Misplaced Pages

Talk:Romanis Pontificibus

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Red Rose 13 (talk | contribs) at 07:31, 18 June 2022 (→Reference Issues). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 07:31, 18 June 2022 by Red Rose 13 (talk | contribs) (→Reference Issues)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
WikiProject iconCatholicism Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconRomanis Pontificibus is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Catholicism task list:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconBosnia and Herzegovina Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconRomanis Pontificibus is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Section "Historical precedent"

There seem to be two points needing to be better clarified:

  1. The section quotes "is it the role...", a text that comes from the Papal bull Ad Gentes. The current WP article doesn't make any reference to the website of the Holy See. We can consider it like a primary source. It doesn't seem to have any concern of a document titled Romanos Pontifices, even in its official Latin and French versions. The unique reference made to a document of Pope Leo XIII concerns the encyclical Divinum illud.
  1. Again in the Wp article, at the beginning of the section titled "Historical precedent", it is mentioned the "apostolic constitution Ex hac augusta" of Pope Leo XIII. The same document results a Papal bull, according to a public speech held by Pope John Paul II on May 1, 1882. The related translations are in the website of the Holy See which can be assimilated to a primary source. The English version is not yet available.Ciccio81ge (talk) 15:27, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Reference Issues

Governor Sheng please fix these reference issues:

  1. 2 dead link
  2. 3 dead link – the article is not there

Links don’t have all the reference information Red Rose 13 (talk) 23:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Fix it. Why the fuck do you tell me to do it? Governor Sheng (talk) 00:30, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
You know your swearing on Facebook is offense and is never necessary and discouraged. ]

Sorry for my error. I see you don't edit here. I will try to fix them anyway if I can.Red Rose 13 (talk) 07:30, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Categories: