Misplaced Pages

Draft:Raegan Revord

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CSASResearch (talk | contribs) at 02:34, 29 May 2024 (-- Draft creation using the WP:Article wizard -- Included reference links to different wikipedia links, revamped the overall biography in order to include more relevant informations and also used more relevant sources). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:34, 29 May 2024 by CSASResearch (talk | contribs) (-- Draft creation using the WP:Article wizard -- Included reference links to different wikipedia links, revamped the overall biography in order to include more relevant informations and also used more relevant sources)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Submission declined on 4 March 2024 by AngusWOOF (talk).This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
  • If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
  • Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help
  • If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
  • If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
How to improve a draft

You can also browse Misplaced Pages:Featured articles and Misplaced Pages:Good articles to find examples of Misplaced Pages's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft Editor resources This draft has not been edited in over six months and qualifies to be deleted per CSD G13. Declined by AngusWOOF 9 months ago. Last edited by CSASResearch 7 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author.
ResubmitPlease note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.
Submission declined on 6 October 2023 by Johannes Maximilian (talk).This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Johannes Maximilian 14 months ago.
Submission declined on 8 December 2022 by Primefac (talk).This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. Declined by Primefac 2 years ago.
Submission rejected on 16 November 2022 by AngusWOOF (talk).

This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages.

Rejected by AngusWOOF 2 years ago.
Submission declined on 16 June 2022 by AngusWOOF (talk).This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. Declined by AngusWOOF 2 years ago.
Submission declined on 28 May 2022 by Kaleeb18 (talk).This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. Declined by Kaleeb18 2 years ago.
Submission declined on 8 February 2022 by AngusWOOF (talk).This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. Declined by AngusWOOF 2 years ago.
Submission declined on 20 January 2022 by Dan arndt (talk).This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. Declined by Dan arndt 2 years ago.
Submission declined on 17 November 2020 by IVORK (talk).This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. Declined by IVORK 4 years ago.
  • Comment: No significant improvement since previous submit in October. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 18:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
  • Comment: Mostly sourced to interviews and other PRIMARY references such as a show's website, with the remainder being brief mentions lacking significant coverage. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail. Primefac (talk) 14:52, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
  • Comment: There are a few threads on the talk page that might be of interest. Primefac (talk) 15:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Comment: Once again, the decliner is very terse here. This submission is declined because Revord so far does not have a second significant role - when NACTOR talks about multiple films, tv shows, etc, that means more than one. The article needs to wait until Revord scores her second significant role, satisfying NACTOR. CapnZapp (talk) 16:31, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Comment: At this point, we need to wait for her second significant role, which none has been presented since the May 2022 decline. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 16:19, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Categories: