This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 10:00, 24 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:00, 24 February 2024 by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Kenneth Michael Trentadue was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 16, 2012). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
A fact from Kenneth Michael Trentadue appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 December 2008, and was viewed approximately 3,008 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Additional FOIA requests rejected
"Trentadue said he is seeking more tapes along with a variety of bombing-related documents from the FBI and the CIA. An FOIA request by Trentadue for 26 CIA documents was rejected in June. A letter from the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which reviewed the documents, said their release "could cause grave damage to our national security."
https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-09-27-okla-city-bombing-tapes_N.htm
Additions to the lede
I recently removed new additions to the lede by User:MothballX. For two reasons: 1) because they essentially recapitulated information found elsewhere in the article, and, perhaps more importantly, 2) because it is speculation. The article talks about the speculation and theorizing regarding the circumstances around Trentadue's death, but it's just that: unsupported conspiracy theorizing. Not that I think it has no place in the article! But I think in general it is best to cleave to WP:LEDE, and let the facts speak for themselves. The lede should represent factual, verifiable information. Ford MF (talk) 05:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- According to WP:LEDE the lede is supposed to establish notability and provide a brief summary of the main points in the article. Prior to my additions it accomplished neither of these goals, now it does both. I have kept the intro NPOV. Everything I added to the introduction is supported by sources. Nothing there specifically says there was a conspiracy, just that some people believe there was and use the two other suicides as evidence of this. --MothballX (talk) 05:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Kenneth Michael Trentadue/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Hghyux (talk · contribs) 22:07, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Checklist 1
- Not an obvious fail. ✗ Fail Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 22:13, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Result
N Failed per WP:SNOW. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 22:13, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Summary
I ask that the nominator please read the good article criteria. Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 22:13, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Categories:- Former good article nominees
- Misplaced Pages Did you know articles
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Oklahoma articles
- Low-importance Oklahoma articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class West Virginia articles
- Low-importance West Virginia articles
- WikiProject West Virginia articles
- WikiProject United States articles