This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 69.237.115.101 (talk) at 19:34, 13 March 2007 (Fannish Tone is rampant - Mr Anonymous). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:34, 13 March 2007 by 69.237.115.101 (talk) (Fannish Tone is rampant - Mr Anonymous)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- the entire article needs to be sectionalized (try more headings and subheadings); it doesn't look or read like a summary.
- all images need sources and fair use rationales.
The section titles are not written with an encyclopedic tone- the sections themselves are extremely long. It seems like they could be reorganized so that instead of a chronology of the band, each section focused on one element of the band and how it changed throught the band's history.
Lead should be a summary of the articles content, and is rather brief considering the length of the article and the 40+ years the band have existed- Fannish tone.