This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 11:56, 30 July 2023 (Adding {{WikiProject banner shell}} (Task 19)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:56, 30 July 2023 by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) (Adding {{WikiProject banner shell}} (Task 19))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. |
User:Champion, you have added the tag to this film that it is a fans point of view and not a neutral point of view, can you let me know which part of the article looks like that?--Ravichandra (talk) 02:19, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I believe that the plot section is difficult to comprehend. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- User:Champion, If it is difficult to comprehend, do you think we should mark it as not a neutral point of view? Neutral point of view indicates that the article is not biased and does not use any eulogizing or Wiesel words. Tell me which part of it is difficult to comprehend.--Ravichandra (talk) 02:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I say the whole section, I'll fix the tags. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I can't understand why this simple story is difficult to understand. Sorry but I can't agree with you. --Ravichandra (talk) 03:13, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- I say the whole section, I'll fix the tags. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- User:Champion, If it is difficult to comprehend, do you think we should mark it as not a neutral point of view? Neutral point of view indicates that the article is not biased and does not use any eulogizing or Wiesel words. Tell me which part of it is difficult to comprehend.--Ravichandra (talk) 02:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)