Misplaced Pages

Talk:G. Edward Griffin

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnomieBOT (talk | contribs) at 15:43, 20 September 2024 (Substing templates: {{Unsigned}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:43, 20 September 2024 by AnomieBOT (talk | contribs) (Substing templates: {{Unsigned}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the G. Edward Griffin article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 2 months 
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to complementary and alternative medicine, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 9, 2006Articles for deletionKept
February 23, 2008Articles for deletionDeleted
March 7, 2008Articles for deletionKept
April 23, 2008WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
March 10, 2015Articles for deletionNo consensus
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography: Actors and Filmmakers
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).
Note icon
This article has had a peer review which is now archived.
WikiProject iconSkepticism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAlternative views Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMichigan: Detroit Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

As several of the alleged "conspiracy theories" have now been proved to be true...

... should we not revisit this, and remove the inappropriate language, and obviously political labelling? 37.189.169.148 (talk) 07:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your sources? Per WP:EXCEPTIONAL: "Any exceptional claim requires multiple high-quality sources." JimRenge (talk) 10:27, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Careful, you'll get banned for a week like I did. 72.36.47.247 (talk) 21:02, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Jim's response is more to the point. --Hob Gadling (talk) 06:49, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
This entire article is radical communist leftist nonsense with no references or facts to support any claims. 2601:2C3:867F:4760:397D:805C:C5AD:7B81 (talk) 22:17, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Wow, unsupported statement, following by bizarre ad hominem, followed by "COMMIES!", and not a single actual source or reference, just abuse. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:15, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Poor and/or biased references

Concerning the claim from the introductory paragraph that Griffin's theories on the Federal Reseve have been debunked, I followed the (single) citation to a book called "Pranksters : making mischief in the modern world" and read the relevant chapters. It does nothing by way of "disproving" the claim, and no actual, fact-based argument is advanced. Instead, it's but a "claim against the claim", a simple statement in other words that what Griffin says is wrong and/or exaggerated, while shame is attributed to the otherwise respectable men who promoted his theories. It's a mark of hypocrisy to call a theory debunked by citing a reference that does not even try to debunk it factually. I believe that this entire claim must be removed from this article, or citations to actual proofs must be found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.74.254.1820 (talkcontribs) September 2024 (UTC)

 Not done The source is fine. Bon courage (talk) 15:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Categories: