 08:05, 29 March 2007 (UTC)