This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BattyBot (talk | contribs) at 14:56, 11 February 2021 (→top: Added Template:WikiProject banner shell and other General fixes). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:56, 11 February 2021 by BattyBot (talk | contribs) (→top: Added Template:WikiProject banner shell and other General fixes)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This article was nominated for deletion on 13 May 2012. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Untitled comment
This reads almost like a sales pamphlet that I had to google a line from it just to make sure it wasn't copied from somewhere. (The only hit that turned up was clearly taken from this article, so it seems it's not a copyvio at least.) It is informative, I just think the tone of the article needs a little work. - furrykef (Talk at me) 03:01, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- I cleaned it up just a little by removing sentence fragments, for example, "Ideal for X" becomes "They are ideal for X". However, the text gets repetitive this way ("They are this, they are that..."), so it needs to be rewritten further. Also, the article needs to be consistent about "it" versus "they" when referring to a particular item ("It does have perforated sides" versus "They do have perforated sides"). - furrykef (Talk at me) 03:09, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Semi-protection
I would like to request semi-protection for this article. Many page-blanking vandalisms have occurred.
Name
As I can remember, that brand used to be called Depends. I wonder when it was renamed to Depend. --PJ Pete —Preceding comment was added at 04:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Edited
I've removed the excessive descriptions unnecessary for an encyclopedic article. A basic run-down of the available products, with a brief outline of the design and intended usage is sufficient. This is NOT the place to go into details of leakguards and comparisons to other products, for eg. Before there's a slew of complaints that removing such info is discriminatory against the afflicted, balence the common sense. It is absurd to pretend that fetishism does not influence otherwise straightforward entries: basic information starts to morphs into lavish copy and user guides, and this article had been duly done. There are plenty of sites and links to provide the rest of it. PS. So why am I here? I'm a RN :) Plutonium27 (talk) 19:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Depends
Count on your life with Depends!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.91.229.5 (talk) 21:47, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Categories:- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Brands articles
- Low-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- C-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles