This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kwamikagami (talk | contribs) at 13:30, 21 March 2005 (added alternative classification). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:30, 21 March 2005 by Kwamikagami (talk | contribs) (added alternative classification)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Sino-Tibetan languages form a language family of about 250 languages of East Asia, in number of speakers worldwide second only to Indo-European. Many of them are tonal.
- Chinese languages: many of which are 'monosyllabic', analytic languages
- Tibeto-Burman languages: (Refer to Tibeto-Burman languages and their subgrouping for more details)
- Kamarupan
- Himalayish
- Qiangic
- Kachinic
- Lolo-Burmese
- Karenic
Some linguists believe the Tai-Kadai languages or Hmong-Mien languages deserve a place within an expanded version of this family, though this view is falling out of favor. Several recent classifications have demoted Chinese to a sub-branch of Tibeto-Burman. The following classification from George van Driem is one:
Tibeto-Burman
- Brahmaputran
- Dhimal
- Bodo-Koch (includes Tripuri, Garo)
- Konyak
- Kachinic (includes Jingpaw)
- Southern Tibeto-Burman
- Lolo-Burmese
- Karenic
- Sino-Bodic
- Sinitic (Chinese)
- Bodish-Himalayish (includes Tibetan)
- Kirantic
- Tamangic
- (several isolates)
In addition, van Driem's Tibeto-Burman includes a number of small families and isolates, such as Newari, Qiang, Nung, and Magar, as primary branches. The relationships of the "Kuki-Naga" languages (Kuki, Mizo, Manipuri, etc.), both amongst each other and to the other Tibeto-Burman languages, is unclear, so the "Kamarupan" hypothesis is not supported.
External links
- Tibeto-Burman languages and their subgrouping
- Sino-Bodic - George van Driem