Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/User names - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GDonato (talk | contribs) at 08:01, 16 April 2007 (Spammyou: comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 08:01, 16 April 2007 by GDonato (talk | contribs) (Spammyou: comment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Shortcuts
Navigation: ArchivesInstructions for closing administratorsPurge page cache

This page is for bringing attention to usernames which may be in violation of Misplaced Pages's username policy. Before listing a username here, consider if it should be more appropriately reported elsewhere, or if it needs to be reported at all:

Do NOT post here if:

Before adding a name here you MUST ensure that the user in question:

  • has been warned about their username (with e.g. {{subst:uw-username}}) and has been allowed time to address the concern on their user talk page.
  • has disagreed with the concern, refused to change their username and/or continued to edit without replying to the warning.
  • is not already blocked.

If, after having followed all the steps above, you still believe the username violates Misplaced Pages's username policy, you may list it here with an explanation of which part of the username policy you think has been violated. After posting, please alert the user of the discussion (with e.g. {{subst:UsernameDiscussion}}). You may also invite others who have expressed concern about the username to comment on the discussion by use of this template.

Add new requests below, using the syntax {{subst:rfcn1|username|2=reason ~~~~}}.

Tools: Special:ListUsers, Special:BlockList


Spammyou

Spammyou (talk · contribs)

The username policy does not allow names that seem to threaten unpleasant activities such as spam. "Spammyou" has no other meaning; I checked Google. YechielMan 07:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
  • I'd say this is not blockable but a change should be encouraged, since this user has ade some useful contributions, again giving the a chance to explain would be good. I see no actual spamming. GDonato (talk) 08:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)